Yasheng Huang: Does democracy stifle economic growth?

80,393 views ・ 2011-09-12

TED


Please double-click on the English subtitles below to play the video.

00:15
My topic
0
15260
2000
00:17
is economic growth in China and India.
1
17260
3000
00:20
And the question I want to explore with you
2
20260
3000
00:23
is whether or not
3
23260
2000
00:25
democracy has helped or has hindered
4
25260
3000
00:28
economic growth.
5
28260
2000
00:30
You may say this is not fair,
6
30260
2000
00:32
because I'm selecting two countries
7
32260
3000
00:35
to make a case against democracy.
8
35260
3000
00:38
Actually, exactly the opposite
9
38260
3000
00:41
is what I'm going to do.
10
41260
2000
00:43
I'm going to use these two countries
11
43260
2000
00:45
to make an economic argument for democracy,
12
45260
3000
00:48
rather than against democracy.
13
48260
3000
00:51
The first question there
14
51260
2000
00:53
is why China has grown so much faster
15
53260
2000
00:55
than India.
16
55260
2000
00:57
Over the last 30 years,
17
57260
2000
00:59
in terms of the GDP growth rates,
18
59260
3000
01:02
China has grown at twice the rate of India.
19
62260
4000
01:06
In the last five years,
20
66260
2000
01:08
the two countries have begun to converge somewhat
21
68260
3000
01:11
in economic growth.
22
71260
2000
01:13
But over the last 30 years,
23
73260
2000
01:15
China undoubtedly
24
75260
2000
01:17
has done much better than India.
25
77260
3000
01:20
One simple answer
26
80260
2000
01:22
is China has Shanghai and India has Mumbai.
27
82260
3000
01:25
Look at the skyline of Shanghai.
28
85260
3000
01:28
This is the Pudong area.
29
88260
2000
01:30
The picture on India
30
90260
2000
01:32
is the Dharavi slum of Mumbai
31
92260
2000
01:34
in India.
32
94260
2000
01:36
The idea there
33
96260
2000
01:38
behind these two pictures
34
98260
2000
01:40
is that the Chinese government
35
100260
2000
01:42
can act above rule of law.
36
102260
2000
01:44
It can plan
37
104260
2000
01:46
for the long-term benefits of the country
38
106260
2000
01:48
and in the process,
39
108260
2000
01:50
evict millions of people --
40
110260
2000
01:52
that's just a small technical issue.
41
112260
3000
01:55
Whereas in India, you cannot do that,
42
115260
2000
01:57
because you have to listen to the public.
43
117260
3000
02:00
You're being constrained by the public's opinion.
44
120260
2000
02:02
Even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh
45
122260
3000
02:05
agrees with that view.
46
125260
2000
02:07
In an interview
47
127260
2000
02:09
printed in the financial press of India,
48
129260
2000
02:11
He said that he wants to make Mumbai
49
131260
3000
02:14
another Shanghai.
50
134260
2000
02:16
This is an Oxford-trained economist
51
136260
3000
02:19
steeped in humanistic values,
52
139260
4000
02:23
and yet he agrees
53
143260
2000
02:25
with the high-pressure tactics of Shanghai.
54
145260
3000
02:29
So let me call it the Shanghai model of economic growth,
55
149260
3000
02:32
that emphasizes the following features
56
152260
4000
02:36
for promoting economic development:
57
156260
2000
02:38
infrastructures, airports,
58
158260
2000
02:40
highways, bridges, things like that.
59
160260
3000
02:43
And you need a strong government to do that,
60
163260
3000
02:46
because you cannot respect private property rights.
61
166260
3000
02:49
You cannot be constrained by the public's opinion.
62
169260
3000
02:52
You need also state ownership,
63
172260
2000
02:54
especially of land assets,
64
174260
3000
02:57
in order to build and roll out infrastructures
65
177260
3000
03:00
very quickly.
66
180260
2000
03:02
The implication of that model
67
182260
2000
03:04
is that democracy
68
184260
2000
03:06
is a hindrance for economic growth,
69
186260
2000
03:08
rather than a facilitator of economic growth.
70
188260
4000
03:12
Here's the key question.
71
192260
2000
03:14
Just how important are infrastructures
72
194260
3000
03:17
for economic growth?
73
197260
2000
03:19
This is a key issue.
