Why people believe weird things | Michael Shermer

Prevoditelj: Zdenko Simic Recezent: Mislav Ante Omazić - EFZG

I'm Michael Shermer, director of the Skeptics Society,

Ej, ja sam Michael Shermer, direktor Društva skeptičnih,

publisher of "Skeptic" magazine.

izdavač magazina Skeptik.

We investigate claims of the paranormal,

Istražujemo tvrdnje o paranormalnom, kvazi-znanosti,

pseudo-science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between,

i marginalnih grupa i kultova te svih vrsta rubnih tvrdnji --

science and pseudo-science and non-science and junk science,

znanosti i kvazi-znanosti i ne-znanosti i otpada od znanosti,

voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non-science,

vudu znanosti, patološkoj znanosti, lošoj znanosti, ne-znanosti

and plain old non-sense.

i obične stare besmislenosti.

And unless you've been on Mars recently,

I osim ako niste skoro bili na Marsu,

you know there's a lot of that out there.

znate da toga ima dosta vani.

Some people call us debunkers, which is kind of a negative term.

Neki ljudi nas zovu razotkrivačima, što je neka vrsta negativnog naziva.

But let's face it, there's a lot of bunk.

Ali budimo realni -- puno je toga pokrivenoga,

We are like the bunko squads of the police departments out there --

i mi kao odred policijske uprave za tajnovito, ispiremo.

well, we're sort of like the Ralph Naders of bad ideas,

Dakle, mi smo kao Ralph Naders loših ideja --

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

trying to replace bad ideas with good ideas.

-- pokušavajći zamijeniti loše ideje s dobrim idejama.

I'll show you an example of a bad idea.

Pokazati ću vam primjer loše ideje.

I brought this with me,

Donio sam ovo sa sobom.

this was given to us by NBC Dateline to test.

Ovo su nam dali s programa NBC Dateline na testiranje.

It's produced by the Quadro Corporation of West Virginia.

To je -- to je proizvela Quadro Corporation iz Zapadne Virginia-e.

It's called the Quadro 2000 Dowser Rod.

Zove se Quadro 2000 Dowser Rod.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

This was being sold to high-school administrators for $900 apiece.

Ovo se prodavalo ravnateljima srednjih škola za 900 dolara po komadu.

It's a piece of plastic with a Radio Shack antenna attached to it.

To je komad plastike s običnom antenom dodanom na nju.

You could dowse for all sorts of things,

Možete otkrivati sve moguće stvari, ali ovaj

but this particular one was built to dowse for marijuana

je napravljen za otkrivanje marihuane u ormarićima učenika.

in students' lockers.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

So the way it works is you go down the hallway,

Dakle način na koji to radi je, idete kroz hodnik i vidite ako

and you see if it tilts toward a particular locker,

skreće prema nekom ormariću, i onda otvorite ormarić.

and then you open the locker.

So it looks something like this.

Dakle to izgleda otprilike ovako.

I'll show you.

Pokazat ću vam.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

Well, it has kind of a right-leaning bias.

Ne, to -- u redu, ima nekako naginjanje na desno.

Dakle, pokazat ću vam -- u redu, ovo je znanost, provest ćemo kontrolirani eksperiment.

Well, this is science, so we'll do a controlled experiment.

Ići će sigurno u ovom smjeru.

It'll go this way for sure.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

Sir, do you want to empty your pockets, please, sir?

Gospodine, hoćete isprazniti vaše džepove. Molim vas, gospodine?

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

So the question was, can it actually find marijuana in students' lockers?

Znači pitanje je bilo, može li to stvarno naći marihuanu u učeničkim ormarićima?

And the answer is, if you open enough of them, yes.

I odgovor je, ako ih dovoljno otvorite -- da.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

But in science, we have to keep track of the misses, not just the hits.

Ali u znanosti, moramo pratiti promašaje, ne samo pogotke.

And that's probably the key lesson to my short talk here:

A to je vjerovatno ključna lekcija mog kratkog govora ovdje, je da

This is how psychics work, astrologers, tarot card readers and so on.

tako rade vidovnjaci, astrolozi, i čitači tarot karata i tako dalje.

People remember the hits and forget the misses.

Ljudi pamte pogotke; oni zaboravljaju promašaje.

