Nick Bostrom: Humanity's biggest problems aren't what you think they are

翻译人员: Yujian Li 校对人员: Zhu Jie

I want to talk today about --

今天我所要讲的是-

I've been asked to take the long view, and I'm going to tell you what

他们让我谈谈长远的观点-我要告诉你们

I think are the three biggest problems for humanity

我认为，从长远来看，

from this long point of view.

人类面临着三大问题。

Some of these have already been touched upon by other speakers,

其中有些问题已经被其他讲演者提到了，

which is encouraging.

这是很鼓舞人心的。

It seems that there's not just one person

看起来远不止一个人

who thinks that these problems are important.

认为这些问题意义重大。

The first is -- death is a big problem.

第一——死亡是一个重大的问题。

If you look at the statistics,

如果你看看统计数据，

the odds are not very favorable to us.

形式对我们来说并不乐观。

So far, most people who have lived have also died.

到目前为止，大部分曾经活过的人，都已经死了。

Roughly 90 percent of everybody who has been alive has died by now.

大致来说，所有人类中百分之九十的人目前已经死亡了.

So the annual death rate adds up to 150,000 --

因此，年死亡率总计就是15万——

sorry, the daily death rate -- 150,000 people per day,

对不起，日死亡率——每天15万人，

which is a huge number by any standard.

以任何标准看，这个数字都是巨大的。

The annual death rate, then, becomes 56 million.

那么，年死亡率就变成了5千6百万人。

If we just look at the single, biggest cause of death -- aging --

如果我们只着眼于死亡的最大的单一因素——衰老——

it accounts for roughly two-thirds of all human people who die.

大约有三分之二的人因此而死。

That adds up to an annual death toll

这些每年因衰老而死亡的人数

of greater than the population of Canada.

比加拿大的人口还要多。

Sometimes, we don't see a problem

有时，我们无视于问题之存在，

because either it's too familiar or it's too big.

因为要么这个问题太熟悉，要么这个问题太大了。

Can't see it because it's too big.

因为问题太大了，所以我们看不见。

I think death might be both too familiar and too big

我认为，死亡对我们来说，既过于熟悉也过于巨大

for most people to see it as a problem.

因此大多数人都不会把它当做一个问题来看待。

Once you think about it, you see this is not statistical points;

一旦你想一下，你就会发现这并不是统计数字而已。

these are -- let's see, how far have I talked?

这些是——让我看看，我讲了有多久了？

I've talked for three minutes.

我已经讲了三分钟。

So that would be, roughly, 324 people have died since I've begun speaking.

那么，从我开始讲话到现在，有大概324个人已经去世了。

People like -- it's roughly the population in this room has just died.

这个人数就像——大概有这个房间里的那么多人刚才去世了。

Now, the human cost of that is obvious,

死亡给人类带来的损失是很明显的。

once you start to think about it -- the suffering, the loss --

如果你开始细想——死亡带来的痛苦、损失

it's also, economically, enormously wasteful.

从经济上来说，这也是一种巨大的浪费。

I just look at the information, and knowledge, and experience

光从信息、知识和经验来看，

that is lost due to natural causes of death in general,

一般而言，它们都因人的自然死亡而消失了，

and aging, in particular.

尤其是因衰老而造成的死亡。

Suppose we approximated one person with one book?

假设我们把一个人比作一本书，

Now, of course, this is an underestimation.

当然，这对人来说是低估的。

A person's lifetime of learning and experience

一个人一生的学识和经验

is a lot more than you could put into a single book.

远不能为一本书所容纳。

But let's suppose we did this.

但让我们这么假设吧。

52 million people die of natural causes each year

每年有五千两百万人因自然原因而死亡

corresponds, then, to 52 million volumes destroyed.

那么，相应的，五千两百万册书也毁灭了。

Library of Congress holds 18 million volumes.

国会图书馆有一千八百万册藏书。

We are upset about the burning of the Library of Alexandria.

亚历山大图书馆被烧毁让我们深感惋惜。

It's one of the great cultural tragedies

这是一大文化悲剧

that we remember, even today.

我们直到今天还记忆犹新。

But this is the equivalent of three Libraries of Congress --

但死亡造成的损失，相当于每年有三座国会图书馆的藏书

burnt down, forever lost -- each year.

灰飞烟灭，永远消亡。

So that's the first big problem.

