Does money make you mean? | Paul Piff

Translator: Ema Bilbija Zulic Reviewer: Samra Cebiric

I want you to, for a moment,

Zelim da na trenutak

think about playing a game of Monopoly.

zamislite igru monopola,

Except in this game, that combination of skill, talent and luck

u kojoj su kombinacija

vjestine, talenta i srece,

that helped earn you success in games, as in life,

koji inace, kao i u zivotu, znace pobjedu,

ucinjeni beznacajnim,

has been rendered irrelevant,

because this game's been rigged,

zato sto je igra namjestena,

and you've got the upper hand.

a vi imate prednost.

You've got more money,

Imate vise novaca,

more opportunities to move around the board,

vise mogucnosti da se krecete po tabli,

i pristup vecem broju sredstava.

and more access to resources.

And as you think about that experience,

I dok razmisljate o ovom iskustvu,

zelim da se zapitate

I want you to ask yourself:

How might that experience of being a privileged player in a rigged game

kako bi to iskustvo

privilegovanog igraca u namjestenoj igri

change the way you think about yourself

uticalo na vase misljenje o sebi

i na nacin kako se odnosite prema drugom igracu?

and regard that other player?

So, we ran a study on the UC Berkeley campus

Mi na U.C. Berkley kampusu smo pokrenuli studiju

koja se bavi upravo ovim pitanjem.

to look at exactly that question.

We brought in more than 100 pairs of strangers into the lab,

Doveli smo u laboratorij

vise od 100 parova stranaca,

and with the flip of a coin,

i bacanjem novcica

randomly assigned one of the two to be a rich player in a rigged game.

nasumice odredili jednog u svakom paru

da bude bogati igrac u namjestenoj igri.

They got two times as much money;

Oni su dobili dvostruko vise novaca.

when they passed Go, they collected twice the salary;

Kada bi prosli KRENI,

dobili bi dvostruku placu,

and they got to roll both dice instead of one,

a i bili su u mogucnosti da bacajuobadvije kockice a ne samo jednu,

so they got to move around the board a lot more.

tako da su se mnogo vise kretali po tabli.

(Smijeh)

(Laughter)

Tokom 15 minuta,

And over the course of 15 minutes,

we watched through hidden cameras what happened.

sa skrivenim kamerama smo posmatrali sta se desavalo.

What I want to do today, for the first time,

Danas zelim po prvi put

da vam pokazem malo od onoga sto smo vidjeli.

is show you a little bit of what we saw.

You'll to have to pardon the sound quality,

Unaprijed se izvinjavam na kvaliteti zvuka,

u nekim trenucima, jer su u pitanju skrivene kamere.

because again, these were hidden cameras.

So we've provided subtitles.

Zbog toga smo obezbijedili titl.

[Video] Rich Player: How many 500s did you have?

Bogati igrac: Koliko ste novcanica od 500 imali?

Siromasni igrac: Samo jednu.

Poor Player: Just one.

Bogati igrac: Ozbiljno? Siromasni igrac: Da.

RP: Are you serious? PP: Yeah.

Bogati igrac: Ja imam tri. (Smije se)

RP: I have three. (Laughs) I don't know why they gave me so much.

Ne znam zasto su mi dali tako mnogo.

Paul Piff: Ok, igraci su brzo shvatili

Paul Piff: So it was quickly apparent to players that something was up.

da se tu nesto krije.

Jedna osoba ocito ima mnogo vise novaca

One person clearly has a lot more money than the other person,

od druge osobe, ali ipak,

and yet, as the game unfolded,

kako se igra razvija,

uocili smo primjetne razlike

we saw very notable differences, dramatic differences begin to emerge

dramaticne razlike izlaze na povrsinu

between the two players.

izmedu dva igraca.

The rich player started to move around the board louder,

Bogati igrac

se poceo kretati po tabli mnogo glasnije,

literally smacking the board with the piece as he went around.

lupajuci figuricama po tabli

dok se kretao.