In science, we keep the whole database,

U znanosti moramo čuvati cijelu bazu podataka,

and look to see if the number of hits somehow stands out

i gledati ako se broj pogodaka nekako ističe

from the total number you'd expect by chance.

od ukupnog broja koji biste očekivali slučajno.

In this case, we tested it.

U ovom slučaju smo to testirali.

We had two opaque boxes:

Imali smo dvije neprozirne kutije,

one with government-approved THC marijuana, and one with nothing.

jednu s THC marihuanom odobrenom od vlasti, i jednu praznu.

And it got it 50 percent of the time --

I pogodilo je u 50 posto slučajeva --

(Laughter)

-- što je točno koliko bi očekivali s modelom bacanja novčića.

which is exactly what you'd expect with a coin-flip model.

So that's just a fun little example here of the sorts of things we do.

Dakle to je samo mali zabavni primjer vrste onog čime se mi bavimo.

Skeptic izlazi jednom u kvartalu.

"Skeptic" is the quarterly publication. Each one has a particular theme.

Svaki ima određenu temu, poput ovoga koji je o budućnosti inteligencije.

This one is on the future of intelligence.

Are people getting smarter or dumber?

Postaju li ljudi pametniji ili gluplji?

I have an opinion of this myself because of the business I'm in,

Ja imam mišljenje o ovome osobno zbog posla kojim se bavim.

but in fact, people, it turns out, are getting smarter.

Ali, uistinu, ljudi, ispada, postaju pametniji.

Tri IQ boda za 10 godina, idemo gore.

Three IQ points per 10 years, going up.

Sort of an interesting thing.

Na neki način zanimljiva stvar.

With science, don't think of skepticism as a thing, or science as a thing.

Sa znanosti, ne mislite o skepticizmu kao stvari čak ili čak o znanosti kao stvari.

Are science and religion compatible?

Jesu li znanost i religija kompatibilne?

It's like, are science and plumbing compatible?

To je kao, jesu li znanost i vodoinstalerstvo kompatibilni?

They're just two different things.

One -- to su samo dvije različite stvari.

Science is not a thing. It's a verb.

Znanost nije stvar. To je glagol.

It's a way of thinking about things.

To je način razmišljanja o stvarima.

It's a way of looking for natural explanations for all phenomena.

To je način traženja prirodnih objašnjenja za sve fenomene.

I mean, what's more likely:

Mislim, što je vjerojatnije --

that extraterrestrial intelligences or multi-dimensional beings

da vanzemaljci ili višedimenzionalna stvorenja putuju preko

travel across vast distances of interstellar space

ogromnih udaljnosti međuzvjezdanog svemira da ostave krug u žitu

to leave a crop circle in Farmer Bob's field in Puckerbrush, Kansas

u polju Farmera Boba u Puckerbrushu, Kansasa da promovira skeptic.com, naše web stranice?

to promote skeptic.com, our web page?

Or is it more likely that a reader of "Skeptic" did this with Photoshop?

Ili je vjerojatnije da je neki čitatelj Skeptica uradio to Photoshopom?

And in all cases we have to ask --

I u svim slučajevima moramo se pitati --

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

What's the more likely explanation?

-- koje je vjerojatnije objašnjenje?

Before we say something is out of this world,

I prije nego što kažemo da nešto potječe izvan ovog svijeta,

we should first make sure that it's not in this world.

trebali bi prvo biti sigurnim da to nije na ovom svetu.

What's more likely:

Što je vjerojatnije --

that Arnold had extraterrestrial help in his run for the governorship,

da je Arnold imao malu vanzemaljsku pomoć u izboru za guvernera?

or that the "World Weekly News" makes stuff up?

Ili da World Weekly News izmišlja stvari?

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

The same theme is expressed nicely here in this Sidney Harris cartoon.

I dio toga -- ista tema je izražena lijepo

ovdje u ovoj karikaturi Sidney Harrisa.

For those of you in the back, it says here: "Then a miracle occurs.

Za vas otraga, ovdje piše "I onda se dogodi čudo.

I think you need to be more explicit here in step two."

Mislim kako moraš biti određeniji ovdje u koraku dva."

This single slide completely dismantles the intelligent design arguments.

Ovaj jedan slajd kompletno uništava argumente inteligentnog dizajna.

There's nothing more to it than that.