因此，这是第一个重大问题。

And I wish Godspeed to Aubrey de Grey,

我要祝奥布里·德·格雷（译者：研究永生的学者）

and other people like him,

和他的同行们成功，

to try to do something about this as soon as possible.

祝他们在这个问题上尽早有所进展。

Existential risk -- the second big problem.

存在风险——第二个重大问题。

Existential risk is a threat to human survival, or to the long-term potential of our species.

存在风险是对人类生存，或对整个人类种群的长远潜能的一种威胁。

Now, why do I say that this is a big problem?

为什么我会认为这是一个重大问题？

Well, let's first look at the probability --

让我们来看看可能性——

and this is very, very difficult to estimate --

这非常难估量——

but there have been only four studies on this in recent years,

但近年来，这个领域只出现了四篇研究文章。

which is surprising.

这很让人吃惊。

You would think that it would be of some interest

你可能会认为，既然厉害关系如此巨大，

to try to find out more about this given that the stakes are so big,

那么在这个领域做研究一定是有意义的。

but it's a very neglected area.

然而，这是一个被人们忽视的领域。

But there have been four studies --

但是，已经有了四篇研究——

one by John Lesley, wrote a book on this.

其中一篇由约翰·雷斯利所著，为这个问题写了一本书。

He estimated a probability that we will fail

据他估计，有50%的可能性

to survive the current century: 50 percent.

我们会在这个世纪灭亡。

Similarly, the Astronomer Royal, whom we heard speak yesterday,

类似的，皇家天文学家（名号）——我们昨天听过他的演讲——

also has a 50 percent probability estimate.

的估算结果也是50%。

Another author doesn't give any numerical estimate,

另外一个作者并没有给出任何数据估算，

but says the probability is significant that it will fail.

但他指出，人类灭亡的可能性非常高。

I wrote a long paper on this.

我就这个问题写了一篇长篇论文

I said assigning a less than 20 percent probability would be a mistake

我在文章里指出，根据现有的证据，

in light of the current evidence we have.

任何低于20%的可能性估算都应该是错误的。

Now, the exact figures here,

对于这里的具体数字，

we should take with a big grain of salt,

我们不应该全盘相信，

but there seems to be a consensus that the risk is substantial.

但人们似乎对此达成共识，风险的确不小。

Everybody who has looked at this and studied it agrees.

每个看过并研究过这方面的人，都会同意。

Now, if we think about what just reducing

那么，如果我们考虑

the probability of human extinction by just one percentage point --

将人类灭绝的可能性几率只减少一个百分点——

not very much -- so that's equivalent to 60 million lives saved,

并不是很多——那就相当于拯救了六千万的生命，

if we just count the currently living people, the current generation.

而这只是计算现存的人类，当代人口。

Now one percent of six billion people is equivalent to 60 million.

那么六十亿人的百分之一相当于六千万。

So that's a large number.

这是一个很大的数字。

If we were to take into account future generations

如果我们把未来的人口也算进来

that will never come into existence if we blow ourselves up,

如果我们把自己毁灭了，未来人口也永不会存在，

then the figure becomes astronomical.

那么这数字就变成天文数字了。

If we could eventually colonize a chunk of the universe --

如果我们最终可以开拓宇宙的一角为生存地——

the Virgo supercluster --

比如室女座超星系团——

maybe it will take us 100 million years to get there,

可能我们需要一亿年才能到达那儿，

but if we go extinct we never will.

但如果我们灭亡了，我们永远也到不了

Then, even a one percentage point reduction

那么，即使是减少百分之一

in the extinction risk could be equivalent

的灭绝风险，那将等同于

to this astronomical number -- 10 to the power of 32.

这个极为庞大的数字——10的32次方。

So if you take into account future generations as much as our own,

那么，如果你像关心我们自己一样关心我们的后代，

every other moral imperative of philanthropic cost just becomes irrelevant.

所有其他基于道义责任的慈善都变得无关紧要。

The only thing you should focus on

你所应该关注的唯一事情

would be to reduce existential risk

就是减少生存风险

because even the tiniest decrease in existential risk

因为即使只减少极少的一点生存风险，

would just overwhelm any other benefit you could hope to achieve.