(Game piece smacks board)

We were more likely to see signs of dominance

Uocili smo vise znakova dominacije

and nonverbal signs, displays of power

i neverbalnih znakova,

iskazivanja moci

and celebration among the rich players.

i veselja medu bogatim igracima.

We had a bowl of pretzels positioned off to the side.

Postavili smo zdjelu perecavise na jednu stranu.

U donjem desnom uglu.

It's on the bottom right corner.

That allowed us to watch participants' consummatory behavior.

To nam je omogucilo da posmatramokonzumaciju ucesnika.

So we're just tracking how many pretzels participants eat.

Pratimo koliko pereca ucesnici jedu.

[Video] RP: Are those pretzels a trick?

Bogati igrac: Jesu li perece dio trika?

PP: I don't know.

Siromasni igrac: Ne znam.

Paul Piff: OK, so no surprises, people are on to us.

PP: Ok, nisam iznenaden da su nas otkrili.

They wonder what that bowl of pretzels is doing there in the first place.

Pitaju se sta ta zdjela pereca

uopste trazi tu.

Jedan je cak i upitao, kao sto ste upravo vidjeli,

One even asks, like you just saw,

da li je ta zdjela pereca dio trika?

"Is that bowl of pretzels there as a trick?"

Ipak, uprkos tome, cini se da

And yet, despite that, the power of the situation

snaga same situacije neizbjezno dominira,

seems to inevitably dominate,

and those rich players start to eat more pretzels.

i bogati igraci pocinju da jedu vise pereca.

(Laughter)

Bogati igrac: Volim perece.

[Video] RP: I love pretzels.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

PP: I kako se igra razvijala,

Paul Piff: And as the game went on,

one of the really interesting and dramatic patterns

jedan veoma interesantan i dramatican sablon

that we observed begin to emerge

koji smo posmatrali je poceo da se pojavljuje

a to je da su bogati igraci

was that the rich players actually started to become ruder

postali neuctivi prema drugoj osobi,

toward the other person --

sve manje osjetljivi na nepriliku

less and less sensitive to the plight of those poor, poor players,

ovih jadnih, siromasnih igraca,

and more and more demonstrative of their material success,

i da sve vise pokazuju

svoj materijalni uspijeh,

cesce su pokazivali kako im dobro ide.

more likely to showcase how well they're doing.

Bogati igrac: Imam novaca za sve.

[Video] RP: I have money ...

(Laughs) I have money for everything.

Siromasni igrac: Koliko je to?

PP: How much is that?

RP: You owe me 24 dollars.

Bogati igrac: Dugujes mi 24 dolara.

You're going to lose all your money soon.

Izgubit ces sav novac.

I'll buy it. I have so much money.

Kupicu to. Imam puno novaca.

I have so much money, it takes me forever.

Imam toliko novaca da ce mi trebati vjecnost.

RP 2: I'm going to buy out this whole board.

Bogati igrac 2: Kupit cu cijelu tablu.

RP 3: You're going to run out of money soon.

Bogati igrac 3: Uskoro cespotrositi sav novac.

Poprilicno sam nedodirljiv sad.

I'm pretty much untouchable at this point.

(Laughter)

PP: Ok, i evo sta ja mislim

Paul Piff: And here's what I think was really, really interesting:

da je stvarno interesantno

to sto smo nakon 15 minuta igranja,

it's that, at the end of the 15 minutes,

we asked the players to talk about their experience during the game.

pitali igrace da namopisu svoje iskustvo u igri.

And when the rich players talked about why they had inevitably won

Kada su bogati igraci pricali o tome

sta su neizbjezno osvojili

in this rigged game of Monopoly ...

u namjestenoj igri monopola --

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)--

They talked about what they'd done to buy those different properties

o tome sta su sve ucinili da

kupe razne posjede

and earn their success in the game.

i zasluze uspijeh u igri,

(Laughter)

And they became far less attuned

postali su mnogo manje svjesni

svih onih cimbenika situacije,

to all those different features of the situation --

including that flip of a coin --

ukljucujuci bacanje novcica

that had randomly gotten them into that privileged position

koje ih je nasumice dovelo u

privilegovan polozaj.

in the first place.

