The four fish we're overeating -- and what to eat instead | Paul Greenberg

Prevoditelj: Senzos Osijek Recezent: Ivan Stamenković

So when I was a kid ...

Dakle, kada sam bio dijete...

this was my team.

ovo je bio moj tim.

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

I stunk at sports.

Bio sam loš u sportovima.

I didn't like to play them, I didn't like to watch them.

Nisam ih volio igrati, niti sam ih volio gledati.

So this is what I did. I went fishing.

Ovo je ono što sam ja radio. Išao sam pecati.

And for all of my growing up I fished on the shores of Connecticut,

Cijelo svoje djetinjstvo pecao sam na obalama Connecticuta,

and these are the creatures that I saw on a regular basis.

I ovo su bića koja sam svakodnevno gledao.

But after I grew up and went to college,

Ali nakon što sam odrastao i otišao na fakultet,

and I came home in the early 90's,

i došao kući u ranim devedesetima,

this is what I found.

pronašao sam ovo.

My team had shrunk.

Moj tim se smanjio.

It was like literally having your roster devastated.

To je doslovno bilo kao da se vaš tim uništio.

And as I sort of looked into that,

A ja sam nekako na to gledao,

from a very personal point of view as a fisherman,

sa vrlo osobnog stajališta, kao ribar.

I started to kind of figure out,

Onda sam se počeo pitati,

well, what was the rest of the world thinking about it?

što ostatak svijeta misli o tome?

First place I started to look was fish markets.

Prvo gdje sam tražio odgovor bile su ribarnice.

And when I went to fish markets,

Kada sam otišao u ribarnice,

in spite of where I was --

neovisno gdje sam bio --

whether I was in North Carolina, or Paris, or London, or wherever --

bila to Sjeverna Karolina, ili Pariz, ili London, bilo gdje --

I kept seeing this weirdly repeating trope of four creatures,

Neprestano sam viđao četiri vrste čudnih bića,

again and again --

opet i opet --

on the menus, on ice --

na jelovnicima, na ledu --

shrimp, tuna, salmon and cod.

škamp, tuna, losos i bakalar.

And I thought this was pretty strange,

Pomislio sam kako je ovo čudno,

and as I looked at it, I was wondering,

i dok sam gledao, pitao sam se,

did anyone else notice this sort of shrinking of the market?

da li je još netko primjetio ovoliko smanjenje ponude ?

Well, when I looked into it,

No, kada sam bolje pogledao,

I realized that people didn't look at it as their team.

Shvatio sam da ljudi nisu gledali na njih kao na svoj tim.

Ordinary people, the way they looked at seafood was like this.

Način na koji su obični ljudi gledali na morsku ribu bio je ovakav.

It's not an unusual human characteristic

Nije neobična ljudska karakteristika

to reduce the natural world down to very few elements.

da smanji prirodu na nekoliko elemenata.

We did it before, 10,000 years ago, when we came out of our caves.

Učinili smo to prije 10,000 godina, kada smo izašli iz svojih špilja.

If you look at fire pits from 10,000 years ago,

Ako pogledate ognjišta prije 10,000 godina,

you'll see raccoons, you'll see, you know, wolves,

vidjeti ćete rakune, vidjeti ćete, znate, vukove,

you'll see all kinds of different creatures.

vidjeti ćete puno različitih bića.

But if you telescope to the age of -- you know, 2,000 years ago,

Ali ako se prebacimo u razdoblje prije 2,000 godina

you'll see these four mammals:

vidjeti ćete ova četiri sisavca:

pigs, cows, sheep and goats.

svinje, krave, ovce i koze.

It's true of birds, too.

Isto je i za ptice.

You look at the menus in New York City restaurants

I pogledamo u jelovnike u restoranima u New Yorku

150 years ago, 200 years ago,

Prije 150, 200 godina,

you'll see snipe, woodcock, grouse, dozens of ducks, dozens of geese.

vidjeti ćete šljuke, divlje kokoške, desetke patki, desetke gusaka.

But telescope ahead to the age of modern animal husbandry,

Prebacimo li se u razdoblje modernog stočarstva,

and you'll see four:

vidjeti ćete ove četiri vrste:

turkeys, ducks, chicken and geese.

