Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate

540,692 views ・ 2010-06-08

TED


Please double-click on the English subtitles below to play the video.

00:17
One thing the world needs,
0
17260
2000
00:19
one thing this country desperately needs
1
19260
2000
00:21
is a better way
2
21260
2000
00:23
of conducting our political debates.
3
23260
2000
00:25
We need to rediscover
4
25260
2000
00:27
the lost art of democratic argument.
5
27260
3000
00:30
(Applause)
6
30260
6000
00:36
If you think about the arguments we have,
7
36260
3000
00:39
most of the time it's shouting matches
8
39260
2000
00:41
on cable television,
9
41260
2000
00:43
ideological food fights on the floor of Congress.
10
43260
3000
00:48
I have a suggestion.
11
48260
2000
00:50
Look at all the arguments we have these days
12
50260
3000
00:53
over health care,
13
53260
2000
00:55
over bonuses and bailouts on Wall Street,
14
55260
3000
00:58
over the gap between rich and poor,
15
58260
3000
01:01
over affirmative action and same-sex marriage.
16
61260
3000
01:04
Lying just beneath the surface
17
64260
2000
01:06
of those arguments,
18
66260
3000
01:09
with passions raging on all sides,
19
69260
3000
01:12
are big questions
20
72260
3000
01:15
of moral philosophy,
21
75260
2000
01:17
big questions of justice.
22
77260
2000
01:19
But we too rarely
23
79260
2000
01:21
articulate and defend
24
81260
3000
01:24
and argue about
25
84260
2000
01:26
those big moral questions in our politics.
26
86260
3000
01:29
So what I would like to do today
27
89260
3000
01:32
is have something of a discussion.
28
92260
2000
01:34
First, let me take
29
94260
2000
01:36
a famous philosopher
30
96260
2000
01:38
who wrote about those questions
31
98260
2000
01:40
of justice and morality,
32
100260
2000
01:42
give you a very short lecture
33
102260
2000
01:44
on Aristotle of ancient Athens,
34
104260
3000
01:47
Aristotle's theory of justice,
35
107260
2000
01:49
and then have a discussion here
36
109260
3000
01:52
to see whether Aristotle's ideas
37
112260
2000
01:54
actually inform
38
114260
2000
01:56
the way we think and argue
39
116260
2000
01:58
about questions today.
40
118260
3000
02:01
So, are you ready for the lecture?
41
121260
3000
02:05
According to Aristotle,
42
125260
2000
02:07
justice means giving people what they deserve.
43
127260
3000
02:13
That's it; that's the lecture.
44
133260
2000
02:15
(Laughter)
45
135260
3000
02:18
Now, you may say, well, that's obvious enough.
46
138260
2000
02:20
The real questions begin
47
140260
2000
02:22
when it comes to arguing about
48
142260
2000
02:24
who deserves what and why.
49
144260
3000
02:28
Take the example of flutes.
50
148260
2000
02:30
Suppose we're distributing flutes.
51
150260
3000
02:33
Who should get the best ones?
52
153260
2000
02:35
Let's see what people --
53
155260
2000
02:37
What would you say?
54
157260
2000
02:39
Who should get the best flute?
55
159260
2000
02:41
You can just call it out.
56
161260
2000
02:43
(Audience: Random.)
57
163260
2000
02:45
Michael Sandel: At random. You would do it by lottery.
58
165260
2000
02:47
Or by the first person to rush into the hall to get them.
59
167260
3000
02:51
Who else?
60
171260
2000
02:53
(Audience: The best flute players.)
61
173260
2000
02:55
MS: The best flute players. (Audience: The worst flute players.)
62
175260
2000
02:57
MS: The worst flute players.
63
177260
3000
03:00
How many say the best flute players?
64
180260
2000
03:04
Why?
65
184260
2000
03:07
Actually, that was Aristotle's answer too.
66
187260
3000
03:10
(Laughter)
67
190260
2000
03:12
But here's a harder question.
68
192260
2000
03:14
Why do you think,
69
194260
2000
03:16
those of you who voted this way,
70
196260
2000
03:18
that the best flutes should go to the best flute players?
71
198260
3000
03:21
Peter: The greatest benefit to all.
72
201260
2000
03:23
MS: The greatest benefit to all.
73
203260
2000
03:25
We'll hear better music
74
205260
2000
03:27
if the best flutes should go to the best flute players.
75
207260
3000
03:30
That's Peter? (Audience: Peter.)