74
199260
2000
03:21
If you believe that infrastructures are very important for economic growth,
75
201260
4000
03:25
then you would argue a strong government is necessary
76
205260
3000
03:28
to promote growth.
77
208260
2000
03:30
If you believe
78
210260
2000
03:32
that infrastructures are not as important as many people believe,
79
212260
3000
03:35
then you will put less emphasis
80
215260
2000
03:37
on strong government.
81
217260
2000
03:39
So to illustrate that question,
82
219260
2000
03:41
let me give you two countries.
83
221260
2000
03:43
And for the sake of brevity,
84
223260
2000
03:45
I'll call one country Country 1
85
225260
2000
03:47
and the other country Country 2.
86
227260
2000
03:49
Country 1
87
229260
2000
03:51
has a systematic advantage over Country 2
88
231260
3000
03:54
in infrastructures.
89
234260
2000
03:56
Country 1 has more telephones,
90
236260
3000
03:59
and Country 1 has a longer system of railways.
91
239260
3000
04:02
So if I were to ask you,
92
242260
3000
04:05
"Which is China
93
245260
2000
04:07
and which is India,
94
247260
2000
04:09
and which country has grown faster?"
95
249260
2000
04:11
if you believe in the infrastructure view,
96
251260
3000
04:14
then you will say, "Country 1 must be China.
97
254260
3000
04:17
They must have done better, in terms of economic growth.
98
257260
2000
04:19
And Country 2 is possibly India."
99
259260
4000
04:23
Actually the country with more telephones
100
263260
3000
04:26
is the Soviet Union,
101
266260
2000
04:28
and the data referred to 1989.
102
268260
3000
04:31
After the country reported very impressive statistics on telephones,
103
271260
5000
04:36
the country collapsed.
104
276260
3000
04:39
That's not too good.
105
279260
2000
04:41
The picture there is Khrushchev.
106
281260
2000
04:43
I know that in 1989
107
283260
2000
04:45
he no longer ruled the Soviet Union,
108
285260
2000
04:47
but that's the best picture that I can find.
109
287260
3000
04:50
(Laughter)
110
290260
2000
04:52
Telephones, infrastructures
111
292260
2000
04:54
do not guarantee you economic growth.
112
294260
2000
04:56
Country 2, that has fewer telephones,
113
296260
3000
04:59
is China.
114
299260
2000
05:01
Since 1989,
115
301260
2000
05:03
the country has performed at a double-digit rate
116
303260
2000
05:05
every year for the last 20 years.
117
305260
3000
05:08
If you know nothing about China and the Soviet Union
118
308260
3000
05:11
other than the fact about their telephones,
119
311260
3000
05:14
you would have made a poor prediction
120
314260
2000
05:16
about their economic growth
121
316260
2000
05:18
in the next two decades.
122
318260
2000
05:20
Country 1, that has a longer system of railways,
123
320260
3000
05:23
is actually India.
124
323260
2000
05:25
And Country 2 is China.
125
325260
3000
05:28
This is a very little known fact
126
328260
3000
05:31
about the two countries.
127
331260
2000
05:33
Yes, today China has a huge infrastructure advantage
128
333260
2000
05:35
over India.
129
335260
2000
05:37
But for many years,
130
337260
2000
05:39
until the late 1990s,
131
339260
2000
05:41
China had an infrastructure disadvantage
132
341260
2000
05:43
vis-a-vis India.
133
343260
2000
05:45
In developing countries,
134
345260
2000
05:47
the most common mode of transportation
135
347260
3000
05:50
is the railways,
136
350260
2000
05:52
and the British built a lot of railways in India.
137
352260
3000
05:55
India is the smaller of the two countries,
138
355260
3000
05:58
and yet it had a longer system of railways
139
358260
3000
06:01
until the late 1990s.
140
361260
2000
06:03
So clearly,
141
363260
2000
06:05
infrastructure doesn't explain
142
365260
2000
06:07
why China did better before the late 1990s,
143
367260
3000
06:10
as compared with India.
144
370260
2000
06:12
In fact, if you look at the evidence worldwide,
145
372260
4000
06:16
the evidence is more supportive of the view
146
376260
3000
06:19
that the infrastructure are actually the result of economic growth.
147
379260
4000
06:23
The economy grows,
148
383260
2000
06:25
government accumulates more resources,
149
385260
2000
06:27
and the government can invest in infrastructure --
150
387260
3000
06:30
rather than infrastructure being a cause
151
390260
3000
06:33
for economic growth.
