Bring on the learning revolution! | Sir Ken Robinson

Translator: Leana Vapper Reviewer: Jaan Paaver

I was here four years ago,

Ma olin siin neli aastat tagasi

and I remember, at the time,

ja ma mäletan, et siis

that the talks weren't put online.

ei pandud loenguid veel internetti üles.

I think they were given to TEDsters in a box,

TED-i huvilised said neid soetada karbis,

a box set of DVDs,

DVD-kogumikuna karbis,

which they put on their shelves, where they are now.

mille nad panid riiulisse, kus need on siiani.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

And actually, Chris called me a week after I'd given my talk, and said,

Ja tegelikult helistas Chris mulle

nädal pärast mu loengut,

"We're going to start putting them online. Can we put yours online?"

ja ütles:"Me hakkame loenguid internetti üles panema."

"Kas me võime Sinu oma ka üles panna?" Ja ma ütlesin: "Kindel see."

And I said, "Sure."

And four years later,

Ja neli aastat hiljem

it's been downloaded four million times.

nagu ma ütlesin, on seda vaadatud neli...

Tähendab, seda on alla laetud neli miljonit korda.

Nii, et ma oletan, et võite selle korrutada umbes kahekümnega,

So I suppose you could multiply that by 20 or something

to get the number of people who've seen it.

et saada aimu, kui palju inimesi seda loengut näinud on.

Ja nagu Chris ütles, on olemas nõudlus

And, as Chris says, there is a hunger for videos of me.

minu videote järele.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

Don't you feel?

... kas teile ei tundu?

(Laughter)

(Naer)

So, this whole event has been an elaborate build-up

Niisiis, kogu see üritus on olnud keerukas loomeprotsess,

to me doing another one for you, so here it is.

et teile järgmist loengut anda. Nii, siit see tuleb.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Al Gore spoke at the TED conference I spoke at four years ago

Al Gore kõneles

neli aastat tagasi samal TED-konverentsil, kus minagi.

and talked about the climate crisis.

Ta rääkis kliimakriisidest

And I referenced that at the end of my last talk.

Ja ma viitasin sellele

oma viimase loengu lõpus.

So I want to pick up from there

Niisiis tahan jätkata, sealt, kus pooleli jäin,

because I only had 18 minutes, frankly.

sest mul oli ainult 18 minutit, kui aus olla.

(Laughter)

So, as I was saying --

Nii, nagu ma ütlesin...

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Tal on tegelikult ju õigus.

You see, he's right.

I mean, there is a major climate crisis, obviously,

Selge see, et meil on tegemist suuremat sorti kliimakriisiga.

and I think if people don't believe it, they should get out more.

Ja ma arvan, et kui inimesed seda ei usu, peaksid nad rohkem õues olema.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Aga ma usun, et on olemas veel teine kliimakriis.

But I believe there is a second climate crisis,

which is as severe,

Mis on sama tõsine,

which has the same origins,

millel on samad juured

and that we have to deal with with the same urgency.

ja millega me peame sama pakiliselt tegelema.

Ja sellega mõtlen ma...

And you may say, by the way,

ja te võite muuseas öelda: "Näed, mul läheb hästi.

"Look, I'm good.

Mul on üks kliimakriis

I have one climate crisis, I don't really need the second one."

ja mul tõesti ei ole veel teist juurde vaja."

(Laughter)

But this is a crisis of, not natural resources --

Aga see ei ole mitte looduslike ressursside kriis,

kuigi ma usun et see on tõsi,

though I believe that's true --

but a crisis of human resources.

vaid inimressursside kriis.

I believe fundamentally,

Ma usun kindlalt,

as many speakers have said during the past few days,

just nagu mitmed eelkõnelejad nende viimase paari päeva jooksul,

et me kasutame liig vähe

that we make very poor use of our talents.

oma andeid.

Very many people go through their whole lives

Paljud inimesed lähevad läbi terve elu

having no real sense of what their talents may be,

teadmata, mis nende tõelised anded on

or if they have any to speak of.

või kas neid üldse on.