Nema u tome ništa više osim toga.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

You can say a miracle occurs,

Možete reći da se čuda događaju.

it's just that it doesn't explain anything or offer anything.

Samo to ne objašnjava ništa.

There's nothing to test.

Ne nudi ništa. Nema ničega za testiranje.

It's the end of the conversation for intelligent design creationists.

Ovo je kraj razgovora za kreatore inteligentnog dizajna.

And it's true, scientists sometimes throw terms out as linguistic place fillers --

Gdje se -- i točno je, znanstvenici ponekad izbace termine da

popune mjesta u rečenici -- tamna energija ili tamna materija ili tako nešto.

dark energy or dark matter, something like that --

until we figure out what it is, we'll call it this.

Dok ne shvatimo što je to, samo ćemo ju zvati tako.

It's the beginning of the causal chain for science.

Ovo je početak uzročnog lanca za znanost.

Za kreatore inteligentnog dizajna, ovo je kraj lanca.

For intelligent design creationists, it's the end of the chain.

I opet, možemo se pitati ovo -- što je verovatnije --

So again, we can ask this: what's more likely?

Are UFOs alien spaceships, or perceptual cognitive mistakes, or even fakes?

jesu li NLO-i vanzemaljski svemirski brodovi ili perceptivne kognitivne greške, ili čak lažnjaci?

This is a UFO shot from my house in Altadena, California,

Ovo je NLO snimak iz moje kuće u Atladenai, California,

looking down over Pasadena.

nadgledajući Pasadenau.

And if it looks a lot like a Buick hubcap, it's because it is.

I ako dosta izgleda kao ratkapa Buicka, to je zato što je.

You don't even need Photoshop or high-tech equipment,

Ne treba vam ni Photoshop, ne treba vam oprema visoke tehnologije,

you don't need computers.

ne trebaju vam računala.

This was shot with a throwaway Kodak Instamatic camera.

Ovo je snimak s jednokratnom Kodak Instamatik kamerom.

You just have somebody off on the side with a hubcap ready to go.

Jednostavno imate nekog sa strane spremnog da krene s ratkapom.

Camera's ready -- that's it.

Kamera spremna -- to je to.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

So, although it's possible that most of these things are fake

Dakle, iako je moguće da je većina ovih stvari lažna

or illusions or so on, and that some of them are real,

ili iluzije i tako dalje i da su neke od njih stvarne,

it's more likely that all of them are fake, like the crop circles.

vjerojatnije je da su sve lažne, kao i krugovi u polju.

On a more serious note, in all of science we're looking for a balance

S puno ozbiljnije strane, u cijeloj znanosti tražimo ravnotežu

between data and theory.

između podataka i teorije.

In the case of Galileo, he had two problems

U Galilejevom slučaju, on je imao dva problema

when he turned his telescope to Saturn.

kada je okrenuo svoj teleskop prema Saturnu.

First of all, there was no theory of planetary rings.

Najprije, nije postojala teorija o planetarnim prstenovima.

Second of all, his data was grainy and fuzzy,

I napokon, njegovi podaci su bili zrnati i zbrkani,

and he couldn't quite make out what he was looking at.

i nije baš mogao shvati što je on to točno gledao.

So he wrote that he had seen --

I onda je on napisao da je vidio --

"I have observed that the furthest planet has three bodies."

"Opazio sam kako najudaljeniji planet ima tri tijela."

And this is what he ended up concluding that he saw.

I to je što je on na kraju zaključio da je vidio.

So without a theory of planetary rings and with only grainy data,

Dakle bez teorije o planetarnim prstenovima i sa zrnatim podacima,

you can't have a good theory.

ne možete imati dobru teoriju.

It wasn't solved until 1655.

I ovo nije bilo riješeno do 1655.

This is Christiaan Huygens's book that catalogs all the mistakes

Ovo je knjiga Christiaan Huygensa u kojoj je katalogizirao sve greške

people made trying to figure out what was going on with Saturn.

koje su ljudi pravili pokušavajući da shvate šta se događa sa Saturnom.

It wasn't till Huygens had two things:

I nije sve dok -- Hojgens nije imao dvije stvari.