152
393260
2000
06:35
And this is clearly the story
153
395260
2000
06:37
of the Chinese economic growth.
154
397260
3000
06:40
Let me look at this question more directly.
155
400260
2000
06:42
Is democracy bad for economic growth?
156
402260
3000
06:45
Now let's turn to two countries,
157
405260
2000
06:47
Country A and Country B.
158
407260
3000
06:50
Country A, in 1990,
159
410260
2000
06:52
had about $300 per capita GDP
160
412260
3000
06:55
as compared with Country B,
161
415260
2000
06:57
which had $460 in per capita GDP.
162
417260
3000
07:00
By 2008,
163
420260
2000
07:02
Country A has surpassed Country B
164
422260
3000
07:05
with $700 per capita GDP
165
425260
3000
07:08
as compared with $650 per capita GDP.
166
428260
4000
07:12
Both countries are in Asia.
167
432260
2000
07:14
If I were to ask you,
168
434260
2000
07:16
"Which are the two Asian countries?
169
436260
2000
07:18
And which one is a democracy?"
170
438260
2000
07:20
you may argue,
171
440260
2000
07:22
"Well, maybe Country A is China
172
442260
2000
07:24
and Country B is India."
173
444260
2000
07:26
In fact, Country A
174
446260
2000
07:28
is democratic India,
175
448260
2000
07:30
and Country B is Pakistan --
176
450260
3000
07:33
the country that has a long period
177
453260
2000
07:35
of military rule.
178
455260
2000
07:37
And it's very common
179
457260
2000
07:39
that we compare India with China.
180
459260
4000
07:43
That's because the two countries
181
463260
2000
07:45
have about the same population size.
182
465260
3000
07:48
But the more natural comparison
183
468260
2000
07:50
is actually between India and Pakistan.
184
470260
2000
07:52
Those two countries are geographically similar.
185
472260
3000
07:55
They have a complicated, but shared common history.
186
475260
4000
07:59
By that comparison,
187
479260
2000
08:01
democracy looks very, very good
188
481260
2000
08:03
in terms of economic growth.
189
483260
3000
08:06
So why do economists fall in love
190
486260
3000
08:09
with authoritarian governments?
191
489260
3000
08:12
One reason is the East Asian Model.
192
492260
2000
08:14
In East Asia,
193
494260
2000
08:16
we have had successful economic growth stories
194
496260
3000
08:19
such as Korea, Taiwan,
195
499260
2000
08:21
Hong Kong and Singapore.
196
501260
2000
08:23
Some of these economies
197
503260
2000
08:25
were ruled by authoritarian governments
198
505260
2000
08:27
in the 60s and 70s
199
507260
2000
08:29
and 1980s.
200
509260
2000
08:31
The problem with that view
201
511260
2000
08:33
is like asking all the winners of lotteries,
202
513260
3000
08:36
"Have you won the lottery?"
203
516260
3000
08:39
And they all tell you, "Yes, we have won the lottery."
204
519260
2000
08:41
And then you draw the conclusion
205
521260
2000
08:43
the odds of winning the lottery
206
523260
3000
08:46
are 100 percent.
207
526260
2000
08:48
The reason is you never go
208
528260
2000
08:50
and bother to ask the losers
209
530260
2000
08:52
who also purchased lottery tickets
210
532260
2000
08:54
and didn't end up winning the prize.
211
534260
4000
08:58
For each of these successful authoritarian governments
212
538260
3000
09:01
in East Asia,
213
541260
2000
09:03
there's a matched failure.
214
543260
3000
09:06
Korea succeeded, North Korea didn't.
215
546260
3000
09:09
Taiwan succeeded, China under Mao Zedong didn't.
216
549260
3000
09:12
Burma didn't succeed.
217
552260
2000
09:14
The Philippines didn't succeed.
218
554260
2000
09:16
If you look at the statistical evidence worldwide,
219
556260
3000
09:19
there's really no support for the idea
220
559260
3000
09:22
that authoritarian governments
221
562260
2000
09:24
hold a systematic edge over democracies
222
564260
3000
09:27
in terms of economic growth.
223
567260
2000
09:29
So the East Asian model
224
569260
2000
09:31
has this massive selection bias --
225
571260
2000
09:33
it is known as selecting on a dependent variable,
226
573260
3000
09:36
something we always tell our students to avoid.