76
210260
2000
03:32
MS: All right.
77
212260
2000
03:35
Well, it's a good reason.
78
215260
2000
03:37
We'll all be better off if good music is played
79
217260
2000
03:39
rather than terrible music.
80
219260
3000
03:43
But Peter,
81
223260
2000
03:45
Aristotle doesn't agree with you that that's the reason.
82
225260
3000
03:48
That's all right.
83
228260
2000
03:50
Aristotle had a different reason
84
230260
2000
03:52
for saying the best flutes should go to the best flute players.
85
232260
3000
03:55
He said,
86
235260
2000
03:57
that's what flutes are for --
87
237260
2000
03:59
to be played well.
88
239260
3000
04:02
He says that to reason about
89
242260
2000
04:04
just distribution of a thing,
90
244260
3000
04:07
we have to reason about,
91
247260
3000
04:10
and sometimes argue about,
92
250260
2000
04:12
the purpose of the thing,
93
252260
2000
04:14
or the social activity --
94
254260
2000
04:16
in this case, musical performance.
95
256260
2000
04:18
And the point, the essential nature,
96
258260
2000
04:20
of musical performance
97
260260
2000
04:22
is to produce excellent music.
98
262260
2000
04:24
It'll be a happy byproduct
99
264260
2000
04:26
that we'll all benefit.
100
266260
3000
04:30
But when we think about justice,
101
270260
3000
04:33
Aristotle says,
102
273260
2000
04:35
what we really need to think about
103
275260
2000
04:37
is the essential nature of the activity in question
104
277260
3000
04:41
and the qualities that are worth
105
281260
3000
04:44
honoring and admiring and recognizing.
106
284260
3000
04:47
One of the reasons
107
287260
2000
04:49
that the best flute players should get the best flutes
108
289260
2000
04:51
is that musical performance
109
291260
2000
04:53
is not only to make the rest of us happy,
110
293260
2000
04:55
but to honor
111
295260
2000
04:57
and recognize
112
297260
2000
04:59
the excellence
113
299260
2000
05:01
of the best musicians.
114
301260
2000
05:03
Now, flutes may seem ... the distribution of flutes
115
303260
3000
05:06
may seem a trivial case.
116
306260
3000
05:09
Let's take a contemporary example
117
309260
2000
05:11
of the dispute about justice.
118
311260
3000
05:14
It had to do with golf.
119
314260
2000
05:16
Casey Martin -- a few years ago,
120
316260
2000
05:18
Casey Martin --
121
318260
2000
05:20
did any of you hear about him?
122
320260
2000
05:22
He was a very good golfer,
123
322260
2000
05:24
but he had a disability.
124
324260
2000
05:26
He had a bad leg, a circulatory problem,
125
326260
3000
05:29
that made it very painful
126
329260
2000
05:31
for him to walk the course.
127
331260
3000
05:34
In fact, it carried risk of injury.
128
334260
3000
05:38
He asked the PGA,
129
338260
2000
05:40
the Professional Golfers' Association,
130
340260
2000
05:42
for permission to use a golf cart
131
342260
3000
05:45
in the PGA tournaments.
132
345260
2000
05:47
They said, "No.
133
347260
2000
05:49
Now that would give you an unfair advantage."
134
349260
2000
05:51
He sued,
135
351260
2000
05:53
and his case went all the way
136
353260
2000
05:55
to the Supreme Court, believe it or not,
137
355260
2000
05:57
the case over the golf cart,
138
357260
3000
06:00
because the law says
139
360260
2000
06:02
that the disabled
140
362260
2000
06:04
must be accommodated,
141
364260
3000
06:07
provided the accommodation does not
142
367260
3000
06:10
change the essential nature
143
370260
3000
06:13
of the activity.
144
373260
2000
06:15
He says, "I'm a great golfer.
145
375260
2000
06:17
I want to compete.
146
377260
2000
06:19
But I need a golf cart
147
379260
2000
06:21
to get from one hole to the next."
148
381260
2000
06:23
Suppose you were
149
383260
2000
06:25
on the Supreme Court.
150
385260
2000
06:27
Suppose you were deciding
151
387260
2000
06:29
the justice of this case.
152
389260
3000
06:32
How many here would say
153
392260
2000
06:34
that Casey Martin does have a right to use a golf cart?
154
394260
3000
06:37
And how many say, no, he doesn't?
155
397260
3000
06:41
All right, let's take a poll, show of hands.
156
401260
2000
06:43
How many would rule in favor of Casey Martin?