Ma olen kohanud igasuguseid inimesi,

I meet all kinds of people

who don't think they're really good at anything.

kes leiavad, et nad ei ole mitte milleski head.

Actually, I kind of divide the world into two groups now.

Ausaltöeldes jaotan ma nüüd maailma kahte gruppi.

Jeremy Bentham, the great utilitarian philosopher,

Jeremy Bentham, suur utilitaarne filosoof,

once spiked this argument.

tõi kord välja järgneva väite.

He said, "There are two types of people in this world:

Ta ütles: " Maailmas on kahte sorti inimesi,

those who divide the world into two types

need, kes jagavad maailma kaheks

and those who do not."

ja need, kes seda ei tee."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Well, I do.

Mina, niisiis, teen seda.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

I meet all kinds of people who don't enjoy what they do.

Ma kohtun igasugu erinevate inimestega,

kes ei naudi seda, mida nad teevad.

They simply go through their lives getting on with it.

Nad lähevad läbi elu

sellega lihtsalt edasi minnes.

They get no great pleasure from what they do.

Nad ei saa mingit suurt naudingut sellest, mida nad teevad.

They endure it rather than enjoy it,

Nad kannatavad selle ära, mitte ei naudi seda

and wait for the weekend.

ning ootavad nädalavahetust.

But I also meet people

Aga ma kohtun ka inimestega,

who love what they do and couldn't imagine doing anything else.

kes armastavad seda, mida nad teevad

ja kes ei kujutaks ette millegi muu tegemist.

If you said, "Don't do this anymore,"

Kui neile öelda:"Ära tee seda enam," nad ei saaks aru, millest sa räägid.

they'd wonder what you're talking about.

Sest see ei ole ainult see, mida nad teevad, see on see, kes nad on. Nad ütlevad:

It isn't what they do, it's who they are.

They say, "But this is me, you know.

"See olen mina, kas tead.

It would be foolish to abandon this,

Minust oleks rumal seda hüljata, sest

because it speaks to my most authentic self."

see ongi mu kõige sügavam "mina".

And it's not true of enough people.

Ja see ei ole mitte väga paljude inimeste puhul nii.

In fact, on the contrary, I think it's still true of a minority of people.

Ausaltöeldes, ma pigem arvan, et

see on nii vähemuse puhul.

And I think there are many possible explanations for it.

Ja ma arvan, et sellele on

mitmeid võimalikke seletusi.

And high among them is education,

Ja üks tõenäolisemaid neist

on haridus,

because education, in a way,

sest omal viisil haridus

ajab väga paljusid inimesi

dislocates very many people from their natural talents.

nende loomulikest annetest eemale.

Ja inimressursid on nagu loodusressursid,

And human resources are like natural resources;

nad on tihti sügavale maetud.

they're often buried deep.

You have to go looking for them,

Neid peab otsima.

they're not just lying around on the surface.

Nad ei vedele niisama maas.

You have to create the circumstances where they show themselves.

Neile peab looma soodsad tingimused, et nad saaksid ennast näidata.

And you might imagine education would be the way that happens,

Ja me võime ju arvata,

et läbi hariduse see ka juhtub.

but too often, it's not.

Aga väga tihti ei ole see nii.

Every education system in the world is being reformed at the moment

Iga haridussüsteemi maailmas

reformitakse hetkel.

and it's not enough.

Aga see ei ole piisav.

Reform is no use anymore,

Reformist ei ole enam kasu,

sest see on lihtsalt katkise mudeli arendamine.

because that's simply improving a broken model.

Mida meil aga vaja on -

What we need --

and the word's been used many times in the past few days --

ja seda sõna on viimase paari päeva jooksul korduvalt kasutatud -

ei ole mitte evolutsioon,

is not evolution,

vaid revolutsioon hariduses.

but a revolution in education.

Seda peab muutma

This has to be transformed into something else.

millekski muuks.

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

One of the real challenges is to innovate fundamentally in education.

Üks suuremaid väljakutseid

on uuendada haridust

põhjalikult.