227
576260
4000
09:40
So exactly why did China grow so much faster?
228
580260
4000
09:45
I will take you to the Cultural Revolution,
229
585260
2000
09:47
when China went mad,
230
587260
2000
09:49
and compare that country's performance with India
231
589260
3000
09:52
under Indira Gandhi.
232
592260
2000
09:54
The question there is: Which country did better,
233
594260
3000
09:57
China or India?
234
597260
2000
09:59
China was during the Cultural Revolution.
235
599260
2000
10:01
It turns out even during the Cultural Revolution,
236
601260
2000
10:03
China out-perfomed India
237
603260
2000
10:05
in terms of GDP growth
238
605260
2000
10:07
by an average of about 2.2 percent every year
239
607260
3000
10:10
in terms of per capita GDP.
240
610260
3000
10:13
So that's when China was mad.
241
613260
2000
10:15
The whole country went mad.
242
615260
3000
10:18
It must mean that the country
243
618260
2000
10:20
had something so advantageous to itself in terms of economic growth
244
620260
4000
10:24
to overcome the negative effects
245
624260
3000
10:27
of the Cultural Revolution.
246
627260
2000
10:29
The advantage the country had
247
629260
2000
10:31
was human capital --
248
631260
3000
10:34
nothing else but human capital.
249
634260
2000
10:36
This is the world development index indicator data
250
636260
4000
10:40
in the early 1990s.
251
640260
2000
10:42
And this is the earliest data that I can find.
252
642260
3000
10:45
The adult literacy rate in China
253
645260
3000
10:48
is 77 percent
254
648260
2000
10:50
as compared with 48 percent in India.
255
650260
3000
10:53
The contrast in literacy rates
256
653260
3000
10:56
is especially sharp
257
656260
2000
10:58
between Chinese women and Indian women.
258
658260
3000
11:01
I haven't told you about the definition of literacy.
259
661260
4000
11:05
In China, the definition of literacy
260
665260
3000
11:08
is the ability to read and write
261
668260
2000
11:10
1,500 Chinese characters.
262
670260
3000
11:13
In India, the definition of literacy,
263
673260
3000
11:16
operating definition of literacy,
264
676260
2000
11:18
is the ability, the grand ability,
265
678260
3000
11:21
to write your own name
266
681260
2000
11:23
in whatever language you happen to speak.
267
683260
4000
11:27
The gap between the two countries in terms of literacy
268
687260
2000
11:29
is much more substantial
269
689260
2000
11:31
than the data here indicated.
270
691260
3000
11:34
If you go to other sources of data
271
694260
2000
11:36
such as Human Development Index,
272
696260
2000
11:38
that data series,
273
698260
2000
11:40
go back to the early 1970s,
274
700260
3000
11:43
you see exactly the same contrast.
275
703260
2000
11:45
China held a huge advantage
276
705260
2000
11:47
in terms of human capital
277
707260
2000
11:49
vis-a-vis India.
278
709260
2000
11:51
Life expectancies:
279
711260
2000
11:53
as early as 1965,
280
713260
2000
11:55
China had a huge advantage in life expectancy.
281
715260
4000
11:59
On average, as a Chinese in 1965,
282
719260
3000
12:02
you lived 10 years more
283
722260
2000
12:04
than an average Indian.
284
724260
2000
12:06
So if you have a choice
285
726260
2000
12:08
between being a Chinese and being an Indian,
286
728260
2000
12:10
you would want to become a Chinese
287
730260
2000
12:12
in order to live 10 years longer.
288
732260
3000
12:15
If you made that decision in 1965,
289
735260
2000
12:17
the down side of that
290
737260
2000
12:19
is the next year we have the Cultural Revolution.
291
739260
2000
12:21
So you have to always think carefully
292
741260
3000
12:24
about these decisions.
293
744260
2000
12:26
If you cannot chose your nationality,
294
746260
3000
12:29
then you will want to become an Indian man.
295
749260
3000
12:32
Because, as an Indian man,
296
752260
2000
12:34
you have about two years of life expectancy advantage
297
754260
3000
12:37
vis-a-vis Indian women.
298
757260
3000
12:40
This is an extremely strange fact.
299
760260
3000
12:43
It's very rare among countries
300
763260
3000
12:46
to have this kind of pattern.