157
403260
2000
06:47
And how many would not? How many would say he doesn't?
158
407260
3000
06:50
All right, we have a good division of opinion here.
159
410260
3000
06:54
Someone who would not
160
414260
2000
06:56
grant Casey Martin the right to a golf cart,
161
416260
2000
06:58
what would be your reason?
162
418260
2000
07:00
Raise your hand, and we'll try to get you a microphone.
163
420260
2000
07:02
What would be your reason?
164
422260
2000
07:05
(Audience: It'd be an unfair advantage.)
165
425260
2000
07:07
MS: It would be an unfair advantage
166
427260
3000
07:10
if he gets to ride in a golf cart.
167
430260
2000
07:12
All right, those of you,
168
432260
2000
07:14
I imagine most of you who would not give him the golf cart
169
434260
3000
07:17
worry about an unfair advantage.
170
437260
2000
07:19
What about those of you who say
171
439260
2000
07:21
he should be given a golf cart?
172
441260
2000
07:23
How would you answer the objection?
173
443260
2000
07:25
Yes, all right.
174
445260
2000
07:27
Audience: The cart's not part of the game.
175
447260
3000
07:30
MS: What's your name? (Audience: Charlie.)
176
450260
3000
07:33
MS: Charlie says --
177
453260
3000
07:36
We'll get Charlie a microphone in case someone wants to reply.
178
456260
2000
07:38
Tell us, Charlie,
179
458260
2000
07:40
why would you say he should be able to use a golf cart?
180
460260
3000
07:43
Charlie: The cart's not part of the game.
181
463260
3000
07:47
MS: But what about walking from hole to hole?
182
467260
3000
07:50
Charlie: It doesn't matter; it's not part of the game.
183
470260
3000
07:53
MS: Walking the course is not part of the game of golf?
184
473260
3000
07:57
Charlie: Not in my book, it isn't.
185
477260
2000
07:59
MS: All right. Stay there, Charlie.
186
479260
2000
08:01
(Laughter)
187
481260
2000
08:03
Who has an answer for Charlie?
188
483260
3000
08:06
All right, who has an answer for Charlie?
189
486260
2000
08:08
What would you say?
190
488260
2000
08:10
Audience: The endurance element is a very important part of the game,
191
490260
3000
08:13
walking all those holes.
192
493260
2000
08:15
MS: Walking all those holes?
193
495260
2000
08:17
That's part of the game of golf? (Audience: Absolutely.)
194
497260
3000
08:20
MS: What's your name? (Audience: Warren.)
195
500260
2000
08:22
MS: Warren.
196
502260
2000
08:25
Charlie, what do you say to Warren?
197
505260
2000
08:29
Charley: I'll stick to my original thesis.
198
509260
2000
08:31
(Laughter)
199
511260
6000
08:37
MS: Warren, are you a golfer?
200
517260
2000
08:39
Warren: I am not a golfer.
201
519260
2000
08:41
Charley: And I am. (MS: Okay.)
202
521260
2000
08:43
(Laughter)
203
523260
2000
08:45
(Applause)
204
525260
4000
08:49
You know,
205
529260
2000
08:51
it's interesting.
206
531260
2000
08:55
In the case, in the lower court,
207
535260
2000
08:57
they brought in golfing greats
208
537260
3000
09:00
to testify on this very issue.
209
540260
3000
09:04
Is walking the course essential to the game?
210
544260
3000
09:07
And they brought in Jack Nicklaus and Arnold Palmer.
211
547260
3000
09:10
And what do you suppose they all said?
212
550260
2000
09:12
Yes. They agreed with Warren.
213
552260
3000
09:15
They said, yes, walking the course
214
555260
2000
09:17
is strenuous physical exercise.
215
557260
2000
09:19
The fatigue factor is an important part of golf.
216
559260
3000
09:22
And so it would change
217
562260
2000
09:24
the fundamental nature of the game
218
564260
3000
09:27
to give him the golf cart.
219
567260
2000
09:29
Now, notice,
220
569260
2000
09:31
something interesting --
221
571260
2000
09:33
Well, I should tell you about the Supreme Court first.
222
573260
2000
09:35
The Supreme Court
223
575260
2000
09:37
decided.
224
577260
2000
09:39
What do you suppose they said?
225
579260
3000
09:42
They said yes,
226
582260
2000
09:44
that Casey Martin must be provided a golf cart.
227
584260
3000
09:47
Seven to two, they ruled.