Innovation is hard,

Reformimine on raske,

because it means doing something that people don't find very easy,

sest see tähendab millegi tegemist,

mida enamus inimestest ei leia väga kerge olevat.

for the most part.

See tähendab millegi vaidlustamist, mida me enesestmõistetavaks peame,

It means challenging what we take for granted,

things that we think are obvious.

asjad, mida me võtame ilmselgetena.

The great problem for reform or transformation

Suureks probleemiks reformi

või muutumise juures

is the tyranny of common sense.

on terve mõistuse türannia -

asjad, mille puhul inimesed mõtlevad:

Things that people think,

"It can't be done differently, that's how it's done."

"Seda ei saa teha kuidagi teisiti, sest see on viis, kuidas seda tehakse."

Hiljuti juhtusin lugema tsitaati Abraham Lincolnilt,

I came across a great quote recently from Abraham Lincoln,

who I thought you'd be pleased to have quoted at this point.

kelle tsitaati minu arvamist mööda teile praegusel hetkel meeldiks kuulda.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

He said this in December 1862 to the second annual meeting of Congress.

Ta ütles seda 1862. aasta detsembris

Kongressi teisel aastakogunemisel.

I ought to explain that I have no idea what was happening at the time.

Ma peaks selgituseks ütlema, et mul ei ole aimugi, mis sel ajal juhtus.

We don't teach American history in Britain.

Meil Suurbritannias Ameerika ajalugu ei õpetata.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

We suppress it. You know, this is our policy.

Me vaikime selle maha. See on meie põhimõte.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

No doubt, something fascinating was happening then,

Niisiis, ilma igasugu kahtluseta juhtus 1862. aasta detsembris midagi võluvat,

which the Americans among us will be aware of.

millest meie keskel olevad ameeriklased

teadlikud on.

But he said this:

Aga ta ütles seda:

"The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present.

"Dogmad

vaiksest minevikust

ei vasta tormisele olevikule.

Olukord

The occasion is piled high with difficulty,

on kõrge raskuste koorma all

and we must rise with the occasion."

ja me peame olukorraga koos tõusma."

Ma armastan seda.

I love that.

Not rise to it, rise with it.

Mitte selleni tõusma vaid sellega.

"As our case is new,

"Kuna meie juhtum on uus,

so we must think anew and act anew.

peame me ka mõtlema uutmoodi

ning käituma uutmoodi.

We must disenthrall ourselves,

Me peame end vabastama orjastusest

and then we shall save our country."

ja siis me alles päästame oma maa."

I love that word, "disenthrall."

Mulle meeldib see sõnapaar "orjastusest vabastama"

You know what it means?

Kas teate, mida see tähendab?

That there are ideas that all of us are enthralled to,

Et on ideid, mille orjastuses me kõik oleme.

which we simply take for granted as the natural order of things,

Mida me lihtsalt enesestmõistetavatena võtame.

Nagu asjade loomulik käik, viis kuidas asjad on.

the way things are.

And many of our ideas have been formed,

Ja paljud meie ideedest

on vormitud mitte selleks, et neist oleks kasu selle sajandi asjaoludega hakkama saamisel

not to meet the circumstances of this century,

but to cope with the circumstances of previous centuries.

vaid selleks, et toime tulla möödunud sajandite asjaoludega.

But our minds are still hypnotized by them,

Aga meie meeled on ikka veel neist hüpnotiseeritud.

and we have to disenthrall ourselves of some of them.

Ja me peame osalt end nende orjastusest vabastama.

Now, doing this is easier said than done.

Sellest on muidugi kergem rääkida, kui konkreetselt midagi ära teha.

It's very hard to know, by the way, what it is you take for granted.

Muuseas, on väga raske teada saada, mida me enesestmõistetavaks peame.

And the reason is that you take it for granted.

Ja selle põhjuseks on, et me seda enesestmõistetavaks peame.

(Laughter)

Niisiis, lubage mul küsida teilt midagi, mida te võite võtta enesestmõistetavalt.

Let me ask you something you may take for granted.