He had a good theory of planetary rings and how the solar system operated,

Imao je dobru teoriju o planetarnim prstenovima i kako solarni sustav radi.

and he had better telescopic, more fine-grain data

I onda, imao je bolji teleskop, više sitnozrnih podataka

in which he could figure out that as the Earth is going around faster --

u kojima je shvatio da dok Zemlja kruži brže --

according to Kepler's Laws -- than Saturn, then we catch up with it.

po Keplerovim zakonima -- od Saturna, onda se mi uhvatimo s njim.

And we see the angles of the rings at different angles, there.

I vidimo kutove prstenova pod različitim kutovima, ovdje.

And that, in fact, turns out to be true.

I to se, zapravo, ispostavilo kao istinito.

The problem with having a theory is that it may be loaded with cognitive biases.

Problemi s teorijom koju imamo

je da vaša teorija može biti prepuna kognitivnih predrasuda.

So one of the problems of explaining why people believe weird things

Dakle, jedan od problema objašnjavanja zašto ljudi vjeruju u čudne stvari

is that we have things, on a simple level,

je da mi imamo stvari na jednostavnoj razini.

and then I'll go to more serious ones.

A onda ću preći na ozbiljnije.

Like, we have a tendency to see faces.

Na primjer, mi smo skloni vidjeti lica.

This is the face on Mars.

Ovo je lice na Marsu koje je bilo --

In 1976, where there was a whole movement to get NASA to photograph that area

1976., kada je postojao cijeli pokret koji je htio da NASA

fotografira to područje jer su ljudi mislili

because people thought this was monumental architecture made by Martians.

da je to monumentalna arhitektura koju su napravili Marsijanci.

Here's the close-up of it from 2001.

Ipak, kako se ispostavlja -- evo ga bliža snimka iz 2001.

If you squint, you can still see the face.

Ako žmirkate, i dalje možete vidjeti lice.

And when you're squinting,

I kada žmirkate, ono što radite je

you're turning that from fine-grain to coarse-grain,

da ga pretvarate iz fino zrnatog u grubo zrnato.

so you're reducing the quality of your data.

I tako, smanjujete kvalitetu svojih podataka.

And if I didn't tell you what to look for, you'd still see the face,

I da vam ja nisam rekao šta da tražite, opet biste vidjeli lice,

because we're programmed by evolution to see faces.

jer smo isprogramirani evolucijom da vidimo lica.

Faces are important for us socially.

Lica su nam socijalno bitna.

And of course, happy faces, faces of all kinds are easy to see.

I naravno, sretna lica.

Lica svih vrsta je lako vidjeti.

You see the happy face on Mars, there.

(Smijeh)

Možete vidjeti sretno lice na Marsu, ovdje.

(Laughter)

If astronomers were frogs, perhaps they'd see Kermit the Frog.

Kada bi astronomi bili žabe možda bi vidjeli žapca Kermita .

Do you see him there? Little froggy legs.

Vidite li ga tu?

Or if geologists were elephants?

Male žablje noge.

Ili da su geolozi slonovi?

Religious iconography.

Religijska ikonografija.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

Discovered by a Tennessee baker in 1996.

Otkriveno od strane pekara is Tennesseea 1996.

He charged five bucks a head to come see the nun bun

Naplaćivao je pet dolara po osobi da vide časnu sestru žemlju

till he got a cease-and-desist from Mother Teresa's lawyer.

dok ga odvjetnici Majke Tereze nisu natjerali da prestane.

Here's Our Lady of Guadalupe and Our Lady of Watsonville, just down the street,

Ovo je Naša Gospa od Guadalupe i Naša Gospa od Vatsonvilla, odmah niz ulicu.

or is it up the street from here?

Ili je to uz ulicu odavde?

Tree bark is particularly good because it's nice and grainy, branchy,

Stablo je naročito dobro jer je lijepo i hrapavo, granato,

black-and-white splotchy and you can get the pattern-seeking --

izmrljano crno-bijelom bojom gdje možete tražiti oblike --

humans are pattern-seeking animals.

ljudi su životinje koje traže oblike.

Here's the Virgin Mary on the side of a glass window in Sao Paulo.

Evo je Djevica Marija na prozoru u Sao Paulou.

Here's when the Virgin Mary made her appearance on a cheese sandwich --

Sad, ovdje se Djevica Marija pojavila na sandviču od sira --

koji sam zapravo držao u kasinu u Las Vegasu,

which I got to actually hold in a Las Vegas casino --

of course, this being America.

naravno, jer to ovo Amerika.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

This casino paid $28,500 on eBay for the cheese sandwich.