And that's a really, really incredible insight

A to je stvarno nevjerovatan uvid

into how the mind makes sense of advantage.

u to kako um dozivljava prednost.

Ova igra monopola se moze koristiti

Now, this game of Monopoly can be used

as a metaphor for understanding society and its hierarchical structure,

kao metafora za razumijevanje drustva

njegove hijerarhijske strukture, u kojoj neki ljudi

wherein some people have a lot of wealth and a lot of status,

imaju mnogo bogastva i statusa,

and a lot of people don't;

a mnogi ljudi nemaju.

they have a lot less wealth and a lot less status

Oni imaju knogo manje bogastva i statusa

and a lot less access to valued resources.

i mnogo manje pristupa vrijednim materijalnim izvorima.

And what my colleagues and I for the last seven years have been doing

Ono sto smo moje kolege i jau zadnjih sedam godina radili

is studying the effects of these kinds of hierarchies.

je izucavanje efekata ovakvih hijerarhija.

What we've been finding across dozens of studies

Ono sto smo saznali kroz nekoliko desetina studija

i na hiljade ucesnika sirom drzave

and thousands of participants across this country

is that as a person's levels of wealth increase,

je to da kako se osobno bogastvo uvecava,

osjecaj za suosjecanje i empatiju se smanjuje,

their feelings of compassion and empathy go down,

a da se osjecaj na pravo zasluge,

and their feelings of entitlement, of deservingness,

and their ideology of self-interest increase.

i ideologija samointeresa povecavaju.

In surveys, we've found

Saznali smo u istrazivanjima da

that it's actually wealthier individuals who are more likely to moralize

bogatije individue mnogo cesce

moralizuju pohlepu kao nesto dobro,

greed being good,

and that the pursuit of self-interest is favorable and moral.

i da teznja za vlastitim interesom

je dobra i moralna.

A sada zelim da razgovaramo o

Now, what I want to do today is talk about some of the implications

nekim implikacijamaideologije vlastitog interesa,

of this ideology self-interest,

talk about why we should care about those implications,

da razgovaramo zasto bismo trebalibrinuti o tim implikacijama,

i zakljuciti sta bi se moglo uciniti.

and end with what might be done.

Some of the first studies that we ran in this area

Neke od prvih studija koje smo izveli u ovom polju

bavila se pomazucim ponasanjem

looked at helping behavior,

ili kako ga nazivaju psiholozi

something social psychologists call "pro-social behavior."

prosocijalnim ponasanjem.

And we were really interested

Bili smo veoma zainteresovani tko ce prije

in who's more likely to offer help to another person:

ponuditi pomoc drugoj osobi,

someone who's rich or someone who's poor.

netko bogat ili netko siromasan.

In one of the studies,

U jednoj studiji smo u laboratorij doveli

we bring rich and poor members of the community into the lab,

clanove bogatih i siromasnih zajednica

and give each of them the equivalent of 10 dollars.

i svakom ponaosob dali vrijednost jednaku 10 dolara.

We told the participants they could keep these 10 dollars for themselves,

Zatim smo im rekli

da tih 10 dolara mogu zadrzati za sebe,

ili dio podijeliti,

or they could share a portion of it, if they wanted to,

ako to zele, sa nepoznatom osobom

with a stranger, who's totally anonymous.

koja potpuno anonimna.

They'll never meet that stranger; the stranger will never meet them.

Nece nikada upoznati tu osobuniti ce ta osoba upoznati njih.

And we just monitor how much people give.

A zatim smo promatrali koliko je ljudi dalo.

