Does money make you mean? | Paul Piff

Prevodilac: Mile Živković Lektor: Aniko Kovac

I want you to, for a moment,

Želim da na trenutak

pomislite na učestvovanje u igri Monopola,

think about playing a game of Monopoly.

osim što u ovoj igri, ta kombinacija

Except in this game, that combination of skill, talent and luck

veštine, talenta i sreće

that helped earn you success in games, as in life,

koji vam pomažu da uspete u igrama, kao i u životu,

postaje nebitna,

has been rendered irrelevant,

because this game's been rigged,

jer je igra nameštena

and you've got the upper hand.

i vi imate prednost.

You've got more money,

Imate više novca,

more opportunities to move around the board,

više prilika za kretanje po tabli

i više pristupa resursima.

and more access to resources.

And as you think about that experience,

Dok razmišljate o tom iskustvu,

želim da se zapitate,

I want you to ask yourself:

How might that experience of being a privileged player in a rigged game

kako bi to iskustvo kada ste

privilegovani igrač u nameštenoj igri

change the way you think about yourself

promenilo način na koji mislite o sebi

i ponašate se prema drugom igraču?

and regard that other player?

So, we ran a study on the UC Berkeley campus

Sproveli smo istraživanje na kampusu univerziteta Berkli

kako bismo ispitali upravo to pitanje.

to look at exactly that question.

We brought in more than 100 pairs of strangers into the lab,

Doveli smo više od 100 parova

stranaca u laboratoriju

and with the flip of a coin,

i bacanjem novčića

randomly assigned one of the two to be a rich player in a rigged game.

nasumično odredili da jedan od to dvoje

bude bogati igrač u nameštenoj igri.

They got two times as much money;

Dobili su duplo više novca.

when they passed Go, they collected twice the salary;

Kada su prošli polje "Start",

dobili su duplo veću platu

and they got to roll both dice instead of one,

i mogli su da bacaju dve kockice umesto jedne,

so they got to move around the board a lot more.

tako da su mogli mnogo više da se kreću po tabli.

(Laughter)

(Smeh)

Tokom 15 minuta,

And over the course of 15 minutes,

we watched through hidden cameras what happened.

preko skrivenih kamera smo posmatrali šta se dešavalo.

What I want to do today, for the first time,

Danas po prvi put želim

da vam pokažem malo onoga što smo videli.

is show you a little bit of what we saw.

You'll to have to pardon the sound quality,

Oprostićete nam zbog kvaliteta zvuka

because again, these were hidden cameras.

u nekim slučajevima, jer su to ipak bile skrivene kamere.

So we've provided subtitles.

Stoga smo obezbedili titlove.

[Video] Rich Player: How many 500s did you have?

Bogati igrač: "Koliko imaš novčanica od 500?"

Siromašni: "Samo jednu."

Poor Player: Just one.

RP: Are you serious? PP: Yeah.

Bogati: "Ozbiljno?" Siromašni: "Da."

RP: I have three. (Laughs) I don't know why they gave me so much.

Bogati: "Ja imam tri. (Smeje se)

Ne znam zašto su mi dali toliko."

Paul Piff: So it was quickly apparent to players that something was up.

Pol Pif: Okej, igračima je ubrzo postalo jasno

da se nešto dešava.

One person clearly has a lot more money than the other person,

Jedna osoba očito ima dosta više novca

od druge osobe, a ipak

and yet, as the game unfolded,

kako je igra trajala,

videli smo primetne

we saw very notable differences, dramatic differences begin to emerge

i dramatične razlike koje su počele da se pojavljuju

between the two players.

između dva igrača.

The rich player started to move around the board louder,

Bogati igrač

je počeo glasnije da se kreće po tabli,

literally smacking the board with the piece as he went around.

bukvalno udarajući tablu figurom

dok se kretao.

