Why Brexit happened -- and what to do next | Alexander Betts

Prevoditelj: Marijana Vrankić Recezent: Ivan Stamenković

I am British.

Ja sam Britanac.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

Never before has the phrase "I am British" elicited so much pity.

Nikad prije fraza "Ja sam Britanac" nije izvlačila toliko sažaljenja.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

I come from an island where many of us like to believe

Dolazim s otoka na kojemu mnogi od nas vole vjerovati

there's been a lot of continuity over the last thousand years.

da postoji kontinuitet u posljednjih nekoliko tisuća godina.

We tend to have historically imposed change on others

U povijesti smo nametali promjene drugima,

but done much less of it ourselves.

ali malo smo ih učinili za sebe.

So it came as an immense shock to me

Zbog toga sam doživio golem šok

when I woke up on the morning of June 24

kad sam se probudio 24. lipnja

to discover that my country had voted to leave the European Union,

i otkrio da je moja zemlja izglasala izlazak iz Europske unije,

my Prime Minister had resigned,

premijer je dao ostavku,

and Scotland was considering a referendum

a Škotska je razmišljala o referendumu

that could bring to an end the very existence of the United Kingdom.

koji bi mogao dovesti do samog kraja postojanja Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva.

So that was an immense shock for me,

Dakle, to je bio veliki šok za mene

and it was an immense shock for many people,

i veliki šok za mnoge ljude,

but it was also something that, over the following several days,

ali i ono što je, u proteklih nekoliko dana,

created a complete political meltdown

stvorilo potpuno političko stapanje

in my country.

u mojoj zemlji.

There were calls for a second referendum,

Javila se želja za drugim referendumom,

almost as if, following a sports match,

kao da pratimo sportsku utakmicu i možemo

we could ask the opposition for a replay.

protivničku ekipu zamoliti za ponovno odigravanje.

Everybody was blaming everybody else.

Svi su krivili svakoga.

People blamed the Prime Minister

Ljudi su krivili premijera

for calling the referendum in the first place.

za pozivanje na referendum.

They blamed the leader of the opposition for not fighting it hard enough.

Krivili su predvodnika opozicije jer se nije dovoljno usprotivio.

The young accused the old.

Mladi su optuživali stare.

The educated blamed the less well-educated.

Obrazovani su okrivljavali manje obrazovane.

That complete meltdown was made even worse

To potpuno stapanje sve je učinilo još gorim

by the most tragic element of it:

najtragičnijim elementom:

levels of xenophobia and racist abuse in the streets of Britain

nivo ksenofobije i rasističkog zlostavljanja na ulicama Britanije

at a level that I have never seen before

koji nikad prije nisam doživio

in my lifetime.

u svom životu.

People are now talking about whether my country is becoming a Little England,

Ljudi razgovaraju o tome hoće li moja zemlja postati Little England

or, as one of my colleagues put it,

ili, kako je to sročio jedan od mojih kolega,

whether we're about to become a 1950s nostalgia theme park

hoćemo li postati nostalgični tematski park iz 1950-ih

floating in the Atlantic Ocean.

koji pluta u Atlantskom oceanu.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

But my question is really,

No moje je pravo pitanje

should we have the degree of shock that we've experienced since?

je li stupanj šoka koji smo iskusili zapravo opravdan?

Was it something that took place overnight?

Je li ovo nešto što se dogodilo preko noći?

Or are there deeper structural factors that have led us to where we are today?

Ili su nas dublji strukturalni faktori doveli do ovoga gdje smo danas?

So I want to take a step back and ask two very basic questions.

Zato se želim vratiti jedan korak unazad i zapitati se 2 ključna pitanja.

First, what does Brexit represent,

Prvo, što Brexit predstavlja,

not just for my country,

ne samo za moju zemlju,

but for all of us around the world?

već za sve nas u svijetu?

And second, what can we do about it?

I drugo, što možemo učiniti?

How should we all respond?

Kako bismo svi trebali odgovoriti?

So first, what does Brexit represent?

Dakle, prvo. Što Brexit predstavlja?

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Prekasno uviđanje predivna je stvar.

Brexit teaches us many things about our society

Brexit nas uči mnogim stvarima o našem društvu

and about societies around the world.

i o društvima u svijetu.

It highlights in ways that we seem embarrassingly unaware of

Na neobične načine naglašava, ono čega smo sramotno nesvjesni,

how divided our societies are.

koliko su podijeljena naša društva.