How many of you here are over the age of 25?

Kui paljud teist siin on üle 25 aasta vanad?

That's not what you take for granted, I'm sure you're familiar with that.

See ei ole see, mida ma arvan, et te enesestmõistetavaks võite pidada.

Ma olen kindel, et te olete sellega juba tuttavad.

Are there any people here under the age of 25?

Kas siis on kedagi, kes on noorem kui 25 aastat?

Väga hea. Nüüd need, kes on üle 25,

Great. Now, those over 25,

could you put your hands up if you're wearing your wristwatch?

kas võiksid tõsta käed need, kes kannavad käekella?

See on suur osa meist, kas pole?

Now that's a great deal of us, isn't it?

Ask a room full of teenagers the same thing.

Küsi toatäielt teismelistelt sedasama asja.

Teenagers do not wear wristwatches.

Teismelised ei kanna käekellasid.

I don't mean they can't,

Ma ei mõtle sellega, et nad ei saa või et nad ei tohi,

they just often choose not to.

nad lihtsalt tihti valivad seda mitte teha.

And the reason is we were brought up in a pre-digital culture,

Ja põhjuseks, kas teate, on see, et me oleme üles kasvanud

digitaliseerumise eelsel ajal, need meist, kes on üle 25 aasta vanad.

those of us over 25.

And so for us, if you want to know the time,

Ja meie jaoks, kui me tahame teada aega,

you have to wear something to tell it.

tuleb midagi kanda, mis seda ütleb.

Kids now live in a world which is digitized,

Tänapäeva lapsed elavad digitaliseeritud maailmas

and the time, for them, is everywhere.

ja nende jaoks on aeg kõikjal.

They see no reason to do this.

Nad ei näe ühtegi põhjust, et seda teha.

And by the way, you don't need either;

Ja muuseas, seda ei olegi üldse vaja teha,

it's just that you've always done it and you carry on doing it.

asi on lihtsalt selles, et me oleme seda alati teinud ja me lihtsalt jätkame seda.

My daughter never wears a watch, my daughter Kate, who's 20.

Mu tütar ei kanna kunagi käekella, mu tütar Kate, kes on 20.

She doesn't see the point.

Ta ei näe sel mõtet.

As she says,

Ja ta ütleb: "See on ühe ainsa funktsiooniga seade."

"It's a single-function device."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

"Like, how lame is that?"

"Kui mõttetu saab üks asi üldse olla?"

And I say, "No, no, it tells the date as well."

Ja ma ütlen: "Ei, ei, see ütleb kuupäeva ka."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

"It has multiple functions."

"Sel on mitu funktsiooni"

(Laughter)

But, you see, there are things we're enthralled to in education.

Aga nagu te näete, on aspekte hariduses, mis on meid orjastanud.

Ma toon teile paar näidet.

A couple of examples.

One of them is the idea of linearity:

Üks neis on idee sirgjoonelisusest,

that it starts here and you go through a track

Et see algab siin ja kui jälgida täpselt rada

and if you do everything right,

ning teha kõike õigesti, jõutaksegi kohta,

you will end up set for the rest of your life.

kus kõik on terveks eluks paika pandud.

Everybody who's spoken at TED has told us implicitly,

Kõik, kes on TED-i raames kõnelenud, on meile rääkinud piltlikult

or sometimes explicitly, a different story:

või mõnikord ka otse, hoopis vastupidisest,

that life is not linear; it's organic.

et elu ei ole mitte sirgejooneline vaid orgaaniline.

We create our lives symbiotically

Me ehitame oma elud üles sümbiootiliselt

as we explore our talents

kuna me avastame oma andeid

in relation to the circumstances they help to create for us.

sõltuvalt tingimustest.

But, you know, we have become obsessed with this linear narrative.

Aga kas teate, meile on saanud kinnisideeks

see sirgjooneline narratiiv.

And probably the pinnacle for education is getting you to college.

Ja ilmselt haridussüsteemi tipp

on pääs ülikooli.

I think we are obsessed with getting people to college.