Individuals who made 25,000, sometimes under 15,000 dollars a year,

Osobe koje su zaradivale izmedu

15,000 i 20,000 dolara godisnje,

gave 44 percent more of their money to the stranger

za 44% su davale vise novaca

strancima

than did individuals making 150,000, 200,000 dollars a year.

nego osobe koje su zaradivale izmedu 150,000

i 200,000 dolara godisnje.

We've had people play games

Znali smo davati ljudima da se igraju

to see who's more or less likely to cheat

kako bismo vidjeli tko cesce vara

to increase their chances of winning a prize.

kako bi poboljsao sanse za nagradu.

In one of the games, we actually rigged a computer

U jednoj od igara smo cak i namjestili racunar

so that die rolls over a certain score were impossible --

tako da bacanje kockica preko odredenog iznosa

nije bilo moguce.

You couldn't get above 12 in this game, and yet ...

Niste mogli dobiti vise od 12 u igri,

a ipak, sto ste bogatiji,

the richer you were, the more likely you were to cheat in this game

veca je bila vjerovatnost da cete varati

to earn credits toward a $50 cash prize --

kako biste dobili nagradu od $50,

sometimes by three to four times as much.

negada cak i tri-cetri puta vise.

U drugoj studiji smo izucavali da li su

We ran another study

where we looked at whether people would be inclined to take candy

ljudi vise naklonjeni uzimanju slatkisa

from a jar of candy that we explicitly identified

iz posude na kojoj jasno pise

da je rezervisana za djecu --

as being reserved for children --

(Laughter)

(smijeh) --

I'm not kidding -- I know it sounds like I'm making a joke.

koja ucestvuju -- ne salim se.

Znam da zvuci kao da vam pricam vic.

We explicitly told participants:

Jasno smo rekli ucesnicima

"This candy is for children participating in a developmental lab nearby.

da je posuda sa slatkisima za djecu koja ucestvuju

u razvojnom laboratoriju u blizini.

They're in studies. This is for them."

Trenutno su na casu. ovo je za njih.

And we just monitored how much candy participants took.

A onda smo posmatrali kolikoslatkisa su ucesnici uzeli.

Participants who felt rich took two times as much candy

Oni koji su se osjecali bogatima

su uzeli duplo vise slatkisa

as participants who felt poor.

od ucesnika koji su se osjecali siromasnima.

We've even studied cars.

Cak smo izucavali i automobile,

Not just any cars,

i to ne bilo koje,

nego da li su vozacirazlicitih vrsta automobila

but whether drivers of different kinds of cars

vise ili manje nastrojeni krsenju zakona.

are more or less inclined to break the law.

In one of these studies,

U jednoj od ovih studija,posmatrali smo

we looked at whether drivers would stop for a pedestrian

da li se vozacizaustavljaju pjesacima

that we had posed waiting to cross at a crosswalk.

koje smo postavili dacekaju na pjesackom prijelazu.

U Kaliforniji,kao sto svi znamo,

Now in California, as you all know,

i svi tako i postupamo,

because I'm sure we all do this,

it's the law to stop for a pedestrian who's waiting to cross.

po zakonu je obavezno propustiti pjesakakoji ceka na pjesackom.

So here's an example of how we did it.

Evo primjera kako smo ovo izveli.

That's our confederate off to the left, posing as a pedestrian.

Ovo je nas saucesniksa lijeve strane

u ulozi pjesaka.

He approaches as the red truck successfully stops.

Kada se priblizio,crveni kamio se uspjesno zaustavio.

In typical California fashion,

A na tipican Kalifornijski nacin,pretekao ga je autobus

it's overtaken by the bus who almost runs our pedestrian over.

koji je umalo pregazio pjesaka.

(Smijeh)

(Laughter)

Now here's an example of a more expensive car,

A sada evo primjer sa mnogo skupljim automobilom

a Prius, driving through, and a BMW doing the same.

Prius, koji prolazi,

BMW takoder.

So we did this for hundreds of vehicles

Ucinili smo ovo sa stotinom vozila

tokom nekoliko dana,

on several days,

just tracking who stops and who doesn't.

prateci tko se zaustavljaa tko ne.