The vote split along lines of age, education, class and geography.

Podjela po glasovanju duž godina, obrazovanja, klase i geografije.

Young people didn't turn out to vote in great numbers,

Mladi nisu glasali u velikim brojevima,

but those that did wanted to remain.

ali oni koji jesu, htjeli su ostati.

Older people really wanted to leave the European Union.

Stariji su ljudi zbilja htjeli napustiti Europsku uniju.

Geographically, it was London and Scotland that most strongly committed

Geografski, London i Škotska najstrože su se obvezali

to being part of the European Union,

ostati dijelom Europske unije,

while in other parts of the country there was very strong ambivalence.

dok je u ostalim dijelovima zemlje postojala snažna ambivalencija.

Those divisions are things we really need to recognize and take seriously.

Takve podjele ono su što moramo prepoznati i shvatiti ozbiljno.

But more profoundly, the vote teaches us something

I još dublje, glasanje nas poučava

about the nature of politics today.

o prirodi politike u današnjici.

Contemporary politics is no longer just about right and left.

Suvremena politika nije više o podjeli na ljevicu i desnicu.

It's no longer just about tax and spend.

Nije više o porezima i troškovima.

It's about globalization.

Već o globalizaciji.

The fault line of contemporary politics is between those that embrace globalization

Linija kvara u suvremenoj politici je između onih koji zagovaraju globalizaciju

and those that fear globalization.

i onih koji se globalizacije boje.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

If we look at why those who wanted to leave --

Ako pogledamo zašto oni koji su htjeli otići --

we call them "Leavers," as opposed to "Remainers" --

zovemo ih "odlazitelji", nasuprot onih koji žele ostati --

we see two factors in the opinion polls

vidimo dva faktora u istraživanju javnog mnijenja

that really mattered.

koji su uistinu značajni.

The first was immigration, and the second sovereignty,

Prvi je imigracija, a drugi suverenost,

and these represent a desire for people to take back control of their own lives

oni predstavljaju želju ljudi da vrate kontrolu nad svojim životima

and the feeling that they are unrepresented by politicians.

i osjećaj da ih političari ne predstavljaju uistinu.

But those ideas are ones that signify fear and alienation.

Te ideje predstavljaju strah i otuđenje.

They represent a retreat back towards nationalism and borders

Predstavljaju povlačenje prema nacionalizmu i granicama

in ways that many of us would reject.

na način koji mnogi od nas odbijaju.

What I want to suggest is the picture is more complicated than that,

Ono što želim predložiti jest puno kompliciranija slika,

that liberal internationalists,

kako liberalni internacionalisti

like myself, and I firmly include myself in that picture,

poput mene, a čvrsto se ubrajam u tu sliku,

need to write ourselves back into the picture

moraju sebe ponovno staviti u sliku

in order to understand how we've got to where we are today.

kako bismo razumjeli kako smo stigli tu gdje jesmo danas.

When we look at the voting patterns across the United Kingdom,

Kada pogledamo uzorke glasača diljem Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva,

we can visibly see the divisions.

lako uočavamo podjele.

The blue areas show Remain

Plava područja označavaju ostanak,

and the red areas Leave.

a crvena izlazak.

When I looked at this,

Kad sam ovo pogledao,

what personally struck me was the very little time in my life

ono što me osobno pogodilo jest mala količina vremena u životu

I've actually spent in many of the red areas.

koju sam zbilja proveo u crvenim područjima.

I suddenly realized that, looking at the top 50 areas in the UK

Iznenada sam shvatio, gledajući top 50 područja u UK

that have the strongest Leave vote,

koja imaju najviše glasova za izlazak,

I've spent a combined total of four days of my life in those areas.

ukupno sam proveo 4 dana svog života u tim područjima.

In some of those places,

U nekim tim mjestima

I didn't even know the names of the voting districts.

nisam čak znao ni imena glasačkih okruga.