Purice, patke, kokoši i guske.

So it makes sense that we've headed in this direction.

Tako da ima smisla Što smo krenuli u ovom smjeru.

But how have we headed in this direction?

Ali kako smo uopće krenuli u tom smjeru?

Well ...

Pa...

first it's a very, very new problem.

prije svega, to je novi problem.

This is the way we've been fishing the oceans over the last 50 years.

To je način na koji smo lovili po oceanima zadnjih 50 godina.

World War II was a tremendous incentive to arm ourselves in a war against fish.

Drugi svjetski rat je bio veliki poticaj da se naoružamo u ratu protiv riba.

All of the technology that we perfected during World War II --

Sva tehnologija koju smo usavršili tijekom Drugog svijetskog rata

sonar, lightweight polymers --

sonari, lagani polimeri --

all these things were redirected towards fish.

sve te stvari su bile usmjerene prema ribama.

And so you see this tremendous buildup in fishing capacity,

Tako da vidite ovo veliko pojačavanje kapaciteta ribolova,

quadrupling in the course of time,

koje se četiri puta više povećalo

from the end of World War II to the present time.

od Drugog svjetskog rata do danas.

And right now that means

Trenutno to znači

we're taking between 80 and 90 million metric tons out of the sea every year.

da uzimamo između 80 u 90 milijuna metričkih tona ribe iz mora svake godine.

That's the equivalent of the human weight of China

To je jednako ljudskoj težini Kine

taken out of the sea every year.

uzetoj iz mora svake godine.

And it's no coincidence that I use China as the example

Nije slučajnost da koristim Kinu kao primjer

because China is now the largest fishing nation in the world.

Zato što je Kina prva zemlja u svijetu što se tiče ribolova.

Well, that's only half the story.

No, to je tek pola priče.

The other half of the story

Druga polovica priče

is this incredible boom in fish farming and aquaculture,

je izvanredan uspon u ribljem uzgoju i akvakulturi.

which is now, only in the last year or two,

što je danas, samo u zadnje godinu, dvije,

starting to exceed the amount of wild fish that we produce.

Počelo povećavati količinu divlje ribe koju proizvodimo.

So that if you add wild fish and farmed fish together,

Pa tako ako dodate divlju i uzgojenu ribu,

you get the equivalent of two Chinas created from the ocean

dobijete ekvivalent od dvije Kine stvorene iz oceana

each and every year.

svake godine.

And again, it's not a coincidence that I use China as the example,

Ponavljam, nije slučajnost da koristim Kinu kao primjer,

because China, in addition to being the biggest catcher of fish,

zato što Kina, osim što je broj jedan u ribolovu,

is also the biggest farmer of fish.

također je najveći uzgajivač ribe.

So let's look though at the four choices we are making right now.

Pogledajmo sada četiri izbora riba.

The first one --

Prva,

by far the most consumed seafood in America and in much of the West,

najviše konzumirana morska riba u Americi i na zapadu

is shrimp.

je škamp.

Shrimp in the wild -- as a wild product --

Škamp u divljini Kao proizvod divljine

is a terrible product.

je užasan proizvod.

5, 10, 15 pounds of wild fish are regularly killed

2, 4, 6 kilograma divlje ribe se redovito ubija

to bring one pound of shrimp to the market.

da bi se dobio jedan kilogram škampa na tržištu.

They're also incredibly fuel inefficient to bring to the market.

Također su iznimno energetski neučinkoviti za prijenos na tržište.

In a recent study that was produced out of Dalhousie University,

U zadnjem istraživanju koje je provelo Dalhousie University,

it was found that dragging for shrimp

ustanovljeno je da je lov na škampe

is one of the most carbon-intensive ways of fishing that you can find.

jedan od najvećih visoko ugljičnih načina koje se može loviti.

So you can farm them,

Tako da ih možete uzgajati,

and people do farm them,

ljudi ih zaista uzgajaju,

and they farm them a lot in this very area.

i uzgajaju ih najviše na tom području.

Problem is ...

Problem je...

the place where you farm shrimp is in these wild habitats --

taj što su mjesta na kojima se uzgajaju u divljem staništu,

in mangrove forests.

Uumangrovim šumama.