Ma arvan, et meie kinnisideeks on ajada inimesi ülikoolidesse,

Certain sorts of college.

kindlat sorti ülikoolidesse.

I don't mean you shouldn't go, but not everybody needs to go,

Ma ei pea silmas, et me ei peaks minema ülikooli, aga mitte kõik ei pea sinna minema.

or go now.

Ja mitte kõik ei pea minema nüüd.

Maybe they go later, not right away.

Võib-olla lähevad nad hiljem, mitte kohe praegu.

And I was up in San Francisco a while ago doing a book signing.

Ma olin mõnda aega tagasi San Franciscos,

kus jagasin oma raamatu autogramme.

There was this guy buying a book, he was in his 30s.

Seal oli üks kolmekümnendates mees, kes oli ostnud mu raamatu.

I said, "What do you do?"

Ma küsisin talt: "Mis ametit Sa pead?"

And he said, "I'm a fireman."

Ja ta ütles: "Ma olen tuletõrjuja."

I asked, "How long have you been a fireman?"

Ma küsisin: "Kui kaua Sa oled juba tuletõrjuja olnud?"

"Always. I've always been a fireman."

Ta vastas: "Alati, ma olen alati olnud tuletõrjuja."

Ja ma küsisin: "No, millal Sa siis otsustasid?"

"Well, when did you decide?" He said, "As a kid.

Mille peale tavastas: "Lapsena." Ta ütles: "Koolis oli see probleemiks,

Actually, it was a problem for me at school,

because at school, everybody wanted to be a fireman."

sest koolis tahavad ju kõik tuletõrjujaks saada."

(Laughter)

"Aga mina TAHTSIN tuletõrjujaks saada," ütles ta.

He said, "But I wanted to be a fireman."

Ja ta ütles: "Kui õppisin viimases klassis

And he said, "When I got to the senior year of school,

my teachers didn't take it seriously.

ei võtnud õpetajad mu soovi tõsiselt.

This one teacher didn't take it seriously.

Eriti umbusklik oli selle suhtes üks õpetaja.

He said I was throwing my life away

Ta ütles, et raiskan oma elu,

if that's all I chose to do with it;

kui see ongi kõik, mis ma otsustan sellega teha,

that I should go to college, I should become a professional person,

et ma pidanuks minema ülikooli ja saama haritud inimeseks,

that I had great potential

kuna tema arvates oli mul selleks palju potentsiaali

and I was wasting my talent to do that."

ning et tuletõrjujaks saamine olnuks talendi raiskamine."

He said, "It was humiliating.

Ta ütles: "See kõik oli väga alandav,

It was in front of the whole class and I felt dreadful.

sest õpetaja ütles oma arvamust terve klassi ees, mis pani mind end väga halvasti tundma.

But it's what I wanted, and as soon as I left school,

Aga kuna tuletõrjujaks saamine oli see, mida ma tahtsin, siis peagi pärast kooli lõppu

I applied to the fire service and I was accepted.

esitasingi taotluse tuletõrjele ja mind võeti vastu."

You know, I was thinking about that guy recently,

Ja ta ütles: "Kas tead, ma just enne mõtlesin sellest õpetajast,

just a few minutes ago when you were speaking, about this teacher,

just paari minuti eest, kui Sa loengut pidasid,

because six months ago, I saved his life."

sest kuue kuu eest

ma päästsin ta elu."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Ta ütles: "Kunagine õpetaja oli sattunud autoõnnetusse,

He said, "He was in a car wreck, and I pulled him out, gave him CPR,

ma tõmbasin ta välja, tegin talle kunstlikku hingamist,

and I saved his wife's life as well."

ning päästsin ka ta naise elu."

He said, "I think he thinks better of me now."

Ja ta ütles: "Ma arvan, et õpetajal on minust nüüd parem arvamus."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

You know, to me,

Kas teate, minu jaoks

human communities depend upon a diversity of talent,

sõltuvad inimühiskonnad

annete mitmekesisusest,

not a singular conception of ability.

mitte erilisest nägemusest võimekuse kohta.