It was a real shock to me,

Bio je to pravi šok za mene,

and it suggested that people like me

a značilo je da ljudi poput mene

who think of ourselves as inclusive, open and tolerant,

koji se smatraju inkluzivnima, otvorenima i tolerantnima,

perhaps don't know our own countries and societies

možda ni ne poznaju vlastitu zemlju i društvo

nearly as well as we like to believe.

onoliko koliko volimo vjerovati da je tako.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

And the challenge that comes from that is we need to find a new way

Izazov koji nam se javlja jest u pronalasku novog načina

to narrate globalization to those people,

prenošenja globalizacije tim ljudima,

to recognize that for those people who have not necessarily been to university,

prepoznavanju da ti ljudi koji nisu nužno pohađali sveučilište,

who haven't necessarily grown up with the Internet,

koji nisu nužno odrasli uz internet,

that don't get opportunities to travel,

koji nemaju mnogo prilika za putovanja,

they may be unpersuaded by the narrative that we find persuasive

njih možda nije uvjerilo ono što mi smatramo uvjerljivim

in our often liberal bubbles.

u našim često liberalnim mjehurićima.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

It means that we need to reach out more broadly and understand.

To samo znači da moramo dohvatiti šire područje i razumjeti.

In the Leave vote, a minority have peddled the politics of fear and hatred,

U glasovima za izlazak, manjina je prčkala s politikom straha i mržnje

creating lies and mistrust

stvarajući laži i nepovjerenje

around, for instance, the idea that the vote on Europe

poput ideje da bi glas za Europu

could reduce the number of refugees and asylum-seekers coming to Europe,

mogao smanjiti broj izbjeglica i tražitelja skloništa u Europi

when the vote on leaving had nothing to do with immigration

dok glas za izlazak nije imao ništa sa samom imigracijom

from outside the European Union.

izvan Europske unije.

But for a significant majority of the Leave voters

No, za značajnu većinu glasača za izlazak iz EU

the concern was disillusionment with the political establishment.

najveća je briga bilo razočaranje političkog kadra.

This was a protest vote for many,

To je bio glas protesta za mnoge,

a sense that nobody represented them,

osjećaj da ih nitko ne predstavlja,

that they couldn't find a political party that spoke for them,

da ne mogu pronaći političku stranku koja će govoriti u njihovo ime,

and so they rejected that political establishment.

zbog toga su i odbili taj politički kadar.

This replicates around Europe and much of the liberal democratic world.

Ovo se javlja diljem Europe, pa i u liberalnom demokratskom svijetu.

We see it with the rise in popularity of Donald Trump in the United States,

Vidimo to u rastu popularnosti Donalda Trumpa u SAD-u,

with the growing nationalism of Viktor Orbán in Hungary,

u rastućem nacionalizmu Viktora Orbána u Mađarskoj,

with the increase in popularity of Marine Le Pen in France.

u porastu popularnosti Marine Le Pen u Francuskoj.

The specter of Brexit is in all of our societies.

Spektar Brexita je u svim našim društvima.

So the question I think we need to ask is my second question,

Pitanje koje moramo postaviti je sljedeće,

which is how should we collectively respond?

kako kolektivno odgovoriti na to?

For all of us who care about creating liberal, open, tolerant societies,

Za sve nas koji želimo stvoriti liberalna, otvorena i tolerantna društva,

we urgently need a new vision,

hitno trebamo novu viziju,

a vision of a more tolerant, inclusive globalization,

viziju tolerantnije i inkluzivnije globalizacije

one that brings people with us rather than leaving them behind.

koja zbližava ljude s nama, umjesto da ih ostavlja.

That vision of globalization

Takva vizija globalizacije

is one that has to start by a recognition of the positive benefits of globalization.

je ona koja mora započeti prepoznavanjem pozitivnih značajki globalizacije.

The consensus amongst economists

Dogovor između ekonomista

is that free trade, the movement of capital,

jest da slobodna razmjena, kretanje kapitala,

the movement of people across borders

kretanje ljudi preko granica,

benefit everyone on aggregate.

doprinosi svima.

The consensus amongst international relations scholars

Slaganje međunarodnih stipendista

is that globalization brings interdependence,

jest da globalizacija donosi međuovisnost

which brings cooperation and peace.

koja dovodi do suradnje i mira.

But globalization also has redistributive effects.

Ali globalizacija ima i redistributivne efekte.

It creates winners and losers.

Stvara pobjednike i gubitnike.

To take the example of migration,

Na primjeru migracije,

we know that immigration is a net positive for the economy as a whole

znamo da je imigracija neto pozitivna za ekonomiju u cjelinu

under almost all circumstances.

u skoro svim okolnostima.

But we also have to be very aware

Ali također moramo biti svjesni

that there are redistributive consequences,

da postoje redistributivne posljedice,

that importantly, low-skilled immigration

da najvažnije, loše izvedena imigracija

can lead to a reduction in wages for the most impoverished in our societies

može dovesti do smanjenja plaća za najviše osiromašene u našem društvu

and also put pressure on house prices.

te dovesti do pritiska na cijenama kuća.