Now look at those lovely roots coming down.

Pogledajte divno korijenje koje se spušta.

Those are the things that hold soil together,

Zadržavaju zemlju,

protect coasts, create habitats for all sorts of young fish, young shrimp,

štiti obale, stvara staništa za sve vrste mladih riba, mladih škampa,

all sorts of things that are important to this environment.

i sve ostale važne stvari koje su bitne za okoliš.

Well, this is what happens to a lot of coastal mangrove forests.

Dakle, ovo se događa u većini obalnih mangrovnih šuma.

We've lost millions of acres of coastal mangroves

Izgubili smo milijune hektara obalnih mangrova

over the last 30 or 40 years.

u zadnjih 30 do 40 godina.

That rate of destruction has slowed,

Ta stopa uništenja se usporila,

but we're still in a major mangrove deficit.

ali smo i dalje u velikom deficitu mangrovnih šuma.

The other thing that's going on here

Još jedna stvar koja se ovdje događa

is a phenomenon that the filmmaker Mark Benjamin called "Grinding Nemo."

Je fenomen redatelja Marka Benjamina zvan ''mljevenje Nema''.

This phenomenon is very, very relevant

Ovaj fenomen je jako, jako relevantan

to anything that you've ever seen on a tropical reef.

za sve što ste ikada vidjeli na tropskom grebenu.

Because what's going on right now,

Jer ono što se sada događa je to

we have shrimp draggers dragging for shrimp,

da imamo lovce na škampe,

catching a huge amount of bycatch,

koji love velike količine neželjenih riba

that bycatch in turn gets ground up and turned into shrimp food.

Koje budu prerađene u hranu za škampe.

And sometimes, many of these vessels --

I često ove brodice --

manned by slaves --

kojima upravljaju robovi --

are catching these so-called "trash fish,"

love ribu koja je ''smeće'',

fish that we would love to see on a reef,

ribu koju bismo htjeli vidjeti na grebenima,

grinding them up

melju ih

and turning them into shrimp feed --

i pretvaraju u hranu za škampe --

an ecosystem literally eating itself and spitting out shrimp.

ekosustav koji jede sam sebe i ispljune škampe.

The next most consumed seafood in America,

Sljedeća najviše konzumirana riba u Americi,

and also throughout the West,

i također na zapadu,

is tuna.

je tuna.

So tuna is this ultimate global fish.

Tuna je univerzalna riba.

These huge management areas have to be observed

Velika područja moraju biti čuvana

in order for tuna to be well managed.

kako bi se tuna dobro kontrolirala.

Our own management area,

Naše kontrolno područje

called a Regional Fisheries Management Organization,

zove se Regionalna upravna organizacija ribarnica,

is called ICCAT,

tj. ICCAT -

the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas.

Međunarodna komisija za očuvanje atlantskih tuna.

The great naturalist Carl Safina once called it,

Veliki prirodnjak Carl Safina je to jednom nazvao

"The International Conspiracy to Catch all the Tunas."

''Internacionalna Urota za Lov svih Tuna''.

Of course we've seen incredible improvement

Naravno, vidjeli smo veliki napredak

in ICCAT in the last few years,

u ICCAT-u zadnjih par godina,

there is total room for improvement,

ima puno mjesta za napredak,

but it remains to be said that tuna is a global fish,

ali i dalje tvrde da je tuna globalna riba,

and to manage it, we have to manage the globe.

i da bismo to promjenili moramo promjeniti svijet.

Well, we could also try to grow tuna

Možemo pokušati i uzgajati tunu,

but tuna is a spectacularly bad animal for aquaculture.

ali tuna je spektakularno loša životinja za akvakulturu.

Many people don't know this but tuna are warm-blooded.

Većina ljudi ne zna da je tuna toplokrvna.

They can heat their bodies 20 degrees above ambient temperature,

Mogu se zagrijati i do 20 stupnjeva iznad temperature zraka,

they can swim at over 40 miles an hour.

mogu plivati i preko 40 km/h.

So that pretty much eliminates

To poprilično eliminira

all the advantages of farming a fish, right?

sve prednosti uzgoja , zar ne?

