Ugly History: The U.S. Syphilis Experiment - Susan M. Reverby

In the 1930s, the United States was ravaged by syphilis.

This sexually transmitted infection afflicted nearly 1 in 10 Americans,

producing painful sores and rashes that persisted for roughly two years.

After these initial symptoms, late-stage syphilis was known to cause organ damage,

heart and brain disorders, and even blindness.

It was incredibly difficult to slow the disease’s spread.

Experts cautioned against unprotected sex,

but the infection could also be passed during childbirth.

Worse still, existing treatments like mercury and bismuth

were considered unreliable at best and potentially harmful at worst.

Today these heavy metals are classified as toxic,

but at the time, doctors were still uncovering their dangerous side effects.

Amidst the uncertainty, health care professionals had two key questions.

Did late-stage syphilis warrant the risks of existing treatments?

And, did the infected individual’s race change how the disease progressed?

Many physicians were convinced syphilis affected

the neurological systems of white patients

and the cardiovascular systems of Black patients.

There was little evidence for this theory,

but the U.S. Public Health Service was determined to investigate further.

In 1932 they launched a massive experiment in Tuskegee, Alabama.

The town had already possessed a small hospital,

and the area was home to a large population of potential participants.

The PHS collaborated with local doctors and nurses

to recruit roughly 400 Black men presumed to have noncontagious late-stage syphilis,

as well as 200 non-syphilitic Black men for their control group.

But their recruitment plan centered on a lie.

While the researchers planned to observe how syphilis

would progress with minimal treatment,

participants were told they would receive free drugs and care for their condition.

At first, researchers gave the men existing treatments,

but these were soon replaced with placebos.

Under the false pretense of providing a special remedy,

researchers performed painful and invasive spinal taps

to investigate the disease’s neurological consequences.

When patients died, the PHS would swoop in to study the body

by funding funerals in exchange for autopsies.

In their published studies, they listed the men as volunteers

to obscure the circumstances under which they’d been recruited.

Outside Alabama, syphilis treatment was advancing.

A decade after the study began,

clinical trials confirmed that penicillin effectively cured the disease

in its early stages.

But in Tuskegee, researchers were determined to keep pursuing

what they considered vital research.

They had yet to confirm their theories about racial difference,

and they believed they would never have another opportunity

to observe the long-term effects of untreated syphilis.

The study’s leadership decided to withhold knowledge of new treatments

from their subjects.

During World War II, researchers convinced the local draft board

to exempt men from their study,

preventing them from enlisting and potentially accessing penicillin.

The study even continued through the 1950s

when penicillin was shown to help manage late-stage syphilis.

By today’s bioethical standards,

withholding treatment in a research study without a patient’s informed consent

is morally abhorrent.

But for a large part of the 20th century, this practice was not uncommon.

In the 1940s, US led studies in Guatemala infected

numerous prisoners, sex workers, soldiers, and mental health patients

with sexually transmitted infections to study potential treatments.

And other studies throughout the 50s and 60s

saw doctors secretly infecting patients with viral hepatitis or even cancer cells.

Eventually, researchers began objecting to these unjust experiments.

In the late 1960s, an STI contact tracer named Peter Buxtun

convinced the PHS to consider ending the study.

But after leadership decided against it, Buxtun sent his concerns to the press.

In July of 1972, an exposé of the Tuskegee study made headlines across the country.

Following public outcry, a federal investigation, and a lawsuit,

the study was finally shut down in 1972— 40 years after it began

and 30 after a treatment for syphilis had been found.

No evidence of any racial difference was discovered.

When the study ended, only 74 of the original 600 men were alive.

40 of their wives and 19 of their children had contracted syphilis,

presumably from their husbands and fathers.

In the wake of this tragedy, and concerns about similar experiments,

Congress passed new regulations for ethical research and informed consent.

But systemic racism continues to permeate medical care and research

throughout the US.

To truly address these issues,

the need for structural change, better access to care,

and transparency in research remains urgent.