That doesn't detract from the fact that it's positive,

To ne umanjuje činjenicu da je ona pozitivna,

but it means more people have to share in those benefits

ali znači da više ljudi mora dijeliti koristi

and recognize them.

te ih ujedno prepoznavati.

In 2002, the former Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan,

U 2002. godini, prijašnji glavni tajnik Ujedinjenih Naroda, Kofi Annan,

gave a speech at Yale University,

održao je govor na Sveučilištu Yale

and that speech was on the topic of inclusive globalization.

i taj je govor bio o inkluzivnoj globalizaciji.

That was the speech in which he coined that term.

U tom je govoru i skovao taj termin.

And he said, and I paraphrase,

Rekao je, parafraziram,

"The glass house of globalization has to be open to all

"Staklena kuća globalizacije mora biti otvorena za sve

if it is to remain secure.

ako želi ostati sigurna.

Bigotry and ignorance

Netrpeljivost i neznanje

are the ugly face of exclusionary and antagonistic globalization."

ružno su lice ekskluzivne i antagonističke globalizacije."

That idea of inclusive globalization was briefly revived in 2008

Ideja inkluzivne globalizacije sažeto je revidirana 2008. godine

in a conference on progressive governance

na konferenciji o naprednoj vladavini

involving many of the leaders of European countries.

uključujući mnoge čelnike europskih zemalja.

But amid austerity and the financial crisis of 2008,

Međutim, zbog štednje i financijske krize u 2008. g.

the concept disappeared almost without a trace.

cijeli je koncept nestao gotovo bez traga.

Globalization has been taken to support a neoliberal agenda.

Globalizacija sada podržava neoliberalni dnevni red.

It's perceived to be part of an elite agenda

Percipira se kao dio elitnoga,

rather than something that benefits all.

a ne kao nešto što doprinosi svima.

And it needs to be reclaimed on a far more inclusive basis

Potrebno ju je povratiti na puno inkluzivnijoj osnovi

than it is today.

od one na kojoj je danas.

So the question is, how can we achieve that goal?

Dakle, pitanje je kako možemo postići taj cilj.

How can we balance on the one hand addressing fear and alienation

Kako možemo uravnotežiti s jedne strane strah i otuđenje,

while on the other hand refusing vehemently

a s druge ljuto odbijanje

to give in to xenophobia and nationalism?

ksenofobije i nacionalizma?

That is the question for all of us.

To je pitanje za sve nas.

And I think, as a social scientist,

A ja, kao sociolog, mislim

that social science offers some places to start.

da je sociologija mjesto za dobar početak.

Our transformation has to be about both ideas and about material change,

Naša promjena mora obuhvatiti ideje, ali i materijalne promjene,

and I want to give you four ideas as a starting point.

a želim vam dati 4 ideje kao početnu točku.

The first relates to the idea of civic education.

Prva je vezana za ideju građanskog obrazovanja.

What stands out from Brexit

Ono što nastaje od Brexita

is the gap between public perception and empirical reality.

jest praznina između javnog mnijenja i empirijske stvarnosti.

It's been suggested that we've moved to a postfactual society,

Spominje se da smo napredovali do posliječinjeničnog društva,

where evidence and truth no longer matter,

gdje iznenada dokazi i istina nisu važni,

and lies have equal status to the clarity of evidence.

a laži imaju jednak status kao i jasnoća dokaza.

So how can we --

Dakle, kako možemo --

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

How can we rebuild respect for truth and evidence into our liberal democracies?

Kako možemo izgraditi poštivanje istine i dokaza u liberalnoj demokraciji?

It has to begin with education,

Moramo započeti s obrazovanjem,

but it has to start with the recognition that there are huge gaps.

s prepoznavanjem da postoje velike praznine.

In 2014, the pollster Ipsos MORI

U 2014. pollster Ipsos MORI

published a survey on attitudes to immigration,

objavio je pregled mišljenja o imigraciji

and it showed that as numbers of immigrants increase,

te pokazao da s rastućim brojem imigranata

so public concern with immigration also increases,

raste i interes javnosti za imigraciju,

although it obviously didn't unpack causality,

iako to očito ne dokazuje uzročnost,

because this could equally be to do not so much with numbers

jer ovo nema toliko veze sa samim brojevima,

but the political and media narrative around it.

već s političkom i medijskom pričom.