And at the heart of our challenges --

Ja meie väljakutsete sisus -

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

At the heart of the challenge

Väljakutse sisuks

is to reconstitute our sense of ability and of intelligence.

on uuesti moodustada võimekuse

ja intelligentsi meel.

This linearity thing is a problem.

See sirgjoongelisuse asi on probleemiks.

Kui ma L.A.-sse kolisin

When I arrived in L.A. about nine years ago,

umbes üheksa aastat tagasi,

I came across a policy statement --

juhtusin ma nägema üht poliitilist lööklauset,

idee poolest väga heade kavatsustega,

very well-intentioned --

which said, "College begins in kindergarten."

mis ütles: "Ülikool algab lasteaias."

No, it doesn't.

Ei alga.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

It doesn't.

Tõesti ei alga.

If we had time, I could go into this, but we don't.

Kui meil oleks aega, võiksin sellesse teemasse sügavamalt süüvida, aga meil ei ole aega.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Kindergarten begins in kindergarten.

Lasteaias algab lasteaed.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Üks mu sõber ütles kord:

A friend of mine once said,

"A three year-old is not half a six year-old."

"Kolmeaastane ei ole pool kuueaastasest."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

They're three.

Nad on ju ainult kolmeaastased.

But as we just heard in this last session,

Aga nagu me eelmisel loengul kuulsime,

there's such competition now to get into kindergarten --

on praegusel hetkel suur konkurents, et saada laps lasteaeda,

to get to the right kindergarten --

et saada ta õigesse lasteaeda,

that people are being interviewed for it at three.

et kolmeaastaseid lapsi interviueeritakse selle tarvis.

Lapsed, kes istuvad pettunud spetsialistide nõukogu ees,

Kids sitting in front of unimpressed panels,

oma elulookirjeldustega,

you know, with their resumes --

(Laughter)

(Naer)

Flicking through and saying, "What, this is it?"

kes seda läbi lapates küsivad: "Kas see ongi kõik?"

(Laughter)

(Naer)

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

"You've been around for 36 months, and this is it?"

"Sa oled siin juba viimased 36 kuud ja see ongi kõik?"

(Laughter)

(Naer)

"You've achieved nothing -- commit.

"Sa ei ole mitte midagi saavutanud ega korda saatnud.

(Laughter)

Spent the first six months breastfeeding, I can see."

Sa veetsid esimesed kuus kuud olles rinnaga toidetav, nii näen seda mina."

(Laughter)

(Naer)

See, it's outrageous as a conception.

See on pöörane idee, aga see veetleb inimesi.

The other big issue is conformity.

Teine suur probleem on kuulekus.

We have built our education systems on the model of fast food.

Me oleme ehitanud oma koolisüsteemid üles

kiirtoidu mudelile.

This is something Jamie Oliver talked about the other day.

Sellest rääkis ka Jamie Oliver mõni aeg tagasi.

There are two models of quality assurance in catering.

Toitlustuses on kaks mudelit kvaliteedi garantiiks.

Üks on kiirtoit,

One is fast food, where everything is standardized.

kus kõik on standardiseeritud.

The other is like Zagat and Michelin restaurants,

Teine on see, mille alla käivad näiteks Zagati ja Michelini restoranid,

where everything is not standardized,

kus kõik ei ole standardiseeritud,

they're customized to local circumstances.

nad on kohandatud vastavalt kohalikele tingimustele.

And we have sold ourselves into a fast-food model of education,

Ja mis puudutab haridust, oleme me endid müünud kiirtoidu mudelile.

and it's impoverishing our spirit and our energies

Ja see laostab meie hinge ja meie energiaid

as much as fast food is depleting our physical bodies.

just niisamuti kui kiirtoit laastab meie füüsilisi kehasid.

(Aplaus)

(Applause)

Mulle tundub, et peame siinkohal mõne asja selgeks tegema.

We have to recognize a couple of things here.

Üks on see, et inimtalent on tohutult erinev.

One is that human talent is tremendously diverse.

People have very different aptitudes.