A farmed fish is --

A uzgojna riba je --

or a fish is cold-blooded, it doesn't move too much.

hladnkokrvna i ne kreće se previše.

That's a great thing for growing protein.

To je sjajna stvar za uzgoj proteina.

But if you've got this crazy, wild creature

Ali ako imate ovo ludo, divlje biće

that swims at 40 miles an hour and heats its blood --

koje pliva 40 hm/h i zagrijava svoju krv --

not a great candidate for aquaculture.

nije baš idealan kandidat za akvakulturu.

The next creature --

Sljedeće biće --

most consumed seafood in America and throughout the West --

koje naviše konzumira Amerika i zapad --

is salmon.

Je losos.

Now salmon got its plundering, too,

Naravno i losos je bio ''pljačkan''

but it didn't really necessarily happen through fishing.

što se nije nužno događalo kroz ribolov.

This is my home state of Connecticut.

Ovo je moja država Connecticut.

Connecticut used to be home to a lot of wild salmon.

Connecticut je nekada bio dom divljeg lososa.

But if you look at this map of Connecticut,

No, ako pogledate ovu mapu Connecticuta,

every dot on that map is a dam.

svaka točka na mapi je nasip.

There are over 3,000 dams in the state of Connecticut.

Postoji više od 3,000 nasipa u Connecticutu.

I often say this is why people in Connecticut are so uptight --

Zato ja znam reći da su ljudi u Connecticutu napeti --

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

If somebody could just unblock Connecticut's chi,

Kada bi bar netko mogao odblokirati chi Connecticuta,

I feel that we could have an infinitely better world.

mislim da bi tada svijet mogao biti bolji.

But I made this particular comment

Ali ovo sam komentirao

at a convention once of national parks officers,

i na okupljanju čuvara nacionalnih parkova

and this guy from North Carolina sidled up to me, he says,

gdje je jedan član iz Sjeverne Karoline došao i rekao:

"You know, you oughtn't be so hard on your Connecticut,

''Znaš, ne smiješ tako govoriti o svom Connecticutu

cause we here in North Carolina, we got 35,000 dams."

zato što mi ovdje u Sjevernoj Karolini imamo 35,000 nasipa.''

So it's a national epidemic, it's an international epidemic.

Tako da ovo nije državna već internacionalna epidemija.

And there are dams everywhere,

Nasipi su posvuda,

and these are precisely the things

i baš oni će spriječiti

that stop wild salmon from reaching their spawning grounds.

divljeg lososa da ne dosegne mjesto gdje može izleći jaja.

So as a result, we've turned to aquaculture,

Kao rezultat toga okrenuli smo se akvakulturi,

and salmon is one the most successful, at least from a numbers point of view.

što čini uzgoj lososa najuspješnijim, s brojnih gledališta.

When they first started farming salmon,

Kada smo počeli uzgajati lososa

it could take as many as six pounds of wild fish

trebalo nam je oko tri kilograma divlje ribe

to make a single pound of salmon.

da napravimo pola kilograma lososa.

The industry has, to its credit, greatly improved.

Industrija se, priznajmo im to, vrlo poboljšala.

They've gotten it below two to one,

Smanjili su odnos na kilogram za pola,

although it's a little bit of a cheat

iako je to pomalo i prijevara

because if you look at the way aquaculture feed is produced,

jer, ako pogledamo način na koji se proizvode,

they're measuring pellets --

vidimo da mjere palete na način:

pounds of pellets per pound of salmon.

kilogram peleta po kilogramu lososa.

Those pellets are in turn reduced fish.

Ti peleti smanjuju kvalitetu ribe.

So the actual -- what's called the FIFO, the fish in and the fish out --

Koja riba ide unutra a koja van?

kind of hard to say.

Teško je reći.

But in any case,

Ali u svakom slučaju,

credit to the industry,

pohvale idu industriji

it has lowered the amount of fish per pound of salmon.

što je smanjila količinu ribe po kilogramu lososa.

Problem is we've also gone crazy

Problem je i u tome što smo pretjerali

with the amount of salmon that we're producing.

i u količini lososa kojeg proizvodimo.

Aquaculture is the fastest growing food system on the planet.

Akvakultura je najbrže rastući prehrambeni sustav na planetu.

It's growing at something like seven percent per year.