其带来的好处也可以覆盖其它任何你希望获得的利益。

And even if you just look at the current people,

另外，如果你仅仅关注现在的人类，

and ignore the potential that would be lost if we went extinct,

而忽略那些一旦我们灭绝后可能失去的潜能，

it should still have a high priority.

减少存在风险也仍旧值得优先考虑。

Now, let me spend the rest of my time on the third big problem,

现在，让我把余下的时间花在对第三个重大问题的探讨上。

because it's more subtle and perhaps difficult to grasp.

因为这个问题更加微妙，也可能难以把握。

Think about some time in your life --

试着回忆一下你生命中的某些时刻——

some people might never have experienced it -- but some people,

有些人可能从未体会过——但有些人

there are just those moments that you have experienced

在他们生命的某些时刻

where life was fantastic.

体会到生命的美妙。

It might have been at the moment of some great, creative inspiration

它可能是当你进入心流体验时

you might have had when you just entered this flow stage.

所经历的很棒的，产生创造性灵感的时候。

Or when you understood something you had never done before.

或者是当你弄懂了某件以往从未涉足的事情的时刻。

Or perhaps in the ecstasy of romantic love.

或者是浪漫爱情中那销魂迷醉的时刻。

Or an aesthetic experience -- a sunset or a great piece of art.

或者是一种对美感的欣赏——如一次落日，或一幅名画。

Every once in a while we have these moments,

时不时的，我们便会经历这样的时刻，

and we realize just how good life can be when it's at its best.

我们意识到，生命最美好的时刻是多么令人陶醉。

And you wonder, why can't it be like that all the time?

然后你就想，为什么生活不能总是那么美好呢?

You just want to cling onto this.

你就是想抓住此刻不放。

And then, of course, it drifts back into ordinary life and the memory fades.

然后呢，当然，生活又回到了常态，美好记忆悄然消退。

And it's really difficult to recall, in a normal frame of mind,

对我们来说，以一颗平常之心是非常难以回想

just how good life can be at its best.

生活在最精彩的时候是多么的美好，

Or how bad it can be at its worst.

或在最差劲的时候是多么的糟糕。

The third big problem is that life isn't usually

第三个重大问题是，生命通常达不到

as wonderful as it could be.

它可能达到的美妙状态。

I think that's a big, big problem.

我想这是一个非常，非常大的问题。

It's easy to say what we don't want.

我们很容易指出出我们不喜欢的东西。

Here are a number of things that we don't want --

以下都是我们避之而不及的东西——

illness, involuntary death, unnecessary suffering, cruelty,

疾病、非自愿死亡、不必要的痛苦、残酷、

stunted growth, memory loss, ignorance, absence of creativity.

发育停滞、健忘症、无知，以及缺乏创造力。

Suppose we fixed these things -- we did something about all of these.

假设我们解决了这些问题——我们对所有这些都采取些措施。

We were very successful.

我们对此非常成功。

We got rid of all of these things.

我们摆脱了所有这些难题。

We might end up with something like this,

我们可能会变成这样。

which is -- I mean, it's a heck of a lot better than that.

我的意思是，这将比原来的境况要好一百倍，

But is this really the best we can dream of?

但是，这真的是我们能想到的最好结果吗？

Is this the best we can do?

这真的是我们所能做的最好程度吗？

Or is it possible to find something a little bit more inspiring to work towards?

还是有可能找到一些更加鼓舞人心的目标来为之奋斗？

And if we think about this,

如果我们这样想，

I think it's very clear that there are ways

我认为，有一点非常明确，那就是

in which we could change things, not just by eliminating negatives,

如果想改变现状，除了消除负面因素，

but adding positives.

还可以增加积极因素。

On my wish list, at least, would be:

至少在我的愿望清单上会有——

much longer, healthier lives, greater subjective well-being,

更长久、更健康的幸福，更美满的康乐安宁，

enhanced cognitive capacities, more knowledge and understanding,

更强的认知能力，更多的知识和领悟力，

unlimited opportunity for personal growth

超越目前人类生物极限的无限的个人成长机会，

beyond our current biological limits, better relationships,

更好的人际关系，

an unbounded potential for spiritual, moral

更宽广的精神，道德

and intellectual development.

以及才智方面的发展空间。

If we want to achieve this, what, in the world, would have to change?

如果我们想达到这些目标，世界应如何改变？

And this is the answer -- we would have to change.