Inimestel on väga erinevaid oskusi.

I worked out recently that I was given a guitar as a kid

Ma mõistsin hiljuti, et

mulle kingiti lapsena kitarr

at about the same time that Eric Clapton got his first guitar.

umbes samal ajal kui Eric Clapton sai oma esimese kitarri.

(Laughter)

It worked out for Eric, that's all I'm saying.

Ericul see õnnestus, see on ainus, mida ma sellega öelda tahan.

(Laughter)

(Naer)

In a way --

Ühel või teisel põhjusel minul see ei õnnestunud.

it did not for me.

I could not get this thing to work

Ma lihtsalt ei saanud seda asja tööle

no matter how often or how hard I blew into it.

hoolimata sellest kui tihti ja kui tugevasti ma sellesse puhusin.

It just wouldn't work.

See lihtsat ei töötanud.

(Laughter)

Aga selles ei olegi asi.

But it's not only about that.

It's about passion.

Asi on kires.

Often, people are good at things they don't really care for.

Tihti on inimesed head asjades, millest nad tegelikult ei hooligi väga.

Asi on kires

It's about passion,

and what excites our spirit and our energy.

ja selles, mis meie hinge ja energiat kõige rohkem ergutab.

And if you're doing the thing that you love to do, that you're good at,

Ja kui teha midagi, mida sa armastad ja milles sa oled hea

time takes a different course entirely.

võtab aeg lõpuks ikka õige kursi.

My wife's just finished writing a novel,

Mu naine just lõpetas romaani kirjutamise,

and I think it's a great book,

ja ma arvan, et see on suurepärane raamat,

but she disappears for hours on end.

ning ta kaob pidevalt tundideks.

You know this, if you're doing something you love,

Teate seda ju isegi, et kui teete midagi mida armastate,

an hour feels like five minutes.

tundub tund viie minutina.

If you're doing something that doesn't resonate with your spirit,

Kui teete aga midagi, mis ei toeta teie hinge,

tunduvad viis minutit tunnina.

five minutes feels like an hour.

And the reason so many people are opting out of education

Ja põhjus, miks nii paljud inimesed otsustavad haridusest loobuda

is because it doesn't feed their spirit,

on, see, et see ei toida nende hinge,

it doesn't feed their energy or their passion.

see ei toida nende energiat ega kirge.

Nii, et ma arvan, et meil on vaja muuta metafoore.

So I think we have to change metaphors.

We have to go from what is essentially an industrial model of education,

Me peame liikuma eemale haridusest, mis pärineb tööstuslikst mudelist,

tootmismudelist,

a manufacturing model,

which is based on linearity and conformity and batching people.

mis põhineb sirgjoonelisusel

ja kuulekusel ning inimeste töötlemisel.

We have to move to a model

Me peame liikuma mudeli suunas,

that is based more on principles of agriculture.

mis põhineb rohkem põllumajanduslikel põhimõtetel.

We have to recognize

Me peame mõistma, et inimlik õitseng

that human flourishing is not a mechanical process;

ei ole mehaaniline vaid

it's an organic process.

orgaaniline protsess.

And you cannot predict the outcome of human development.

Ja ei saa ette prognoosida inimliku arengu tulemust;

kõik, mida me saame teha, just nagu farmerid.

All you can do, like a farmer, is create the conditions

on luua tingimused, mille käigus

under which they will begin to flourish.

inimesed puhkevad õitsele.

So when we look at reforming education and transforming it,

Niisiis, kui me vaatleme hariduse reformimist ja selle muutmist,

it isn't like cloning a system.

siis näeme, et see ei ole nagu süsteemi kloonimine.

There are great ones, like KIPP's; it's a great system.

On olemas häid süsteeme nagu KIPP (Knowledge Is Power Program).

There are many great models.

On olemas palju suurepäraseid mudeleid.

It's about customizing to your circumstances

Asi on kohandamises meie tingimustele,

and personalizing education to the people you're actually teaching.

ja hariduse muutmises isikupärasemaks

täpselt nende inimeste jaoks, keda parasjagu õpetatakse.