What we found was as the expensiveness of a car increased ...

Uocili smo da se vozaceva tendencija za

krsenjem zakona povecava,

(Laughter)

the drivers' tendencies to break the law increased as well.

povecava se i

cijena automobila.

None of the cars -- none of the cars --

N jedan automobil, ni jedan

u nasoj kategoriji najjeftinijih vozila

in our least expensive car category

broke the law.

nije prekrsio zakon.

Close to 50 percent of the cars in our most expensive vehicle category

Skoro 50 posto vozila

u nasoj najskupljoj kategoriji vozila

broke the law.

je prekrsilo zakon.

We've run other studies,

Vrsili smo druge studije i saznali da

finding that wealthier individuals are more likely to lie in negotiations,

imucnije osobe mnogo cescelazu u pregovorima,

to endorse unethical behavior at work,

odobravaju neeticko ponasanje na poslu

like stealing cash from the cash register,

poput krede novca iz kase,

taking bribes, lying to customers.

uzimanja mita, laganja musterija.

Now, I don't mean to suggest

Ne zelim sugerisati

that it's only wealthy people who show these patterns of behavior.

da samo imucni ljudi

pokazuju ovakvo ponasanje.

Not at all -- in fact, I think that we all,

Niposto. Ustvari, mislim dase svi mi,

in our day-to-day, minute-by-minute lives,

u nasim svakidasnjim zivotimaiz minute u minutu,

struggle with these competing motivations

borimo sa ovim dvostrukim motivacijama

of when or if to put our own interests above the interests of other people.

kada i da li da stavimo vlastiti interes

ispred interesa drugih ljudi.

And that's understandable,

A to je razumljivo zato sto

because the American dream is an idea

je Americki san jedna ideja

u kojoj svi mi imamo jednaku priliku

in which we all have an equal opportunity to succeed and prosper,

da uspijemo i napredujemo,

as long as we apply ourselves and work hard.

sve dok se potpuno unesemo u toi vrijedno radimo,

And a piece of that means that sometimes,

a dio toga znaci i da ponekad,

you need to put your own interests

vlastiti interesi dolazi ispred

above the interests and well-being of other people around you.

interesa i dobrobitiljudi oko vas.

Nase saznanje je da

But what we're finding is that the wealthier you are,

sto ste imucniji, veca je mogucnost

the more likely you are to pursue a vision of personal success,

da cete ici za vizijomvlastitog uspjeha,

of achievement and accomplishment,

dostignuca i podviga,

to the detriment of others around you.

na stetu onih oko vas.

Here I've plotted for you the mean household income

Ovo je graf prosjecnogkucnog budeta

kojeg posjeduje svaki peti budeti 5% populacije

received by each fifth and top five percent of the population

over the last 20 years.

u zadnjih 20 godina.

In 1993,

U 1993, razlika izmedu razlicitih

the differences between the different quintiles of the population,

kvintila populacije, kada je dohodak u pitanju,

in terms of income,

su jednostavno necuvene.

are fairly egregious.

It's not difficult to discern that there are differences.

Nije tesko uvidjeti razlike.

But over the last 20 years, that significant difference

Ali tokom 20 godina,te znacajne razlike

has become a Grand Canyon of sorts

su postale veliki kanjon izmedu

between those at the top and everyone else.

onih na vrhu i svih ostalih.

In fact, the top 20 percent of our population

Ustvari, 20% populacije na vrhu

own close to 90 percent of the total wealth in this country.

posjeduju 90% ukupnogbogastva ove drzave.

We're at unprecedented levels of economic inequality.

To je novi ekonomske nejednakosti

bez presedana.

What that means is that wealth is not only becoming increasingly concentrated

To znaci da bogatstvo ne samoda sve vise postaje

koncentrisano u rukamamale grupe ljudi,

in the hands of a select group of individuals,

but the American dream is becoming increasingly unattainable

nego i da Americki san sve vise

postaje nedostizan

za vecinu nas.

for an increasing majority of us.