Raste otprilike oko 7% godišnje.

And so even though we're doing less per fish

Unatoč tome što koristimo manje riba

to bring it to the market,

koje stavljamo na tržište,

we're still killing a lot of these little fish.

i dalje ubijamo veliku količinu tih malih riba.

And it's not just fish that we're feeding fish to,

Ne radi se samo o ribama kojima hranimo druge ribe,

we're also feeding fish to chickens and pigs.

također ribama hranimo i kokoši i svinje.

So we've got chickens and they're eating fish,

Tako da imamo kokoši koje jedu ribe,

but weirdly, we also have fish that are eating chickens.

i začuđujuće, ribe koje jedu kokoši.

Because the byproducts of chickens -- feathers, blood, bone --

Zato što se dijelovi kokoške, kao što su perje, krv i kosti,

get ground up and fed to fish.

samelju i time nahrane ribe.

So I often wonder,

Često se pitam,

is there a fish that ate a chicken that ate a fish?

postoji li negdje riba koja je pojela kokoš koja je pojela ribu?

It's sort of a reworking of the chicken and egg thing. Anyway --

Podsjeća na pitanje o kokoši i jajetu?

(Laughter)

(Smijeh)

All together, though, it results in a terrible mess.

Sve zajedno rezultira velikim neredom.

What you're talking about

Ono o čemu pričamo

is something between 20 and 30 million metric tons of wild creatures

jest to da je između 20 i 30 milijuna tona divljih bića

that are taken from the ocean and used and ground up.

izvađeno iz oceana i iskorišteno.

That's the equivalent of a third of a China,

To je jednako jednoj trećini Kine,

or of an entire United States of humans

ili cijelim Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama

that's taken out of the sea each and every year.

izvađenima iz mora iz godine u godinu.

The last of the four is a kind of amorphous thing.

Zadnja od četiri je bezoblična riba.

It's what the industry calls "whitefish."

Ono što u industriji zovu ''bijela riba''.

There are many fish that get cycled into this whitefish thing

Postoji mnogo stvari koje se stavljaju u ovu bijelu ribu,

but the way to kind of tell the story, I think,

a najbolji način za ispričati priču je, mislim,

is through that classic piece of American culinary innovation,

kroz klasičnu priču Američke kulinarske inovacije,

the Filet-O-Fish sandwich.

ribljeg sendviča.

So the Filet-O-Fish sandwich actually started as halibut.

Riblji je sendvič zapravo nastao uporabom iveraka.

And it started because a local franchise owner

Počeo je zato što je lokalni vlasnik McDonaldsa

found that when he served his McDonald's on Friday, nobody came.

zaključio da kada je posluživao svoj jelovnik petkom, nitko nije došao.

Because it was a Catholic community, they needed fish.

Bio je u katoličkoj sredini gdje su jeli ribu petkom.

So he went to Ray Kroc and he said,

Otišao je do Ray Kroca i rekao,

"I'm going to bring you a fish sandwich, going to be made out of halibut."

''Napraviti ću ti riblji sendvič koji ću napraviti od iveraka.''

Ray Kroc said, "I don't think it's going to work.

Ray Krock je rekao '' Ne vjerujem da ćeš uspjeti.

I want to do a Hula Burger,

Želim napraviti Hula burger

and there's going to be a slice of pineapple on a bun.

koji će imati komad ananasa na vrhu.

But let's do this, let's have a bet.

Ali može, hajde da se kladimo.

Whosever sandwich sells more, that will be the winning sandwich."

Čiji se sendvič bude bolje prodavao, to će biti pobjednički sendvič.''

Well, it's kind of sad for the ocean that the Hula Burger didn't win.

Na veliku žalost oceana, Hula burger nije pobijedio,

So he made his halibut sandwich.

Uspio je napraviti svoj riblji sendvič.

Unfortunately though, the sandwich came in at 30 cents.

Nažalost, sendvič je koštao 30 centi,

Ray wanted the sandwich to come in at 25 cents,

a Ray je htio da košta 25 centi,

so he turned to Atlantic cod.

Pa se okrenio atlantskom bakalaru.

We all know what happened to Atlantic cod in New England.

A svi znamo što se dogodilo bakalaru u Novoj Engleskoj.