(Game piece smacks board)

We were more likely to see signs of dominance

Kod bogatih igrača bilo je verovatnije da se vide

and nonverbal signs, displays of power

znaci dominacije,

neverbalni znaci,

and celebration among the rich players.

pokazivanje moći i slavljenje.

We had a bowl of pretzels positioned off to the side.

Sa strane smo stavili činiju sa perecama.

Nalazi se u donjem desnom ćošku.

It's on the bottom right corner.

That allowed us to watch participants' consummatory behavior.

Ovo nam je omogućilo da gledamo ponašanje igrača u vezi s konzumiranjem.

So we're just tracking how many pretzels participants eat.

Samo pratimo koliko će pereca učesnici pojesti.

[Video] RP: Are those pretzels a trick?

Bogati igrač: "Da li su te perece neki trik?"

PP: I don't know.

Siromašni igrač: "Ne znam."

Paul Piff: OK, so no surprises, people are on to us.

PP: U redu, nije čudno što su nas ljudi skontali.

They wonder what that bowl of pretzels is doing there in the first place.

Pitaju se šta ta činija pereca

uopšte tu radi.

Jedan se čak pita, kao što ste upravo videli,

One even asks, like you just saw,

"Is that bowl of pretzels there as a trick?"

da li je ta činija tu kao trik?

Ipak, uprkos tome, moć situacije

And yet, despite that, the power of the situation

se čini kao da neminovno dominira

seems to inevitably dominate,

and those rich players start to eat more pretzels.

i bogati igrači počinju da jedu više pereca.

(Laughter)

Bogati igrač: "Obožavam perece."

[Video] RP: I love pretzels.

(Laughter)

(Smeh)

PP: I kako igra ide dalje,

Paul Piff: And as the game went on,

one of the really interesting and dramatic patterns

jedan od zaista zanimljivih i dramatičnih šablona

that we observed begin to emerge

za koje smo primetili da se javljaju

je taj da bogati igrači zapravo

was that the rich players actually started to become ruder

počinju da budu nekulturniji prema drugoj osobi,

toward the other person --

sve manje osetljivi prema patnji

less and less sensitive to the plight of those poor, poor players,

tih jadnih, siromašnih igrača

and more and more demonstrative of their material success,

i sve više i više pokazuju

svoj materijalni uspeh,

sa većom verovatnoćom da pokažu kako im dobro ide.

more likely to showcase how well they're doing.

Bogati igrač: "Imam novca za sve."

[Video] RP: I have money ...

(Laughs) I have money for everything.

Siromašni igrač: "A koliko je to?"

PP: How much is that?

RP: You owe me 24 dollars.

Bogati igrač: "Duguješ mi 24 dolara.

You're going to lose all your money soon.

Ubrzo ćeš izgubiti sav svoj novac.

I'll buy it. I have so much money.

Kupiću to. Imam toliko novca.

I have so much money, it takes me forever.

Imam toliko novca da mi treba cela večnost."

RP 2: I'm going to buy out this whole board.

Bogati igrač 2: "Kupiću celu ovu tablu."

RP 3: You're going to run out of money soon.

Bogati igrač 3: "Brzo će ti nestati novca.

I'm pretty much untouchable at this point.

Sada mi ne možeš skoro ništa."

(Laughter)

PP: U redu, evo šta mislim

Paul Piff: And here's what I think was really, really interesting:

da je izuzetno zanimljivo,

a to je kada smo na kraju 15 minuta

it's that, at the end of the 15 minutes,

we asked the players to talk about their experience during the game.

zamolili igrače da pričaju o svom iskustvu tokom igre.

And when the rich players talked about why they had inevitably won

I kada su bogati igrači pričali

o tome zašto su neminovno pobedili

in this rigged game of Monopoly ...

u ovoj nameštenoj igri Monopola -

(Laughter)

(Smeh) -

They talked about what they'd done to buy those different properties

pričali su o tome šta su uradili

kako bi kupili te različite nekretnine

and earn their success in the game.

i zaslužili svoj uspeh u igri

(Laughter)

And they became far less attuned

i postali su dosta manje svesni

različitih svojstava situacije,

to all those different features of the situation --

including that flip of a coin --

uključujući bacanje novčića

that had randomly gotten them into that privileged position

koje ih je nasumično postavilo

na to privilegovano mesto.

in the first place.