228
587260
2000
09:50
What was interesting about their ruling
229
590260
3000
09:54
and about the discussion we've just had
230
594260
3000
09:58
is that the discussion about
231
598260
2000
10:00
the right, the justice, of the matter
232
600260
2000
10:02
depended on
233
602260
2000
10:04
figuring out what is
234
604260
3000
10:07
the essential nature of golf.
235
607260
3000
10:10
And the Supreme Court justices
236
610260
2000
10:12
wrestled with that question.
237
612260
2000
10:14
And Justice Stevens, writing for the majority,
238
614260
2000
10:16
said he had read all about the history of golf,
239
616260
3000
10:21
and the essential point of the game
240
621260
3000
10:24
is to get very small ball from one place
241
624260
2000
10:26
into a hole
242
626260
2000
10:28
in as few strokes as possible,
243
628260
3000
10:31
and that walking was not essential, but incidental.
244
631260
2000
10:33
Now, there were two dissenters,
245
633260
2000
10:35
one of whom was Justice Scalia.
246
635260
3000
10:40
He wouldn't have granted the cart,
247
640260
3000
10:43
and he had a very interesting dissent.
248
643260
2000
10:45
It's interesting because
249
645260
2000
10:47
he rejected the Aristotelian premise
250
647260
3000
10:50
underlying the majority's opinion.
251
650260
2000
10:52
He said it's not possible
252
652260
3000
10:55
to determine the essential nature
253
655260
3000
10:58
of a game like golf.
254
658260
2000
11:00
Here's how he put it.
255
660260
2000
11:02
"To say that something is essential
256
662260
2000
11:04
is ordinarily to say that it is necessary
257
664260
2000
11:06
to the achievement of a certain object.
258
666260
3000
11:09
But since it is the very nature of a game
259
669260
2000
11:11
to have no object except amusement,
260
671260
3000
11:15
(Laughter)
261
675260
4000
11:19
that is, what distinguishes games
262
679260
2000
11:21
from productive activity,
263
681260
2000
11:23
(Laughter)
264
683260
3000
11:26
it is quite impossible to say
265
686260
2000
11:28
that any of a game's arbitrary rules
266
688260
3000
11:31
is essential."
267
691260
2000
11:33
So there you have Justice Scalia
268
693260
2000
11:35
taking on the Aristotelian premise
269
695260
3000
11:38
of the majority's opinion.
270
698260
3000
11:41
Justice Scalia's opinion
271
701260
3000
11:44
is questionable
272
704260
2000
11:46
for two reasons.
273
706260
2000
11:48
First, no real sports fan would talk that way.
274
708260
3000
11:51
(Laughter)
275
711260
2000
11:53
If we had thought that the rules
276
713260
2000
11:55
of the sports we care about
277
715260
2000
11:57
are merely arbitrary,
278
717260
2000
11:59
rather than designed to call forth
279
719260
3000
12:02
the virtues and the excellences
280
722260
3000
12:05
that we think are worthy of admiring,
281
725260
2000
12:07
we wouldn't care about the outcome of the game.
282
727260
3000
12:10
It's also objectionable
283
730260
3000
12:13
on a second ground.
284
733260
2000
12:15
On the face of it,
285
735260
2000
12:17
it seemed to be -- this debate about the golf cart --
286
737260
3000
12:20
an argument about fairness,
287
740260
3000
12:23
what's an unfair advantage.
288
743260
3000
12:27
But if fairness were the only thing at stake,
289
747260
3000
12:30
there would have been an easy and obvious solution.
290
750260
3000
12:33
What would it be? (Audience: Let everyone use the cart.)
291
753260
2000
12:35
Let everyone ride in a golf cart
292
755260
3000
12:38
if they want to.
293
758260
2000
12:40
Then the fairness objection goes away.
294
760260
3000
12:43
But letting everyone ride in a cart
295
763260
3000
12:46
would have been, I suspect,
296
766260
2000
12:48
more anathema
297
768260
2000
12:50
to the golfing greats
298
770260
2000
12:52
and to the PGA,
299
772260
2000
12:54
even than making an exception for Casey Martin.
300
774260
2000
12:56
Why?
301
776260
2000
12:58
Because what was at stake
302
778260
2000
13:00
in the dispute over the golf cart
303
780260
3000
13:03
was not only the essential nature of golf,
304
783260
3000
13:06
but, relatedly, the question:
305
786260
3000
13:09
What abilities
306
789260
3000
13:12
are worthy
307
792260
2000
13:14
of honor and recognition
308
794260
2000
13:16
as athletic talents?