But the same survey also revealed

Međutim, isti je pregled otkrio

huge public misinformation

veliko dezinformiranje javnosti

and misunderstanding about the nature of immigration.

i nerazumijevanje prirode imigracije.

For example, in these attitudes in the United Kingdom,

Na primjer, u Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu,

the public believed that levels of asylum

javnost je vjerovala da je broj utočišta

were a greater proportion of immigration than they were,

veći od broja imigranata,

but they also believed the levels of educational migration

a vjerovali su i da je broj migracija povezanih s obrazovanjem

were far lower as a proportion of overall migration

puno niži u cjelokupnoj migraciji

than they actually are.

nego što je to uistinu.

So we have to address this misinformation,

Dakle, moramo otkriti dezinformacije,

the gap between perception and reality on key aspects of globalization.

prazninu između percepcije i stvarnosti kao ključni aspekt globalizacije.

And that can't just be something that's left to our schools,

I to ne može biti nešto što će se odnositi samo na škole,

although that's important to begin at an early age.

iako je važno započeti s tim u ranoj dobi.

It has to be about lifelong civic participation

Naglasak treba biti na životnom građanskom sudjelovanju

and public engagement that we all encourage as societies.

i javnom uključivanju koje svi potičemo u našem društvu.

The second thing that I think is an opportunity

Sljedeća stvar za koju vjerujem da je prilika za nas

is the idea to encourage more interaction across diverse communities.

jest ideja ohrabrivanja interakcije između raznih zajednica.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

One of the things that stands out for me very strikingly,

Jedna od stvari koja je veoma upadljiva,

looking at immigration attitudes in the United Kingdom,

promatrajući stvavove o imigraciji u Ujedinjenom Kraljevstvu,

is that ironically, the regions of my country

jest, ironično, da regije u mojoj zemlji

that are the most tolerant of immigrants

koje su najtolerantnije prema imigrantima

have the highest numbers of immigrants.

imaju najveći broj imigranata.

So for instance, London and the Southeast have the highest numbers of immigrants,

Na primjer, London i Jugoistok imaju najveći broj imigranata,

and they are also by far the most tolerant areas.

a ujedno su i najtolerantnija područja.

It's those areas of the country that have the lowest levels of immigration

Ona područja u zemlji koja imaju najniže nivoe imigracije

that actually are the most exclusionary and intolerant towards migrants.

zapravo su najviše isključujuća i netolerantna prema migrantima.

So we need to encourage exchange programs.

Dakle, treba poticati programe razmjene.

We need to ensure that older generations who maybe can't travel

Potrebno je starijim generacijama koje možda ne mogu putovati

get access to the Internet.

osigurati pristup internetu.

We need to encourage, even on a local and national level,

Potrebno je osigurati, barem na lokalnom i nacionalnom nivou,

more movement, more participation,

više kretanja, više uključivanja,

more interaction with people who we don't know

više interakcije s ljudima koje ne poznajemo

and whose views we might not necessarily agree with.

i s čijim se pogledima možda nećemo nužno slagati.

The third thing that I think is crucial, though,

Treća je stvar presudna,

and this is really fundamental,

i najtemeljitija,

is we have to ensure that everybody shares

potrebno je osigurati svima mogućnost da dijele

in the benefits of globalization.

koristi globalizacije.

This illustration from the Financial Times post-Brexit is really striking.

Ilustracije iz Financial Timesa o post-Brexitu su veoma upadljive.

It shows tragically that those people who voted to leave the European Union

Pokazuju da su oni koji su glasali za izlazak iz EU, tragično

were those who actually benefited the most materially

oni koji su najviše profitirali materijalno

from trade with the European Union.

iz razmjene s Europskom unijom.

But the problem is that those people in those areas

Problem je u tome što ljudi u tim područjima

didn't perceive themselves to be beneficiaries.

sebe ne percipiraju kao one koji imaju koristi.

They didn't believe that they were actually getting access

Nisu vjerovali da su imali pristup

to material benefits of increased trade and increased mobility around the world.

materijalnoj koristi i povećanoj razmjeni te povećanoj mobilnosti diljem svijeta.