I ako je to slucaj, kao sto smo saznali,

And if it's the case, as we've been finding,

da sto ste bogatiji,

that the wealthier you are,

the more entitled you feel to that wealth,

vise osjecate pravo na to bogastvo,

vise stavljate vlastite interese

and the more likely you are to prioritize your own interests

ispred interesa drugih ljudi,

above the interests of other people,

and be willing to do things to serve that self-interest,

i voljni ste da cinite stvari kojesluze sopstvenom interesu,

well, then, there's no reason to think that those patterns will change.

onda nema razloga nemisliti

da ce sve postati samo jos gore,

In fact, there's every reason to think that they'll only get worse,

i evo kako bi izgledalo toako se nista ne promijeni,

and that's what it would look like if things just stayed the same,

u narednih 20 godina.

at the same linear rate, over the next 20 years.

Nejednakost, ekonomska nejednakost,

Now inequality -- economic inequality --

is something we should all be concerned about,

je nesto sto bi nas sve trebalo zabrinuti,

i ne samo zbog onih koji su na dnu

and not just because of those at the bottom of the social hierarchy,

drustvene ljestvice

but because individuals and groups

vec i zato sto osobe i grupe

sa puno ekonomske nejednakostiprolaze losije,

with lots of economic inequality do worse ...

not just the people at the bottom, everyone.

i to ne samo oni na dnu, nego svi.

Postoje mnoga hvale vrijedna istrazivanja

There's a lot of really compelling research

coming out from top labs all over the world,

najboljih centara sirom svijeta

showcasing the range of things that are undermined

koje pokazuju dijapazon stvari

koje se zanemaruju

as economic inequality gets worse.

sto je ekonomska nejednakost veca.

Social mobility, things we really care about,

Drustvena kretanja, stvari do kojihnam je stvarno stalo,

fizicko zdravlje, drustveno povjerenje,

physical health, social trust,

all go down as inequality goes up.

sve opada sto je nejednakost veca,

Similarly, negative things in social collectives and societies,

Slicno tome, negativne stvari

u drustvenim kolektivima i zajednicama,

poput pretilosti, nasilja,

things like obesity, and violence,

zatvora i kazni,

imprisonment, and punishment,

are exacerbated as economic inequality increases.

se pogorsavaju sa povecanjemekonomske nejednakosti.

Again, these are outcomes not just experienced by a few,

Ponavljam, ovo nisu zakljucci rezultata

samo iz pojedinih zajednica

but that resound across all strata of society.

vec iz svih slojeva drustva.

Even people at the top experience these outcomes.

Cak i ljudi na vrhu prolaze kroz isto.

Pa sta odna da cinimo?

So what do we do?

This cascade of self-perpetuating,

Ova kaskada samoodrzivih,

pernicious, negative effects

ubitacnih, negativnih efekata

could seem like something that's spun out of control,

bi se mogli ciniti kao nestosto se otelo kontroli,

and there's nothing we can do about it,

i da se nista tu visene moze uciniti,

certainly nothing we as individuals could do.

pogotovo niko ponaosob.

But in fact, we've been finding in our own laboratory research

Ali mi smo u nasem istrazivanju saznali

da male psiholoske intervencije,

that small psychological interventions,

male promjene u ljudskim vrijednostima,

small changes to people's values,

small nudges in certain directions,

mala gurkanja u odredenom pravcu,

can restore levels of egalitarianism and empathy.

mogu popraviti nivo egalitarizmai empatije.

For instance, reminding people of the benefits of cooperation

Na primjer, podsjecajuci ljude

beneficijama suradnje,

or the advantages of community,

cause wealthier individuals to be just as egalitarian

ili prednostima zajednice,

podstice imucne ljude da buduisto toliko egalitarni

as poor people.

kao i siromasni.