答案是——该改变的是我们。

Not just the world around us, but we, ourselves.

不仅仅改变我们周围的世界，更应该改变我们自己。

Not just the way we think about the world, but the way we are -- our very biology.

不仅仅改变我们看待世界的方式，还有我们自身存在的方式——我们自身的生物特性。

Human nature would have to change.

人类本质必须要改变。

Now, when we think about changing human nature,

那么，当我们考虑改变人类本质时，

the first thing that comes to mind

首先想到的

are these human modification technologies --

便是那些人类改造技术——

growth hormone therapy, cosmetic surgery,

荷尔蒙生长疗法，整容手术，

stimulants like Ritalin, Adderall, anti-depressants,

如利他林，安非他命缓释剂之类的兴奋剂，抗抑郁剂，

anabolic steroids, artificial hearts.

合成代谢类固醇，人造心脏。

It's a pretty pathetic list.

这是一张可悲的清单。

They do great things for a few people

这些技术极大地帮助了一部分人，

who suffer from some specific condition,

这些人患有某些特定的病症。

but for most people, they don't really transform

但对与大多数人来说，它们并不能真正改变

what it is to be human.

人的本质。

And they also all seem a little bit --

并且，它们看起来也有点——

most people have this instinct that, well, sure,

大多数人都会本能地认为，

there needs to be anti-depressants for the really depressed people.

虽然抗抑郁剂对严重抑郁的人来说确实是必须的，

But there's a kind of queasiness

但这里面总有一点让人不舒服的成分，

that these are unnatural in some way.

因为在某种程度上说，这毕竟是很不自然的。

It's worth recalling that there are a lot of other

值得一提的是，有许多其他的

modification technologies and enhancement technologies that we use.

改造技术和改善技术供我们使用。

We have skin enhancements, clothing.

我们有改善皮肤的产品，服装。

As far as I can see, all of you are users of this

据我的观察，你们所有人都是

enhancement technology in this room, so that's a great thing.

这改善技术的使用者，所以这是个好东西。

Mood modifiers have been used from time immemorial --

自古以来，情绪改善剂就一直为人们所使用——

caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, immune system enhancement,

咖啡因、酒精、尼古丁、免疫系统增强剂、

vision enhancement, anesthetics --

视力增强品、麻醉剂。

we take that very much for granted,

我们通常认为这些是理所当然的，没什么稀奇，

but just think about how great progress that is --

但想想看这是多么伟大的进步——

like, having an operation before anesthetics was not fun.

比如，不实施麻醉而进行手术可不是好玩的。

Contraceptives, cosmetics and brain reprogramming techniques --

避孕药、美容用品和大脑重新编程技术——

that sounds ominous,

听起来并不像什么好事。

but the distinction between what is a technology --

但技术——典型的例子就是小装置，

a gadget would be the archetype --

以及其他改变和重塑人类本质的方法，

and other ways of changing and rewriting human nature is quite subtle.

这两者的差别很微妙。

So if you think about what it means to learn arithmetic or to learn to read,

因此，如果你思考学习算术和阅读意义何在，

you're actually, literally rewriting your own brain.

那实际上你就是在重写你自己的大脑。

You're changing the microstructure of your brain as you go along.

你在学习的过程中，也正在改变大脑的微型结构。

So in a broad sense, we don't need to think about technology

所以，广义而言，我们不必认为技术

as only little gadgets, like these things here,

只是一些小装置，如上面列举的那些。

but even institutions and techniques,

还应包括甚至像制度，技能，

psychological methods and so forth.

心理学方法等等。

Forms of organization can have a profound impact on human nature.

组织机构的不同形式可对人类本质产生深远影响。

Looking ahead, there is a range of technologies

遥望未来，一系列技术

that are almost certain to be developed sooner or later.

迟早会被研发出来。

We are very ignorant about what the time scale for these things are,

虽然我们对这些技术何时面世一无所知，

but they all are consistent with everything we know

但它们必然与我们所知的一切知识相一致，

about physical laws, laws of chemistry, etc.

包括物理定律、化学定律等等。

It's possible to assume,

我们可以假定，

setting aside a possibility of catastrophe,

排除人类遭受大灾难的可能性，

that sooner or later we will develop all of these.

迟早我们都会发展出所有这些技术。

And even just a couple of these would be enough

而且，仅仅这其中的几项就足够

to transform the human condition.