301
766260
2000
12:48
It shows the systematic discrimination and biases
302
768260
3000
12:51
in the Indian society
303
771260
2000
12:53
against women.
304
773260
2000
12:55
The good news is, by 2006,
305
775260
2000
12:57
India has closed the gap
306
777260
2000
12:59
between men and women
307
779260
2000
13:01
in terms of life expectancy.
308
781260
3000
13:04
Today, Indian women have a sizable life expectancy edge
309
784260
3000
13:07
over Indian men.
310
787260
2000
13:09
So India is reverting to the normal.
311
789260
3000
13:12
But India still has a lot of work to do
312
792260
2000
13:14
in terms of gender equality.
313
794260
2000
13:16
These are the two pictures
314
796260
2000
13:18
taken of garment factories in Guangdong Province
315
798260
3000
13:21
and garment factories in India.
316
801260
3000
13:24
In China, it's all women.
317
804260
2000
13:26
60 to 80 percent of the workforce in China is women
318
806260
3000
13:29
in the coastal part of the country,
319
809260
2000
13:31
whereas in India, it's all men.
320
811260
3000
13:34
Financial Times printed this picture
321
814260
2000
13:36
of an Indian textile factory
322
816260
2000
13:38
with the title, "India Poised to Overtake China in Textile."
323
818260
4000
13:42
By looking at these two pictures,
324
822260
2000
13:44
I say no, it won't overtake China for a while.
325
824260
4000
13:48
If you look at other East Asian countries,
326
828260
2000
13:50
women there play a hugely important role
327
830260
4000
13:54
in terms of economic take-off --
328
834260
2000
13:56
in terms of creating the manufacturing miracle
329
836260
3000
13:59
associated with East Asia.
330
839260
2000
14:01
India still has a long way to go
331
841260
2000
14:03
to catch up with China.
332
843260
2000
14:05
Then the issue is,
333
845260
2000
14:07
what about the Chinese political system?
334
847260
2000
14:09
You talk about human capital,
335
849260
2000
14:11
you talk about education and public health.
336
851260
2000
14:13
What about the political system?
337
853260
2000
14:15
Isn't it true that the one-party political system
338
855260
3000
14:18
has facilitated economic growth in China?
339
858260
4000
14:22
Actually, the answer is more nuanced and subtle than that.
340
862260
4000
14:26
It depends on a distinction that you draw
341
866260
3000
14:29
between statics of the political system
342
869260
3000
14:32
and the dynamics of the political system.
343
872260
2000
14:34
Statically, China is a one-party system,
344
874260
3000
14:37
authoritarian -- there's no question about it.
345
877260
3000
14:40
Dynamically, it has changed over time
346
880260
3000
14:43
to become less authoritarian and more democratic.
347
883260
3000
14:46
When you explain change --
348
886260
2000
14:48
for example, economic growth;
349
888260
2000
14:50
economic growth is about change --
350
890260
2000
14:52
when you explain change,
351
892260
2000
14:54
you use other things that have changed to explain change,
352
894260
3000
14:57
rather than using the constant to explain change.
353
897260
4000
15:01
Sometimes a fixed effect can explain change,
354
901260
3000
15:04
but a fixed effect only explains changes
355
904260
3000
15:07
in interaction with the things that change.
356
907260
3000
15:10
In terms of the political changes,
357
910260
2000
15:12
they have introduced village elections.
358
912260
2000
15:14
They have increased the security of proprietors.
359
914260
4000
15:18
And they have increased the security
360
918260
3000
15:21
with long-term land leases.
361
921260
2000
15:23
There are also financial reforms in rural China.
362
923260
3000
15:26
There is also a rural entrepreneurial revolution in China.
363
926260
3000
15:29
To me, the pace of political changes
364
929260
3000
15:32
is too slow, too gradual.
365
932260
2000
15:34
And my own view is the country
366
934260
2000
15:36
is going to face some substantial challenges,
367
936260
2000
15:38
because they have not moved further and faster on political reforms.
368
938260
4000
15:42
But nevertheless,
369
942260
2000
15:44
the system has moved in a more liberal direction,
370
944260
3000
15:47
moved in a more democratic direction.
371
947260
3000
15:51
You can apply exactly the same dynamic perspective on India.
372
951260
4000
15:55
In fact, when India was growing
373
955260
2000
15:57
at a Hindu rate of growth --
374
957260
2000
15:59
about one percent, two percent a year --
375
959260
2000
16:01
that was when India was least democratic.