So now the Filet-O-Fish sandwich is made out of Alaska pollock,

Tako da je danas riblji sendvič napravljen od aljaške kolje,

it's the largest fin fish fishery in the United States,

koja je najbolja uzgojna riba u SAD-u,

2 to 3 billion pounds of fish taken out of the sea every single year.

2 do 3 milijardi kilograma te ribe vadi se iz more svake godine.

If we go through the pollock,

Ako nestane kolje,

the next choice is probably going to be tilapia.

sljedeći izbor će vjerojatno biti tilapija.

Tilapia is one of those fish nobody ever heard of 20 years ago.

Tilapija je riba za koju nitko nije čuo do prije 20 godina.

It's actually a very efficient converter of plant protein into animal protein,

Ona je jako učinkovita u pretvorbi biljnih proteina u životinjske,

and it's been a godsend to the third world.

bila je spas za treći svijet.

It's actually a tremendously sustainable solution,

To je zapravo održivo riješenje,

it goes from an egg to an adult in nine months.

treba devet mjeseci razvitka do odraslog oblika.

The problem is that when you look about the West,

Problem je što, kada pogledamo zapad,

it doesn't do what the West wants it to do.

to nije ono što zapad želi.

It really doesn't have what's called an oily fish profile.

Nema ono nešto što se zove uljni riblji profil.

It doesn't have the EPA and DHA omega-3s

Nema EPA i DHA omega-3 kiselina

that we all think are going to make us live forever.

za koje mislimo da će nam podariti vječni život.

So what do we do?

Što moramo napraviti?

I mean, first of all, what about this poor fish, the clupeids?

Mislim, kao prvo, šta ćemo s ovom jadnom ribom, srdeljkom ?

The fish that represent a huge part of that 20 to 30 million metric tons.

To je riba koja čini veliki dio od tih 20,30 milijuna tona.

Well, one possibility that a lot of conservationists have raised

Pojavilo se pitanje

is could we eat them?

možemo li ih jesti?

Could we eat them directly instead of feeding them to salmon?

Možemo li ih jesti direktno, da njima ne hranimo prvo losose?

There are arguments for it.

Ovo su argumenti.

They are tremendously fuel efficient to bring to market,

Zahtjevaju puno energetske vrijednosti da bi se stavile na tržište,

a fraction of the fuel cost of say, shrimp,

dio te vrijednosti košta, kao jedan škamp,

and at the very top of the carbon efficiency scale.

i na samom je vrhu što se tiče efikasnosti ugljikohidrata.

They also are omega-3 rich, a great source for EPA and DHA.

Također su bogate omega-3 kiselinama, odličan izvor EPA i DHA.

So that is a potential.

To je potencijal.

And if we were to go down that route what I would say is,

No ako ćemo već ići u tom smjeru,

instead of paying a few bucks a pound -- or a few bucks a ton, really --

umjesto da plaćamo nekoliko dolara za kilogram, ili tonu,

and making it into aquafeed,

i hranimo njima ribe,

could we halve the catch and double the price for the fishermen

možemo li prepoloviti ulov i udvostručiti cijenu za ribolovce

and make that our way of treating these particular fish?

I tako odlučivati o sudbini tih riba?

Other possibility though, which is much more interesting,

Druga mogućnost,koja je puno zanimljivija,

is looking at bivalves, particularly mussels.

je da obratimo pažnju na školjkaše, posebno dagnje.

Now, mussels are very high in EPA and DHA, they're similar to canned tuna.

Dagnje sadrže veliku koncentraciju EPA i DHA, slične su konzerviranoj tuni.

They're also extremely fuel efficient.

Imaju veliku energetsku vrijednost.

To bring a pound of mussels to market

Stavljanje dagnji na tržište

is about a thirtieth of the carbon as required to bring beef to market.

čini jednu trećinu ugljikohidrata što je isto kao i kod govedine.

They require no forage fish,

Ne zahtjevaju dohranu ribama

they actually get their omega-3s by filtering the water of microalgae.

Dobiju svoje omega 3 kiseline filtracijom mikroalgi u vodi.

In fact, that's where omega-3s come from, they don't come from fish.