And that's a really, really incredible insight

A to je zaista neverovatan uvid

into how the mind makes sense of advantage.

u to kako um daje smisao prednosti.

Ova igra Monopola se može koristiti

Now, this game of Monopoly can be used

as a metaphor for understanding society and its hierarchical structure,

kao metafora za razumevanje društva

i njegove hijerarhijske strukture, gde neki ljudi

wherein some people have a lot of wealth and a lot of status,

imaju dosta novca i uticaja,

and a lot of people don't;

a dosta ljudi ih nema.

they have a lot less wealth and a lot less status

Imaju dosta manje novca i uticaja

and a lot less access to valued resources.

i manje pristupa bitnim resursima.

And what my colleagues and I for the last seven years have been doing

Proteklih sedam godina moje kolege i ja proučavamo

is studying the effects of these kinds of hierarchies.

efekte ovakvih hijerarhija.

What we've been finding across dozens of studies

Kroz desetine istraživanja

i hiljade učesnika širom zemlje pronalazimo

and thousands of participants across this country

is that as a person's levels of wealth increase,

to da kako se nivo nečijeg bogatstva uvećava,

njihove emocije saosećanja i empatije se smanjuju,

their feelings of compassion and empathy go down,

a njihov osećaj prava i zasluge

and their feelings of entitlement, of deservingness,

and their ideology of self-interest increase.

i ideologija sopstvenog interesa rastu.

In surveys, we've found

U istraživanjima smo otkrili da će zapravo

that it's actually wealthier individuals who are more likely to moralize

bogatiji pojedinci sa većom verovatnoćom

da opravdavaju pohlepu kao moralno dobru

greed being good,

and that the pursuit of self-interest is favorable and moral.

i težnju ka sopstvenom interesu

kao poželjnu i moralnu.

Danas želim da pričam

Now, what I want to do today is talk about some of the implications

o nekim implikacijama ove ideologije sopstvenog interesa,

of this ideology self-interest,

talk about why we should care about those implications,

zašto bismo trebali da brinemo o ovim implikacijama

and end with what might be done.

i završiću s time šta bi moglo da se uradi.

Some of the first studies that we ran in this area

Neka od prvih istraživanja koje smo vršili u ovom području

looked at helping behavior,

posmatrala su ponašanja pomaganja,

something social psychologists call "pro-social behavior."

nešto što socijalni psiholozi nazivaju

prosocijalnim ponašanjem.

And we were really interested

Zaista nas je zanimalo ko je više sklon

in who's more likely to offer help to another person:

da ponudi pomoć drugoj osobi,

someone who's rich or someone who's poor.

neko bogat ili neko siromašan.

In one of the studies,

U jednom od istraživanja, bogati i siromašni

we bring rich and poor members of the community into the lab,

članovi zajednice dolaze u laboratoriju

and give each of them the equivalent of 10 dollars.

i svakome damo ekvivalent 10 dolara.

We told the participants they could keep these 10 dollars for themselves,

Učesnicima smo rekli da mogu

tih 10 dolara da zadrže za sebe

ili da podele deo tog novca

or they could share a portion of it, if they wanted to,

ako žele, sa nekim strancem

with a stranger, who's totally anonymous.

koji je potpuno nepoznat.

They'll never meet that stranger; the stranger will never meet them.

Nikada neće sresti tog stranca, niti će stranac sresti njih.

And we just monitor how much people give.

I samo posmatramo koliko ljudi daju.