376
961260
3000
16:04
Indira Gandhi declared emergency rule in 1975.
377
964260
4000
16:08
The Indian government owned and operated
378
968260
3000
16:11
all the TV stations.
379
971260
2000
16:13
A little-known fact about India in the 1990s
380
973260
3000
16:16
is that the country
381
976260
2000
16:18
not only has undertaken economic reforms,
382
978260
3000
16:21
the country has also undertaken political reforms
383
981260
3000
16:24
by introducing village self-rule,
384
984260
3000
16:27
privatization of media
385
987260
3000
16:30
and introducing freedom of information acts.
386
990260
4000
16:34
So the dynamic perspective
387
994260
2000
16:36
fits both with China and in India
388
996260
2000
16:38
in terms of the direction.
389
998260
2000
16:40
Why do many people believe
390
1000260
3000
16:43
that India is still a growth disaster?
391
1003260
3000
16:46
One reason
392
1006260
2000
16:48
is they are always comparing India with China.
393
1008260
3000
16:51
But China is a superstar
394
1011260
2000
16:53
in terms of economic growth.
395
1013260
2000
16:55
If you are a NBA player
396
1015260
2000
16:57
and you are always being compared to Michael Jordan,
397
1017260
3000
17:00
you're going to look not so impressive.
398
1020260
2000
17:02
But that doesn't mean
399
1022260
2000
17:04
that you're a bad basketball player.
400
1024260
2000
17:06
Comparing with a superstar
401
1026260
2000
17:08
is the wrong benchmark.
402
1028260
2000
17:10
In fact, if you compare India
403
1030260
2000
17:12
with the average developing country,
404
1032260
2000
17:14
even before the more recent period
405
1034260
3000
17:17
of acceleration of Indian growth --
406
1037260
2000
17:19
now India is growing between eight and nine percent --
407
1039260
3000
17:22
even before this period,
408
1042260
2000
17:24
India was ranked fourth in terms of economic growth
409
1044260
3000
17:27
among emerging economies.
410
1047260
3000
17:30
This is a very impressive record indeed.
411
1050260
3000
17:34
Let's think about the future:
412
1054260
2000
17:36
the dragon vis-a-vis the elephant.
413
1056260
3000
17:39
Which country has the growth momentum?
414
1059260
3000
17:42
China, I believe, still has
415
1062260
3000
17:45
some of the excellent raw fundamentals --
416
1065260
3000
17:48
mostly the social capital,
417
1068260
2000
17:50
the public health,
418
1070260
2000
17:52
the sense of egalitarianism
419
1072260
2000
17:54
that you don't find in India.
420
1074260
2000
17:56
But I believe that India has the momentum.
421
1076260
2000
17:58
It has the improving fundamentals.
422
1078260
2000
18:00
The government has invested in basic education,
423
1080260
3000
18:03
has invested in basic health.
424
1083260
2000
18:05
I believe the government should do more,
425
1085260
2000
18:07
but nevertheless, the direction it is moving in
426
1087260
2000
18:09
is the right direction.
427
1089260
2000
18:11
India has the right institutional conditions
428
1091260
3000
18:14
for economic growth,
429
1094260
2000
18:16
whereas China is still struggling
430
1096260
2000
18:18
with political reforms.
431
1098260
2000
18:20
I believe that the political reforms are a must for China
432
1100260
3000
18:23
to maintain its growth.
433
1103260
3000
18:26
And it's very important to have political reforms,
434
1106260
2000
18:28
to have widely shared benefits of economic growth.
435
1108260
3000
18:31
I don't know whether that's going to happen or not,
436
1111260
2000
18:33
but I'm an optimist.
437
1113260
2000
18:35
Hopefully, five years from now, I'm going to report to TEDGlobal
438
1115260
3000
18:38
that political reforms will happen in China.
439
1118260
2000
18:40
Thank you very much.
440
1120260
2000
18:42
(Applause)
441
1122260
3000
About this website

This site will introduce you to YouTube videos that are useful for learning English. You will see English lessons taught by top-notch teachers from around the world. Double-click on the English subtitles displayed on each video page to play the video from there. The subtitles scroll in sync with the video playback. If you have any comments or requests, please contact us using this contact form.

https://forms.gle/WvT1wiN1qDtmnspy7