Ustvari, tako i dobivamo omega 3 kiseline, ne iz ribe.

Microalgae make the omega-3s, they're only bioconcentrated in fish.

Mikroalge proizvode omega 3 kiseline koje se koncentriraju u ribama.

Mussels and other bivalves

Dagnje i ostali školjkaši

do tremendous amounts of water filtration.

naveliko filtriraju vodu.

A single mussel can filter dozens of gallons every single day.

Jedna dagnja može filtrirati na destke galona vode svakog dana.

And this is incredibly important when we look at the world.

To je jako bitno kada pogledamo svijet.

Right now, nitrification, overuse of phosphates in our waterways

Trenutno, nitrati i prevelika uporaba fosfata iz vode

are causing tremendous algal blooms.

uzrokuju preveliko cvjetanje algi.

Over 400 new dead zones have been created in the last 20 years,

Više od 400 mrtvih zona stvoreno je u zadnjih 20 godina,

tremendous sources of marine life death.

veliki uzrok umiranja riba.

We also could look at not a fish at all.

Također uopće ne moramo ni gledati na ribu.

We could look at a vegetable.

Možemo pogledati i povrće.

We could look at seaweed, the kelps,

Možemo pogledati morsku travu,

all these different varieties of things that can be high in omega-3s,

i sve ostale stvari koje mogu biti pune omega 3 kiselina,

can be high in proteins,

pune proteina,

tremendously good things.

i ostalih odličnih stvari.

They filter the water just like mussels do.

Filtriraju vodu poput dagnji.

And weirdly enough,

Začuđujuće,

it turns out that you can actually feed this to cows.

izgleda da ovime možete hraniti i krave.

Now, I'm not a big fan of cattle.

Ja nisam veliki fan stoke,

But if you wanted to keep growing cattle

Ali ako želite uzgajati stoku

in a time and place where water resources are limited,

u vremenu i mjestu gdje su izvori vode ograničeni,

you're growing seaweed in the water, you don't have to water it --

možete uzgajati morsku travu u vodi, čak je ne morate zaljevati,

major consideration.

razmislite.

And the last fish is a question mark.

Zadnja riba je pod velikim upitnikom.

We have the ability to create aquacultured fish

Imamo mogućnost stvoriti uzgojnu ribu,

that creates a net gain of marine protein for us.

koja stvara neto dobit morskog proteina za nas.

This creature would have to be vegetarian,

Ovo biće moralo bi biti vegeterijanac,

it would have to be fast growing,

moralo bi brzo rasti,

it would have to be adaptable to a changing climate

moralo bi se prilagoditi na promjenjivu klimu

and it would have to have that oily fish profile,

i moralo bi imati taj uljni riblji profil,

that EPA, DHA, omega-3 fatty acid profile that we're looking for.

EPA, DHA, omega 3 kiseline koje tražimo.

This exists kind of on paper.

To postoji samo na papiru.

I have been reporting on these subjects for 15 years.

Izvještavam o ovim temama već 15 godina.

Every time I do a new story, somebody tells me,

Svaki put kada napravim novu priču netko mi kaže

"We can do all that. We can do it. We've figured it all out.

'' Možemo mi sve to napraviti. Sve smo shvatili.

We can produce a fish

'' Možemo mi sve to napraviti. Sve smo shvatili.

that's a net gain of marine protein and has omega-3s."

Koja ima neto dobit morskog proteina I omega 3 kiselina.''

Great.

Divno.

It doesn't seem to be getting scaled up.

Ne uspjevamo to dobiti.

It is time to scale this up.

Vrijeme je,

If we do,

Jer ako uspijemo,

30 million metric tons of seafood, a third of the world catch,

30 milijuna tona morske ribe , trećina svijetskog ulova,

stays in the water.

će ostati pod vodom.

So I guess what I'm saying is this is what we've been going with.

Ono što pokušavam reći jest da je ovo način na koji se nosimo sa tim.

We tend to go with our appetites rather than our minds.

Uvijek naginjemo prema svom apetitu prije nego pameti.

But if we went with this, or some configuration of it,

Ali ako se potrudimo,

we might have a little more of this.

imati ćemo puno više.

Thank you.

Hvala.

(Applause)

(Pljesak)