Ovaj kasino je platio 28,500 dolara na eBayu za ovaj sendvič.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

But who does it really look like? The Virgin Mary?

Ali na koga stvarno sliči, Djevicu Mariju?

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

It has that sort of puckered lips, 1940s-era look.

Ima napućene usne, izgled 1940-ih.

Virgin Mary in Clearwater, Florida.

Djevica Marija u Clearwater, Floridi.

I actually went to see this one.

Išao sam zapravo vidjeti ovo.

There was a lot of people there.

Bilo je puno ljudi tamo -- vjernici su došli da budu u svojim --

The faithful come in their wheelchairs and crutches, and so on.

kolicima i štakama, i tako dalje.

We went down and investigated.

I otišli smo dolje, istražiti.

Just to give you a size, that's Dawkins, me and The Amazing Randi,

Da vam dam predstavu o veličini -- to je Dawkins, ja i Nevjerojatni Randi,

next to this two, two and a half story-sized image.

pored ove slike veličine dva, dva i pol kata.

All these candles, thousands of candles people had lit in tribute to this.

Sve te svijeće, tolike tisuće svijeća koje su ljudi upalili u čast tome.

So we walked around the backside, to see what was going on.

Onda smo otišli iza, samo da vidimo šta se tamo događa,

It turns out wherever there's a sprinkler head and a palm tree,

kad se ispostavilo da ako imate prskalicu i palmu,

you get the effect.

dobijate taj efekt.

Here's the Virgin Mary on the backside, which they started to wipe off.

Tu je Devica Marija od iza, koju su počeli brisati.

I guess you can only have one miracle per building.

Pretpostavljam da možete imati samo jedno čudo po zgradi.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

So is it really a miracle of Mary, or is it a miracle of Marge?

Onda je li to stvarno čudo Marije ili Marge?

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

And now I'm going to finish up with another example of this,

I završiti ću s još jednim primjerom

with auditory illusions.

sa zvukom -- zvučnim iluzijama.

There's this film, "White Noise," with Michael Keaton,

Postoji jedan film, "Bijeli zvuk",

s Michaelom Keatonom o mrtvima koji nam govore.

about the dead talking back to us.

By the way, the whole business of talking to the dead is not that big a deal.

Usput, taj cijeli posao pričanja s mrtvima, nije neka velika stvar.

Kako izgleda, svatko to može raditi.

Anybody can do it, turns out.

It's getting the dead to talk back that's the really hard part.

Natjerati mrtve da odgovaraju je ustvari teški dio.

(Smijeh)

(Laughter)

Naime, u ovom slučaju te poruke su sakrivene u elektronskom fenomenu.

In this case, supposedly, these messages are hidden in electronic phenomena.

There's a ReverseSpeech.com web page where I downloaded this stuff.

Postoji web stranica ReverseSpeech.com (obrnuti govor) s koje sam skinuo ovu stvar.

This is the most famous one of all of these.

Evo ga od naprijed -- ovo je najpoznatiji od svih.

Here's the forward version of the very famous song.

Evo verzija od naprijed jako poznate pjesme.

(Music with lyrics)

If there's a bustle in your hedgerow don't be alarmed now.

It's just a spring clean for the May Queen.

Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run,

There's still time to change the road you're on.

(Music ends)

Couldn't you just listen to that all day?

Ooo, ne biste li slušali ovo po cijeli dan?

(Smijeh)

All right, here it is backwards,

U redu, evo ga od unazad,

and see if you can hear the hidden messages that are supposedly in there.

i vidite možete li naći skrivene poruke koje su navodno tu.

(Music with unintelligible lyrics)

(Lyrics) Satan!

(Unintelligible lyrics continue)

What did you get? Audience: Satan!

Što ste čuli?

Satan. OK, at least we got "Satan".

(Publika: Sotonu.)

Now, I'll prime the auditory part of your brain

Sotona? U redu, onda, barem imamo Sotonu.

to tell you what you're supposed to hear, and then hear it again.

Sada, pripremit ću vaš auditorni dio mozga

da vam kaže što biste trebali čuti, i onda to poslušajte opet.