I work on questions predominantly to do with refugees,

Uglavnom se bavim pitanjima vezanim uz izbjeglice

and one of the ideas I spent a lot of my time preaching,

i jedna od ideja o kojoj sam mnogo govorio,

mainly to developing countries around the world,

uglavnom diljem svijeta u zemljama u razvoju,

is that in order to encourage the integration of refugees,

jest da, kako bismo ohrabrili integraciju izbjeglica,

we can't just benefit the refugee populations,

ne možemo doprinositi samo populaciji izbjeglica,

we also have to address the concerns of the host communities in local areas.

već imati na umu i brige domaćih zajednica u lokalnim područjima.

But in looking at that,

Gledajući na to,

one of the policy prescriptions is that we have to provide

jedan od političkih recepata jest osigurati

disproportionately better education facilities, health facilities,

disproporcionalno bolje obrazovne ustanove, zdravstvene ustanove,

access to social services

pristup socijalnim službama,

in those regions of high immigration

u regijama imigracije

to address the concerns of those local populations.

kako bismo imenovali probleme lokalne populacije.

But while we encourage that around the developing world,

Međutim, dok to potičemo u razvijenim zemljama,

we don't take those lessons home

ne preuzimamo te lekcije doma

and incorporate them in our own societies.

i ne uključujemo ih u svoje društvo.

Furthermore, if we're going to really take seriously

Nadalje, ako ćemo uzeti za ozbiljno

the need to ensure people share in the economic benefits,

potrebu osiguravanja ljudima dijeljenje ekonomskih dobara,

our businesses and corporations need a model of globalization

naše tvrtke i korporacije trebaju model globalizacije

that recognizes that they, too, have to take people with them.

koji prepoznaje da i oni moraju uključiti ljude.

The fourth and final idea I want to put forward

Četvrta i posljednja ideja koju želim istaknuti

is an idea that we need more responsible politics.

jest ideja da nam je potrebna odgovorna politika.

There's very little social science evidence

Malo je socioloških dokaza

that compares attitudes on globalization.

koji uspoređuju stavove o globalizaciji.

But from the surveys that do exist,

Ali iz istraživanja koja postoje,

what we can see is there's huge variation across different countries

možemo uočiti veliku razliku između različitih zemalja

and time periods in those countries

i vremenskih perioda u tim zemljama

for attitudes and tolerance

za stavove i toleranciju

of questions like migration and mobility on the one hand

o pitanju migracije i mobilnosti s jedne strane

and free trade on the other.

te slobodne razmjene s druge.

But one hypothesis that I think emerges from a cursory look at that data

Ali jedna hipoteza koja proizlazi iz pogleda na te podatke

is the idea that polarized societies are far less tolerant of globalization.

jest ideja da su polarizirana društva manje tolerantna prema globalizaciji.

It's the societies like Sweden in the past,

Društva poput Švedske u prošlosti,

like Canada today,

poput Kanade danas,

where there is a centrist politics,

u kojima postoji centralistička politika,

where right and left work together,

u kojima desnica i ljevica surađuju,

that we encourage supportive attitudes towards globalization.

potiču se i stavovi potpore prema globalizaciji.

And what we see around the world today is a tragic polarization,

Ono što danas vidimo diljem svijeta jest tragična polarizacija,

a failure to have dialogue between the extremes in politics,

neuspjeh u uspostavljanju dijaloga između ekstrema u politici,

and a gap in terms of that liberal center ground

i praznina u pojmovima liberalnog centra

that can encourage communication and a shared understanding.

koji može potaknuti komunikaciju i međusobno razumijevanje.

We might not achieve that today,

Možda to nećemo postići danas,

but at the very least we have to call upon our politicians and our media

međutim, moramo pozvati sve političare i medije

to drop a language of fear and be far more tolerant of one another.

da otpuste jezik straha i budu tolerantniji jedni prema drugima.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)

These ideas are very tentative,

Ove su ideje privremene,

and that's in part because this needs to be an inclusive and shared project.

zato što ovo dijelom mora biti inkluzivni projekt.

I am still British.

Još sam uvijek Britanac.

I am still European.

Još sam uvijek Europljanin.

I am still a global citizen.

Još sam uvijek globalni građanin.

For those of us who believe

Za one od nas koji vjeruju

that our identities are not mutually exclusive,

da naši identiteti nisu međusobno isključivi,

we have to all work together

moramo raditi svi zajedno

to ensure that globalization takes everyone with us

da bismo osigurali da nas globalizacije sve povede

and doesn't leave people behind.

i ne ostavi nikoga od nas.

Only then will we truly reconcile democracy and globalization.

Samo ćemo tada moći pomiriti demokraciju i globalizaciju.

Thank you.

Hvala vam.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)