309
796260
3000
13:19
Let me put the point
310
799260
2000
13:21
as delicately as possible:
311
801260
3000
13:24
Golfers are a little sensitive
312
804260
2000
13:26
about the athletic status of their game.
313
806260
3000
13:29
(Laughter)
314
809260
5000
13:35
After all, there's no running or jumping,
315
815260
3000
13:38
and the ball stands still.
316
818260
3000
13:41
(Laughter)
317
821260
3000
13:44
So if golfing is the kind of game
318
824260
3000
13:47
that can be played while riding around in a golf cart,
319
827260
3000
13:50
it would be hard to confer
320
830260
3000
13:53
on the golfing greats
321
833260
2000
13:55
the status that we confer,
322
835260
2000
13:57
the honor and recognition
323
837260
2000
13:59
that goes to truly great athletes.
324
839260
3000
14:03
That illustrates
325
843260
3000
14:06
that with golf,
326
846260
3000
14:09
as with flutes,
327
849260
2000
14:11
it's hard to decide the question
328
851260
3000
14:14
of what justice requires,
329
854260
3000
14:17
without grappling with the question,
330
857260
2000
14:19
"What is the essential nature
331
859260
2000
14:21
of the activity in question,
332
861260
2000
14:23
and what qualities,
333
863260
3000
14:26
what excellences
334
866260
2000
14:28
connected with that activity,
335
868260
2000
14:30
are worthy of honor and recognition?"
336
870260
3000
14:34
Let's take a final example
337
874260
2000
14:36
that's prominent in contemporary political debate:
338
876260
3000
14:39
same-sex marriage.
339
879260
2000
14:43
There are those who favor state recognition
340
883260
3000
14:46
only of traditional marriage
341
886260
2000
14:48
between one man and one woman,
342
888260
3000
14:51
and there are those who favor state recognition
343
891260
2000
14:53
of same-sex marriage.
344
893260
2000
14:55
How many here
345
895260
2000
14:57
favor the first policy:
346
897260
2000
14:59
the state should recognize traditional marriage only?
347
899260
3000
15:04
And how many favor the second, same-sex marriage?
348
904260
3000
15:08
Now, put it this way:
349
908260
3000
15:11
What ways of thinking
350
911260
2000
15:13
about justice and morality
351
913260
2000
15:15
underlie the arguments we have
352
915260
2000
15:17
over marriage?
353
917260
2000
15:19
The opponents of same-sex marriage say
354
919260
3000
15:22
that the purpose of marriage,
355
922260
2000
15:24
fundamentally, is procreation,
356
924260
2000
15:26
and that's what's worthy of honoring
357
926260
2000
15:28
and recognizing and encouraging.
358
928260
3000
15:31
And the defenders of same-sex marriage say no,
359
931260
3000
15:34
procreation is not the only purpose of marriage;
360
934260
3000
15:38
what about a lifelong, mutual, loving commitment?
361
938260
3000
15:41
That's really what marriage is about.
362
941260
3000
15:45
So with flutes, with golf carts,
363
945260
3000
15:48
and even with a fiercely contested question
364
948260
3000
15:51
like same-sex marriage,
365
951260
3000
15:54
Aristotle has a point.
366
954260
3000
15:57
Very hard to argue about justice
367
957260
2000
15:59
without first arguing
368
959260
3000
16:02
about the purpose of social institutions
369
962260
3000
16:05
and about what qualities are worthy
370
965260
2000
16:07
of honor and recognition.
371
967260
3000
16:10
So let's step back from these cases
372
970260
3000
16:13
and see how they shed light
373
973260
3000
16:16
on the way we might improve, elevate,
374
976260
3000
16:19
the terms of political discourse
375
979260
3000
16:22
in the United States,
376
982260
2000
16:24
and for that matter, around the world.
377
984260
3000
16:27
There is a tendency to think
378
987260
2000
16:29
that if we engage too directly
379
989260
3000
16:32
with moral questions in politics,
380
992260
2000
16:34
that's a recipe for disagreement,
381
994260
2000
16:36
and for that matter, a recipe for
382
996260
2000
16:38
intolerance and coercion.
383
998260
2000
16:40
So better to shy away from,
384
1000260
2000
16:42
to ignore,
385
1002260
2000
16:44
the moral and the religious convictions
386
1004260
2000
16:46
that people bring to civic life.