改变人类的处境。

So let's look at some of the dimensions of human nature

那么，让我们看看人类本质中哪些部分

that seem to leave room for improvement.

是有进步空间的。

Health span is a big and urgent thing,

寿命长短是一个巨大而紧迫的问题，

because if you're not alive,

因为如果你死了，

then all the other things will be to little avail.

那么所有其他事情都一无所用了。

Intellectual capacity -- let's take that box,

智力——看那个方框，

which falls into a lot of different sub-categories:

它可以分为许多不同的子目录——

memory, concentration, mental energy, intelligence, empathy.

记忆力，注意力，精神能量，理解力，情感共鸣。

These are really great things.

这些都是非常美妙的东西。

Part of the reason why we value these traits

我们之所以重视这些特质，一方面是因为

is that they make us better at competing with other people --

它们能令我们在与他人的竞争中处于更有利的位置，

they're positional goods.

所以它们是地位商品。

But part of the reason --

但另一方面的原因——

and that's the reason why we have ethical ground for pursuing these --

即从人类的本质上看，它们也是很有价值的，

is that they're also intrinsically valuable.

这也是为什么我们拥有追求这些特质的道德基础。

It's just better to be able to understand more of the world around you

去理解你周围的世界和人

and the people that you are communicating with,

以及记住所学的知识，

and to remember what you have learned.

能让你变得更好。

Modalities and special faculties.

不同的模式和特殊能力.

Now, the human mind is not a single unitary information processor,

人类的思维并不是一个单一的信息处理器，

but it has a lot of different, special, evolved modules

相反，它拥有许多不同的、特殊的、已进化的模块，

that do specific things for us.

这些模块各司其职，为我们服务。

If you think about what we normally take as giving life a lot of its meaning --

想一下那些通常我们认为赋予生活许多意义的事物——

music, humor, eroticism, spirituality, aesthetics,

音乐、幽默、性爱、灵性、美学

nurturing and caring, gossip, chatting with people --

养育和关心、八卦、与他人聊天。

all of these, very likely, are enabled by a special circuitry

所有的这些，都类似的由一个特殊的

that we humans have,

每个人都具备的电路所启动，

but that you could have another intelligent life form that lacks these.

但很可能，另外一种智慧生命形态却没有这些装置。

We're just lucky that we have the requisite neural machinery

我们只是幸运地拥有了这种必备的神经装置

to process music and to appreciate it and enjoy it.

来处理音乐，欣赏它，并从中得到乐趣。

All of these would enable, in principle -- be amenable to enhancement.

所有的这些，从原则上说，都可以以某些方式改进。

Some people have a better musical ability

有些人拥有比他人优秀的音乐能力

and ability to appreciate music than others have.

及更好的音乐欣赏能力。

It's also interesting to think about what other things are --

如果想想其它事物的情况，那会很有意思

so if these all enabled great values,

那么，如果这些事物都能带来宝贵的价值，

why should we think that evolution has happened to provide us

为什么我们要认为，这些模式，

with all the modalities we would need to engage

这些我们要用来与其他可能存在的价值体系来沟通的模式，

with other values that there might be?

是由进化凑巧提供的呢？

Imagine a species

假设有这样一个物种

that just didn't have this neural machinery for processing music.

它们刚好没有能够处理音乐的神经装置。

And they would just stare at us with bafflement

当我们花时间聆听一曲美妙的演奏时，

when we spend time listening to a beautiful performance,

就像我们刚听到的那支，

like the one we just heard -- because of people making stupid movements,

它们只能迷惑的盯着我们，因为觉得人们在做愚蠢的举动。

and they would be really irritated and wouldn't see what we were up to.

并且它们会变得很烦躁，不知道我们到底在干什么。

But maybe they have another faculty, something else

但是，它们可能具有另外一种能力，

that would seem equally irrational to us,

一种同样对我们来说毫无意义的东西，

but they actually tap into some great possible value there.

但它们的确会在这方面开发出一些美好的可能的价值。

But we are just literally deaf to that kind of value.

但我们对那种价值就是充耳不闻。

So we could think of adding on different,

因此，我们可以考虑增加不同的

new sensory capacities and mental faculties.

新式的感官机能和精神能力。

Bodily functionality and morphology and affective self-control.