Individuals who made 25,000, sometimes under 15,000 dollars a year,

Pojedinci koji zarađuju 25 000, a ponekad

i manje od 15 000 dolara godišnje,

gave 44 percent more of their money to the stranger

dali su 44% više svog novca

tom strancu

than did individuals making 150,000, 200,000 dollars a year.

nego pojedinci koji zarađuju 150 000

ili 200 000 dolara godišnje.

We've had people play games

Dali smo ljudima da igraju igre

to see who's more or less likely to cheat

kako bismo videli ko je skloniji varanju

to increase their chances of winning a prize.

kako bi uvećao šanse za dobitak.

In one of the games, we actually rigged a computer

U jednoj od igara, zapravo smo namestili kompjuter

so that die rolls over a certain score were impossible --

kako bi određeni broj na kockicama

bio nemoguć.

You couldn't get above 12 in this game, and yet ...

U ovoj igri niste mogli da dobijete više od 12,

a ipak, što ste bogatiji,

the richer you were, the more likely you were to cheat in this game

veće su šanse da ćete varati u ovoj igri

to earn credits toward a $50 cash prize --

kako biste stekli šansu za novčanu nagradu od 50 dolara,

sometimes by three to four times as much.

ponekad čak 3 do 4 puta veće šanse.

Izveli smo drugo istraživanje gde smo posmatrali

We ran another study

where we looked at whether people would be inclined to take candy

da li bi ljudi bili skloni da uzmu slatkiše

from a jar of candy that we explicitly identified

iz tegle sa slatkišima na kojoj je jasno naznačeno

da su slatkiši za decu -

as being reserved for children --

(Laughter)

(Smeh) -

I'm not kidding -- I know it sounds like I'm making a joke.

sa učesnicima - ne šalim se.

Znam da zvuči kao da se šalim.

We explicitly told participants:

Izričito smo rekli učesnicima

"This candy is for children participating in a developmental lab nearby.

da je ta tegla sa slatkišima za decu koja učestvuju

u razvojnoj laboratoriji u blizini.

They're in studies. This is for them."

Ona su u istraživanju. Ovo je za njih.

And we just monitored how much candy participants took.

I samo smo posmatrali koliko slatkiša su učesnici uzimali.

Participants who felt rich took two times as much candy

Učesnici koji su se osećali bogatim

uzimali su duplo više slatkiša

as participants who felt poor.

od učesnika koji su se osećali siromašno.

We've even studied cars.

Čak smo proučavali automobile,

Not just any cars,

i to ne bilo koje automobile,

nego da li su vozači određenih vrsta automobila

but whether drivers of different kinds of cars

manje ili više skloni da krše zakon.

are more or less inclined to break the law.

In one of these studies,

U jednom od ovih istraživanja posmatrali smo

we looked at whether drivers would stop for a pedestrian

da li će vozači stati pešaku

that we had posed waiting to cross at a crosswalk.

kojeg smo postavili da čeka da pređe na pešačkom prelazu.

U Kaliforniji, kao što znate,

Now in California, as you all know,

jer sam siguran da svi ovo radimo,

because I'm sure we all do this,

it's the law to stop for a pedestrian who's waiting to cross.

po zakonu mora da se stane pešaku koji čeka da pređe ulicu.

So here's an example of how we did it.

Evo primera kako smo to uradili.

That's our confederate off to the left, posing as a pedestrian.

Na levoj strani je naš saradnik

koji se pretvara da je pešak.

He approaches as the red truck successfully stops.

Kako prilazi, crveni kamionet se uspešno zaustavlja.

In typical California fashion,

U tipičnom kalifornijskom stilu, pretiče ga autobus

it's overtaken by the bus who almost runs our pedestrian over.

koji zamalo pregazi našeg pešaka.

(Smeh)

(Laughter)

Now here's an example of a more expensive car,

Evo primera skupljeg automobila,

a Prius, driving through, and a BMW doing the same.

Prijusa, koji prolazi,

i BMW koji radi isto.