387
1006260
2000
16:48
It seems to me that our discussion
388
1008260
3000
16:51
reflects the opposite,
389
1011260
2000
16:53
that a better way
390
1013260
3000
16:56
to mutual respect
391
1016260
2000
16:58
is to engage directly
392
1018260
2000
17:00
with the moral convictions
393
1020260
2000
17:02
citizens bring to public life,
394
1022260
3000
17:05
rather than to require
395
1025260
2000
17:07
that people leave their deepest moral convictions
396
1027260
3000
17:10
outside politics
397
1030260
2000
17:12
before they enter.
398
1032260
2000
17:14
That, it seems to me, is a way
399
1034260
2000
17:16
to begin to restore
400
1036260
2000
17:18
the art of democratic argument.
401
1038260
2000
17:20
Thank you very much.
402
1040260
2000
17:22
(Applause)
403
1042260
3000
17:25
Thank you.
404
1045260
2000
17:27
(Applause)
405
1047260
3000
17:30
Thank you.
406
1050260
2000
17:32
(Applause)
407
1052260
2000
17:34
Thank you very much.
408
1054260
2000
17:36
Thanks. Thank you.
409
1056260
2000
17:39
Chris.
410
1059260
2000
17:41
Thanks, Chris.
411
1061260
2000
17:44
Chris Anderson: From flutes to golf courses
412
1064260
2000
17:46
to same-sex marriage --
413
1066260
2000
17:48
that was a genius link.
414
1068260
2000
17:50
Now look, you're a pioneer of open education.
415
1070260
3000
17:53
Your lecture series was one of the first to do it big.
416
1073260
2000
17:55
What's your vision for the next phase of this?
417
1075260
3000
17:58
MS: Well, I think that it is possible.
418
1078260
3000
18:01
In the classroom, we have arguments
419
1081260
3000
18:04
on some of the most fiercely held
420
1084260
3000
18:07
moral convictions that students have
421
1087260
2000
18:09
about big public questions.
422
1089260
2000
18:11
And I think we can do that in public life more generally.
423
1091260
3000
18:14
And so my real dream would be
424
1094260
2000
18:16
to take the public television series
425
1096260
2000
18:18
that we've created of the course --
426
1098260
2000
18:20
it's available now, online,
427
1100260
2000
18:22
free for everyone anywhere in the world --
428
1102260
2000
18:24
and to see whether we can partner with institutions,
429
1104260
3000
18:27
at universities in China, in India,
430
1107260
2000
18:29
in Africa, around the world,
431
1109260
2000
18:31
to try to promote
432
1111260
3000
18:34
civic education
433
1114260
2000
18:36
and also a richer kind
434
1116260
2000
18:38
of democratic debate.
435
1118260
2000
18:41
CA: So you picture, at some point,
436
1121260
2000
18:43
live, in real time,
437
1123260
2000
18:45
you could have this kind of conversation, inviting questions,
438
1125260
3000
18:48
but with people from China and India joining in?
439
1128260
3000
18:51
MS: Right. We did a little bit of it here
440
1131260
2000
18:53
with 1,500 people in Long Beach,
441
1133260
2000
18:55
and we do it in a classroom at Harvard
442
1135260
3000
18:58
with about 1,000 students.
443
1138260
2000
19:00
Wouldn't it be interesting
444
1140260
2000
19:02
to take this way
445
1142260
3000
19:05
of thinking and arguing,
446
1145260
2000
19:07
engaging seriously with big moral questions,
447
1147260
3000
19:10
exploring cultural differences
448
1150260
2000
19:12
and connect through a live video hookup,
449
1152260
3000
19:16
students in Beijing and Mumbai
450
1156260
2000
19:18
and in Cambridge, Massachusetts
451
1158260
2000
19:20
and create a global classroom.
452
1160260
2000
19:22
That's what I would love to do.
453
1162260
2000
19:24
(Applause)
454
1164260
4000
19:28
CA: So, I would imagine
455
1168260
2000
19:30
that there are a lot of people who would love to join you in that endeavor.
456
1170260
3000
19:33
Michael Sandel. Thank you so much. (MS: Thanks so much.)
457
1173260
2000
About this website

This site will introduce you to YouTube videos that are useful for learning English. You will see English lessons taught by top-notch teachers from around the world. Double-click on the English subtitles displayed on each video page to play the video from there. The subtitles scroll in sync with the video playback. If you have any comments or requests, please contact us using this contact form.

https://forms.gle/WvT1wiN1qDtmnspy7