身体功能、形态以及情感自我控制。

Greater subjective well-being.

更高层次的主观幸福。

Be able to switch between relaxation and activity --

能够在放松和活动之间转换

being able to go slow when you need to do that, and to speed up.

能够根据需要，或放慢速度或加快步伐。

Able to switch back and forth more easily

能够进退更加自如

would be a neat thing to be able to do --

是件很棒的事，

easier to achieve the flow state,

它可以让我们更加容易进入心流状态，

when you're totally immersed in something you are doing.

即一种完全沉浸于所做之事时的状态。

Conscientiousness and sympathy.

责任心和同情心。

The ability to -- it's another interesting application

这另一种有趣的能力

that would have large social ramification, perhaps.

会带来巨大的社会分歧问题。

If you could actually choose to preserve your romantic attachments to one person,

如果你真的能够保存你对另一个人的浪漫爱恋，

undiminished through time,

不受时光侵蚀，

so that wouldn't have to -- love would never have to fade if you didn't want it to.

那么，爱情就会随你心意，永葆灿烂。

That's probably not all that difficult.

这也许并不是太难做到的事情。

It might just be a simple hormone or something that could do this.

可能只需要一种普通激素或其它什么材料。

It's been done in voles.

人们在田鼠身上做过这种实验。

You can engineer a prairie vole to become monogamous

本性上是一雄多雌制的草原田鼠，经过改造后，

when it's naturally polygamous.

可变为一雄一雌制。

It's just a single gene.

只是单一基因的转变

Might be more complicated in humans, but perhaps not that much.

对于人类这可能更加复杂，但也许并不那么麻烦。

This is the last picture that I want to --

这是我想讨论的最后一张图片

now we've got to use the laser pointer.

现在我们要用镭射指针了。

A possible mode of being here would be a way of life --

一种可能存在的模式，是一种生活的方式

a way of being, experiencing, thinking, seeing,

一种存在、经历、思考、观察、

interacting with the world.

及与世界互动的方式。

Down here in this little corner, here, we have the little sub-space

在下面这里的小角落里，我们可以看到这个子空间

of this larger space that is accessible to human beings --

存在于这片较大的、属于我们

beings with our biological capacities.

这种具有人类能力的生物可及的空间。

It's a part of the space that's accessible to animals;

这空间属于更大的动物可及空间的一部分——

since we are animals, we are a subset of that.

因为我们也是动物，所以我们属于动物的分支。

And then you can imagine some enhancements of human capacities.

那么我们可以想象对人类的能力进行一些改善。

There would be different modes of being you could experience

你可能可以体验不同的存在模式，

if you were able to stay alive for, say, 200 years.

假设你能活到200岁吧。

Then you could live sorts of lives and accumulate wisdoms

那么你就可以体验不同的生活并积累智慧，

that are just not possible for humans as we currently are.

而以我们现阶段的人类形态，我们是无法做到的。

So then, you move off to this larger sphere of "human +,"

那么，然后我们迈步来到这片更大的人类空间，

and you could continue that process and eventually

我们不断地前进，

explore a lot of this larger space of possible modes of being.

最终，在这片更大的空间，我们可以探索许多可能的生存方式。

Now, why is that a good thing to do?

那么，为什么这么做有益呢？

Well, we know already that in this little human circle there,

我们已经知道，在这片小小的人类空间中，

there are these enormously wonderful and worthwhile modes of being --

有极多美妙和宝贵的生存模式

human life at its best is wonderful.

人类生活的最高境界是美好的。

We have no reason to believe that within this much, much larger space

我们没有理由不相信，在这片更大的空间中

there would not also be extremely worthwhile modes of being,

会存在更多极其宝贵的生存方式。

perhaps ones that would be way beyond our wildest ability

它们可能大大超越我们智慧的极限，

even to imagine or dream about.

我们甚至做梦也无法想象得到。

And so, to fix this third problem,

因此，要解决这第三个问题

I think we need -- slowly, carefully, with ethical wisdom and constraint --

我认为我们需要缓慢地，仔细地，带着道德智慧和自制力

develop the means that enable us to go out in this larger space and explore it

来发展一些方式让我们能够走进并探索这片更宽广的空间。

and find the great values that might hide there.

并且找到那里可能隐藏着的巨大价值。

Thanks.

谢谢。