And doing that, I think, is the answer to the future

Ja seda tehes, ma arvan

on leitud ka vastus tuleviku jaoks,

because it's not about scaling a new solution;

sest asi ei ole uute lahenduste ümberarvestamises;

it's about creating a movement in education

asi on liikumise loomises hariduses,

in which people develop their own solutions,

mille raames inimesed ise arendavad omaenda lahendusi,

but with external support based on a personalized curriculum.

aga seda juba välispidise abiga, mis põhineb isikupärastatud õppekaval.

Now in this room,

Praegu, selles ruumis on

there are people who represent extraordinary resources in business,

inimesi, kel on

erakordseid võimeid äris,

in multimedia, in the Internet.

multimeedias, internetis.

These technologies,

Need tehnoloogiad

combined with the extraordinary talents of teachers,

kombineerituna õpetajate erakordsete annetega

provide an opportunity to revolutionize education.

loovad võimaluse revolutsiooniks hariduses.

And I urge you to get involved in it

Ja ma õhutan teid selles kaasa lööma,

sest see on eluline, mitte ainult meile endile,

because it's vital, not just to ourselves, but to the future of our children.

vaid ka meie laste tulevikule.

But we have to change from the industrial model

Aga me peame muutuma tööstuslikult mudelilt

põllumajanduslikule mudelile,

to an agricultural model,

where each school can be flourishing tomorrow.

kus iga kool võib õitsele hakata juba homme.

That's where children experience life.

See on see, kus lapsed kogevad elu.

Or at home, if that's what they choose,

Või kodudes, kui nad on otsustanud oma hariduse seal saada

to be educated with their families or friends.

koos oma pere või sõpradega.

There's been a lot of talk about dreams over the course of these few days.

Palju on räägitud unistustest

nende viimase paari päeva jooksul.

And I wanted to just very quickly --

Ja ma tahaksin lihtsalt väga kiiresti -

I was very struck by Natalie Merchant's songs last night,

Ma olin väga liigutatud Natalie Merchanti lauludest eile õhtul,

recovering old poems.

ta taaselustab vanu luuletusi.

I wanted to read you a quick, very short poem

Ma tahaksin teile lugeda kiiresti ühe väga lühikese luuletuse

from W. B. Yeats, who some of you may know.

W.B. Yeatsilt, keda osad teist võivad teada.

He wrote this to his love, Maud Gonne,

Ta kirjutas järgneva oma armastatule

Maud Gonne'ile,

and he was bewailing the fact

ja Yeats halas selle üle,

that he couldn't really give her what he thought she wanted from him.

et ta ei saa oma armsamale anda, mida ta neiule soovis.

And he says, "I've got something else, but it may not be for you."

Ja ta ütles: "Mul on midagi muud, mis ei pruugi olla Sinu jaoks."

He says this:

Yeates ütleb järgnevalt:

"Had I the heavens' embroidered cloths,

"Kui mul oleks taevaste jagu tikitud kangaid,

Enwrought with gold and silver light,

sepistatud kulla

ja hõbeda valgusega,

The blue and the dim and the dark cloths

Siniseid ja sumedaid

ja tumedaid kangaid

Of night and light and the half-light,

öölt ja valguselt ning pool-valguselt,

Ma laotaksin need kangad Su jalge alla.

I would spread the cloths under your feet:

Aga kuna ma olen vaene,

But I, being poor, have only my dreams;

on mul ainult mu unistused.

I have spread my dreams under your feet;

Ma olen laotanud oma unistused Su jalge alla;

Sammu pehmelt,

Tread softly

because you tread on my dreams."

sest Sa jalutad mu unistustel."

And every day, everywhere,

Ja iga päev, igalpool,

our children spread their dreams beneath our feet.

laotavad meie lapsed oma unistused meie jalge alla.

And we should tread softly.

Ja me peaksime sammuma pehmelt.

Thank you.

Tänan teid.

(Applause)

(Aplaus)

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

Thank you.

(Applause)

Tänan teid väga.