In one study, we had people watch a brief video, just 46 seconds long,

U jednoj studiji, dali smo ljudimada pogledaju kratak video,

oko 46 sekundi,o siromastvu djece

about childhood poverty

sto je posluzilo kao podsjetnikna potrebe drugih

that served as a reminder of the needs of others in the world around them.

u svijetu oko njih,

And after watching that,

a nakon videa smo posmatrali,

we looked at how willing people were to offer up their own time

koliko su ljudi bili voljni

da svoje vrijeme ponudenepoznatoj osobi

to a stranger presented to them in the lab, who was in distress.

koju su upoznali u laboratorijii koja je bila u nevolji.

After watching this video, an hour later,

Poslije gledanja videa,sat kasnije,

rich people became just as generous of their own time

bogatasi su postali jednako darezljivi

to help out this other person, a stranger,

sa svojim vremenom pomognuovu drugu osobu

as someone who's poor,

neznanca, kao i siromasni,

suggesting that these differences are not innate or categorical,

sto sugerise da ove razlike nisu

but are so malleable to slight changes in people's values,

urodene ili kategoricke,

vec osjetljive i na

and little nudges of compassion and bumps of empathy.

najmanje promjene u ljudskim vrijednostima,

na mala podsticanja na suosjecanje

And beyond the walls of our lab,

i izlive empatije.

we're even beginning to see signs of change in society.

A izvan zidova naseg laboratorija,

cak smo primjetili znakovepromjene u nasem drustvu.

Bill Gates, one of our nation's wealthiest individuals,

Bill Gates, jedan od najbogatijihosoba u nasoj drzavi,

in his Harvard commencement speech,

u svom pocetnom govoru na Hrvardu,

talked about the problem of inequality facing society

pricao je o problemu koje ceka drustvo

as being the most daunting challenge,

o nejednakosti kao o pocetnom izazovu,

and talked about what must be done to combat it,

kako se boriti protiv toga,

saying, "Humanity's greatest advances are not in its discoveries --

rekavsi, "Najveci podvizi covjecanstva

nisu nasa otkrica,

but in how those discoveries are applied

vec kako su ta otkrica iskoristena

to reduce inequity."

za smanjenje nejednakosti."

And there's the Giving Pledge,

A tu je i "Zavjet Darivanja",

in which more than 100 of our nation's wealthiest individuals

u kojem vese od 100 nabogatijih

ljudi nase nacije

are pledging half of their fortunes to charity.

zavjetuju pola svoga bogastvadobrotvornim ustanovama.

And there's the emergence of dozens of grassroots movements,

A to je i pojava

na desetine provincijalnih pokreta,

poput "Mi smo jedan procenat",

like "We are the 1 percent,"

"Resource Generation,"

"Generacija Resursa"

or "Wealth for Common Good,"

"Bogastvo za Zajednicko Dobro",

in which the most privileged members of the population,

u kojima najprivilegovaniji

clanovi nase populacije

members of the one percent and elsewhere,

clanovi tog jednog procenta i drugih,

people who are wealthy,

u kojima najprivilegovaniji

are using their own economic resources,

dijelovi populacije

clanovi toga jednog procenta i drugih organizacija,

adults and youth alike -- that's what's most striking to me --

leveraging their own privilege, their own economic resources,

ljudi koji su imucni,

svoje vlastite ekonomske resurse,

to combat inequality

i stari i madisto me je najvise iznenadilo

by advocating for social policies,

poravnavanjem svojih privilegija,

changes in social values

svojih ekonomskih resursa,

and changes in people's behavior

bore se protiv nejednakosti

that work against their own economic interests,

zagovaranjem socijalne politike

but that may ultimately restore the American dream.

promjene u drustvenim vrijednostima,

Thank you.

i promjene u ljudskom ponasanju,

(Applause)

koje rade protiv njihovih ekonomskih interesa

ali koji ce mozda na kraju vratitisjaj Americkog sna.

Hvala.

(Aplauz)