So we did this for hundreds of vehicles

Uradili smo ovo za stotine vozila

kroz nekoliko dana,

on several days,

just tracking who stops and who doesn't.

samo prateći ko staje a ko ne.

What we found was as the expensiveness of a car increased ...

Otkrili smo da kako se skupoća

automobila povećava,

(Laughter)

the drivers' tendencies to break the law increased as well.

povećava se i sklonost vozača

da prekrši zakon.

None of the cars -- none of the cars --

Nijedan od automobila

u najjeftinijoj kategoriji

in our least expensive car category

broke the law.

nije prekršio zakon.

Close to 50 percent of the cars in our most expensive vehicle category

Blizu 50% automobila

u našoj najskupljoj kategoriji

broke the law.

prekršilo je zakon.

We've run other studies,

Sprovodili smo druga istraživanja gde smo otkrli da su

finding that wealthier individuals are more likely to lie in negotiations,

bogatiji pojedinci skloniji da lažu u pregovorima,

to endorse unethical behavior at work,

da podržavaju neetičko ponašanje na poslu

like stealing cash from the cash register,

poput krađe gotovine iz kase,

taking bribes, lying to customers.

uzimanja mita, laganja mušterija.

Now, I don't mean to suggest

Ne želim da sugerišem

that it's only wealthy people who show these patterns of behavior.

da samo bogati ljudi

pokazuju ove šablone ponašanja.

Not at all -- in fact, I think that we all,

Uopšte ne. Zapravo mislim da se svi mi

in our day-to-day, minute-by-minute lives,

u našim svakodnevnim životima

struggle with these competing motivations

borimo sa ovim motivacijama koje se međusobno bore,

of when or if to put our own interests above the interests of other people.

kada i da li da svoj interes stavimo

iznad interesa drugih ljudi.

And that's understandable,

I to je razumljivo,

because the American dream is an idea

jer je američki san ideja

gde svako ima jednake prilike

in which we all have an equal opportunity to succeed and prosper,

da uspe i prosperira,

as long as we apply ourselves and work hard.

dok god se posvetimo tome i naporno radimo,

And a piece of that means that sometimes,

a deo toga podrazumeva da ponekad

you need to put your own interests

morate da stavite sopstveni interes

above the interests and well-being of other people around you.

iznad interesa i dobrostanja ljudi iz vaše okoline.

Ali pronalazimo da

But what we're finding is that the wealthier you are,

što ste bogatiji, to ste i skloniji

the more likely you are to pursue a vision of personal success,

da jurite za vizijom ličnog uspeha,

of achievement and accomplishment,

dostignuća i ostvarivanja,

to the detriment of others around you.

na štetu ljudi u vašoj okolini.

Here I've plotted for you the mean household income

Ovde sam za vas prikazao prosečne prihode po domaćinstvu

za svaku petinu i za 5% vrha populacije

received by each fifth and top five percent of the population

over the last 20 years.

kroz proteklih 20 godina.

In 1993,

1993. razlika između drugačijih

the differences between the different quintiles of the population,

petina populacije što se tiče primanja

in terms of income,

bila je prilično ozbiljna.

are fairly egregious.

It's not difficult to discern that there are differences.

Nije teško da se vidi da razlike postoje.

But over the last 20 years, that significant difference

Ali kroz proteklih 20 godina ta značajna razlika

has become a Grand Canyon of sorts

je postala jedinstveni veliki kanjon

between those at the top and everyone else.

između onih na vrhu i svih ostalih.

In fact, the top 20 percent of our population

Zapravo, 20% vrha populacije

own close to 90 percent of the total wealth in this country.

poseduje skoro 90% ukupnog bogatstva u ovoj zemlji.

We're at unprecedented levels of economic inequality.

Na neviđenom smo nivou

ekonomske nejednakosti.

What that means is that wealth is not only becoming increasingly concentrated

To znači da bogatstvo ne samo da postaje

sve više koncentrisano u rukama odabranih pojedinaca,

in the hands of a select group of individuals,

but the American dream is becoming increasingly unattainable

nego da američki san postaje

sve više nedostižan

za sve veću većinu ljudi.

for an increasing majority of us.