(Music with lyrics)

(Music ends)

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

You can't miss it when I tell you what's there.

Ne može vam promaći kada vam kažem što je tu.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

I'm going to just end with a positive, nice little story.

U redu, završit ću s jednom pozitivnom, lijepom, malom pričom

o -- Skeptics je neprofitna obrazovna organizacija.

The Skeptics is a nonprofit educational organization.

We're always looking for little good things that people do.

Uvijek tražimo male, dobre stvari koje ljudi rade.

And in England, there's a pop singer.

I u Engleskoj, postoji jedna pop pjevačica.

One of the top popular singers in England today, Katie Melua.

Vrlo -- jedna od najpopularnijih pjevačica današnjice u Engleskoj, Katie Melua.

And she wrote a beautiful song.

I ona je napisala prekrasnu pjesmu.

It was in the top five in 2005, called, "Nine Million Bicycles in Beijing."

Bila je u prvih pet 2005., nazvana, "Devet milijuna bicikla u Pekingu."

It's a love story -- she's sort of the Norah Jones of the UK --

To je ljubavna priča -- ona je kao Norah Jones Velike Britanije --

about how she much loves her guy,

o tome kako ona jako voli svog dečka,

and compared to nine million bicycles, and so forth.

i upoređuje ga s devet milijuna bicikla, i tako dalje.

And she has this one passage here.

I ima ovaj pasus ovdje.

(Music)

(Lyrics) We are 12 billion light-years from the edge

♫ Mi smo 12 milijardi svjetlosnih godina od ruba ♫

♫ To je pretpostavka ♫

That's a guess,

No one can ever say it's true,

♫ Nitko ne može ikada reći kako je to istina ♫

But I know that I will always be with you.

♫ Ali ja znam da ću uvijek biti s tobom ♫

Dakle, to je lijepo.

Michael Shermer: Well, that's nice. At least she got it close.

Bar je bila blizu.

In America it'd be, "We're 6,000 light years from the edge."

U Americi bi bilo, "Mi smo 6.000 svjetlosnih godina od ruba."

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

But my friend, Simon Singh, the particle physicist now turned science educator,

Ali moj prijatelj, Simon Singh, koji se bavi fizikom elementarnih čestica, sada je postao nastavnik znanosti,

who wrote the book "The Big Bang," and so on,

i on je napisao knjigu "Veliki prasak" i tako dalje.

uses every chance he gets to promote good science.

On koristi svaku priliku koju ima za promociju dobre znanosti.

And so he wrote an op-ed piece in "The Guardian" about Katie's song,

I tako, on je napisao članak u Guardianu o Katienoj pesmi,

in which he said, well, we know exactly how far from the edge.

u kojoj je rekao, dakle, da mi znamo točno koliko staro, koliko daleko od ruba.

You know, it's 13.7 billion light years, and it's not a guess.

Znate, to je 12 -- ima 13,7 milijardi svjetlosnih godina, i to nije pretpostavka.

We know within precise error bars how close it is.

Znamo tačno koliko unutar intervala greške koliko je blizu.

So we can say, although not absolutely true, it's pretty close to being true.

I tako, mi možemo reći, iako ne apsolutno točno, da smo vrlo blizu istini.

And, to his credit, Katie called him up after this op-ed piece came out, and said,

I, njegovom zaslugom, Katie ga je pozvala nakon što je njegov članak izašao.

I rekla, "Vrlo sam posramljena.

"I'm so embarrassed. I was in the astronomy club.

Bila sam članica astronomskog kluba, i trebalo sam znati bolje."

I should've known better."

And she re-cut the song.

I prepravila je pjesmu.

So I will end with the new version.

I ja ću završiti s novom verzijom.

(Music with lyrics)

♫ Mi smo 13.7 milijardi svjetlosnih godina ♫

We are 13.7 billion light years

from the edge of the observable universe.

♫ od ruba promotrivog svemira ♫

♫ To je dobra procjena s dobro definiranim intervalima greške ♫

That's a good estimate with well-defined error bars.

♫ I s dostupnim informacijama ♫

And with the available information,

♫ Predviđam da ću uvijek biti s tobom ♫

I predict that I will always be with you.

(Laughter)

(Pljesak)

How cool is that?

Kako je ovo fora?

(Applause)

(Pljesak)