A ako je situacija takva, kao što smo otkrili,

And if it's the case, as we've been finding,

da što ste bogatiji,

that the wealthier you are,

the more entitled you feel to that wealth,

imate veći osećaj prava na to bogatstvo

i skloniji ste da svoj interes činite prioritetom,

and the more likely you are to prioritize your own interests

iznad interesa drugih ljudi,

above the interests of other people,

and be willing to do things to serve that self-interest,

i da ste voljni da radite stvari kako biste služili tom interesu,

well, then, there's no reason to think that those patterns will change.

onda nema razloga da mislimo

da će se ti šabloni promeniti.

Zapravo postoje osnovani razlozi da mislimo

In fact, there's every reason to think that they'll only get worse,

da će se oni samo pogoršati

and that's what it would look like if things just stayed the same,

i tako bi to izgledalo kada bi stvari samo ostale iste,

at the same linear rate, over the next 20 years.

istom linearnom stopom, tokom narednih 20 godina.

Ekonomska nejednakost

Now inequality -- economic inequality --

is something we should all be concerned about,

je nešto što bi trebalo sve da nas brine,

ne samo zbog onih na dnu

and not just because of those at the bottom of the social hierarchy,

društvene hijerarhije,

but because individuals and groups

već zato što pojedinci i grupe

sa dosta ekonomske nejednakosti žive lošije,

with lots of economic inequality do worse ...

not just the people at the bottom, everyone.

i to ne samo oni na dnu, već svako.

Postoji dosta ubedljivih istraživanja

There's a lot of really compelling research

coming out from top labs all over the world,

iz vrhunskih laboratorija širom sveta

showcasing the range of things that are undermined

koja pokazuju niz stvari

koje su potkopane

as economic inequality gets worse.

kako se pogoršava ekonomska nejednakost.

Social mobility, things we really care about,

Društvena mobilnost, stvari do kojih nam je stalo,

fizičko zdravlje, društveno poverenje,

physical health, social trust,

all go down as inequality goes up.

sve se smanjuje kako raste nejednakost.

Similarly, negative things in social collectives and societies,

Slično tome, negativne stvari

u društvenim skupovima i društvima,

poput gojaznosti i nasilja,

things like obesity, and violence,

zatvorske i drugih kazni,

imprisonment, and punishment,

are exacerbated as economic inequality increases.

pogoršavaju se kako raste ekonomska nejednakost.

Again, these are outcomes not just experienced by a few,

Još jednom, ovo su ishodi koje će iskusiti ne samo

nekoliko ljudi, nego koji rezonuju

but that resound across all strata of society.

kroz sve slojeve društva.

Even people at the top experience these outcomes.

Čak i oni na vrhu doživljavaju ove ishode.

Šta da radimo?

So what do we do?

This cascade of self-perpetuating,

Ovaj slap ubitačnih negativnih efekata

pernicious, negative effects

koji se sami nastavljaju

could seem like something that's spun out of control,

se možda čini kao nešto što se otrglo kontroli

and there's nothing we can do about it,

i kao da ne postoji ništa što možemo da uradimo,

certainly nothing we as individuals could do.

svakako ništa kao pojedinci.

But in fact, we've been finding in our own laboratory research

Zapravo, u svom istraživanju

u laboratoriji pronašli smo

that small psychological interventions,

da male psihološke intervencije,

small changes to people's values,

male promene u ljudskim vrednostima

small nudges in certain directions,

malo guranje u određenom pravcu,

mogu da vrate nivo egalitarizma i saosećanja.

can restore levels of egalitarianism and empathy.

For instance, reminding people of the benefits of cooperation

Na primer, podsećanje ljudi

na prednosti saradnje,

prednosti zajednice,

or the advantages of community,

cause wealthier individuals to be just as egalitarian

prouzrokuju da bogatiji pojedinci budu jednako darežljivi

as poor people.

kao siromašni.

In one study, we had people watch a brief video, just 46 seconds long,

U jednom istraživanju ljudima smo dali da pogledaju kratak snimak

od samo 46 sekundi, o siromaštvu u detinjstvu

about childhood poverty

koji je služio kao podsetnik o potrebama drugih

that served as a reminder of the needs of others in the world around them.

u svetu oko njih

i nakon gledanja toga,

And after watching that,

pogledali smo koliko su ljudi bili voljni

we looked at how willing people were to offer up their own time

da ponude svoje vreme strancu

to a stranger presented to them in the lab, who was in distress.

ispred njih u laboratoriji koji je bio u nevolji.

Sat vremena nakon gledanja ovog snimka,

After watching this video, an hour later,

rich people became just as generous of their own time

bogati ljudi postali su jednako darežljivi

što se tiče vremena uloženog da pomognu ovoj osobi,

to help out this other person, a stranger,

strancu, kao neko siromašan,

as someone who's poor,

suggesting that these differences are not innate or categorical,

sugerišući da ove razlike nisu

urođene ili kategorične,

but are so malleable to slight changes in people's values,

nego prilagodljive

blagim promenama u ljudskim vrednostima,

and little nudges of compassion and bumps of empathy.

malom guranju ka saosećanju,

i gurkanju ka empatiji.

And beyond the walls of our lab,

A izvan zidova naše laboratorije,

we're even beginning to see signs of change in society.

počinjemo da primećujemo znakove promene u društvu.

Bill Gates, one of our nation's wealthiest individuals,

Bil Gejts, jedan od najbogatijih pojedinaca u našoj zemlji,

in his Harvard commencement speech,

u svom govoru za početak godine na Harvardu,

talked about the problem of inequality facing society

pričao je o problemu sa kojim se suočava društvo,

as being the most daunting challenge,

gde je nejednakost najveći izazov

and talked about what must be done to combat it,

i pričao je o tome šta mora da se uradi kako bi se borili protiv ovoga,

saying, "Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries --

rekavši: "Najveći uspesi čovečanstva

nisu u otkrićima,

but in how those discoveries are applied

već u tome kako se ta otkrića koriste

to reduce inequity."

da bi se smanjila nejednakost."

And there's the Giving Pledge,

A tu je i Zavet davanja,

in which more than 100 of our nation's wealthiest individuals

gde više od 100 najbogatijih pojedinaca

u našoj zemlji

zaveštava pola svog bogatstva u dobrotvorne svrhe.

are pledging half of their fortunes to charity.

And there's the emergence of dozens of grassroots movements,

A nastaju i brojni

ključni pokreti,

like "We are the 1 percent,"

poput "Mi smo jedan procenat",

"Resource Generation,"

"Generacija resursa"

or "Wealth for Common Good,"

i "Bogatstvo za opšte dobro",

in which the most privileged members of the population,

gde oni najprivilegovaniji

članovi populacije,

members of the one percent and elsewhere,

članovi jednog procenta i drugi,

people who are wealthy,

ljudi koji su bogati

are using their own economic resources,

koriste svoje ekonomske resurse,

odrasli i mladi, to je za mene najimpresivnije,

adults and youth alike -- that's what's most striking to me --

koriste svoje privilegije

leveraging their own privilege, their own economic resources,

svoje ekonomske resurse,

to combat inequality

da bi se borili protiv nejednakosti

by advocating for social policies,

podržavajući društvene politike,

changes in social values

promene u društvenim vrednostima

and changes in people's behavior

i promene u ponašanju ljudi

koje rade protiv njihovog ekonomskog interesa

that work against their own economic interests,

ali koje možda na kraju uspeju da vrate američki san.

but that may ultimately restore the American dream.

Thank you.

Hvala vam.

(Applause)

(Aplauz)