Damon Horowitz calls for a "moral operating system"

Prevodilac: Ivana Krivokuća Lektor: Mile Živković

Power.

Moć.

That is the word that comes to mind.

To je reč koja pada na pamet.

We're the new technologists.

Mi smo novi tehnolozi.

We have a lot of data, so we have a lot of power.

Imamo mnogo podataka, stoga imamo mnogo moći.

How much power do we have?

Koliko moći imamo?

Scene from a movie: "Apocalypse Now" -- great movie.

Scena iz filma "Apokalipsa danas" - sjajnog filma.

We've got to get our hero, Captain Willard, to the mouth of the Nung River

Moramo da dovedemo našeg heroja, kapetana Vilarda, do ušća reke Nung

so he can go pursue Colonel Kurtz.

kako bi krenuo u potragu za pukovnikom Kercom.

The way we're going to do this is fly him in and drop him off.

Zato ćemo ga tamo odvesti avionom i ostaviti ga.

So the scene:

Dakle, scena je:

the sky is filled with this fleet of helicopters carrying him in.

nebo je ispunjeno flotom helikoptera koji ga prenose.

And there's this loud, thrilling music in the background,

I tu je ta glasna, uzbudljiva muzika u pozadini,

this wild music.

ta divlja muzika.

♫ Dum da ta da dum ♫

♫ Dum da ta da dum ♫

♫ Dum da ta da dum ♫

♫ Dum da ta da dum ♫

♫ Da ta da da ♫

♫ Da ta da da ♫

That's a lot of power.

To je puno moći.

That's the kind of power I feel in this room.

To je moć kakvu osećam u ovoj prostoriji.

That's the kind of power we have

Takvu moć imamo

because of all of the data that we have.

zbog svih podataka koje posedujemo.

Let's take an example.

Uzmimo jedan primer.

What can we do

Šta možemo da uradimo

with just one person's data?

sa podacima samo jedne osobe?

What can we do

Šta možemo da uradimo

with that guy's data?

sa podacima ovog tipa? Mogu da pogledam

I can look at your financial records.

vaše finansijsko stanje.

I can tell if you pay your bills on time.

Da vidim da li redovno plaćate račune.

I know if you're good to give a loan to.

Znam da li ste pogodni za davanje kredita.

I can look at your medical records; I can see if your pump is still pumping --

Da pogledam vaš medicinski karton -

da vidim da li vaša pumpa još uvek pumpa -

see if you're good to offer insurance to.

da li ste pogodni za ponudu osiguranja.

I can look at your clicking patterns.

Mogu da vidim vaše obrasce kliktanja.

When you come to my website, I actually know what you're going to do already

Kad dođete na moj sajt, zapravo već znam šta ćete uraditi

because I've seen you visit millions of websites before.

jer sam već ranije video kako posećujte milione sajtova.

And I'm sorry to tell you,

I žao mi je da vam to kažem,

you're like a poker player, you have a tell.

odajete znake kao igrač pokera.

I can tell with data analysis what you're going to do

Mogu da otkrijem analizom podataka

before you even do it.

šta ćete uraditi pre nego što to i učinite.

I know what you like. I know who you are,

Znam šta volite. Znam ko ste,

i to čak i pre nego što pogledam vašu poštu

and that's even before I look at your mail

or your phone.

ili vaš telefon.

Those are the kinds of things we can do

Takve stvari možemo da uradimo

with the data that we have.

sa podacima koje imamo.

But I'm not actually here to talk about what we can do.

Ali ja u stvari nisam ovde da bih govorio o tome šta možemo činiti.

I'm here to talk about what we should do.

Ovde sam da bih govorio o tome šta bi trebalo da činimo.

What's the right thing to do?

Šta je prava stvar koju treba uraditi?

Now I see some puzzled looks

Vidim neke zbunjene poglede

like, "Why are you asking us what's the right thing to do?

u stilu: "Zašto nas pitaš šta je prava stvar koju treba uraditi?

We're just building this stuff. Somebody else is using it."

Mi samo pravimo ove stvari. Neko drugi ih koristi."

Fair enough.

Pošteno.

But it brings me back.

Ali to me vraća unazad.

I think about World War II --

Razmišljam o Drugom svetskom ratu -

some of our great technologists then,

nekim od tadašnjih velikih tehnologa,

some of our great physicists,

o nekim velikim fizičarima

studying nuclear fission and fusion --

koji su izučavali nuklearnu fisiju i fuziju -

just nuclear stuff.

prosto nuklearne stvari.

We gather together these physicists in Los Alamos

Okupimo ove fizičare u Los Alamosu

to see what they'll build.

da vidimo šta će stvoriti.

We want the people building the technology

Želimo da ljudi koji grade tehnologiju

thinking about what we should be doing with the technology.

razmišljaju o tome šta bi trebalo da radimo sa tehnologijom.

So what should we be doing with that guy's data?

Dakle, šta bi trebalo da radimo sa podacima tog tipa?

Should we be collecting it, gathering it,

Treba li da ih sakupljamo, grupišemo, da bismo mogli

so we can make his online experience better?

da njegovo onlajn iskustvo učinimo boljim?

So we can make money?

Da bismo mogli da zaradimo novac?

So we can protect ourselves

Da zaštitimo sebe

if he was up to no good?

ako bi on imao loše namere?

Or should we respect his privacy,

Ili bi trebalo da poštujemo njegovu privatnost,

protect his dignity and leave him alone?

štitimo njegovo dostojanstvo i ostavimo ga na miru?

Which one is it?

Šta od toga?

How should we figure it out?

Kako to da otkrijemo?

I know: crowdsource. Let's crowdsource this.

Znam: kraudsorsing. Hajde da to uradimo.

Da se ljudi zagreju,

So to get people warmed up,

počnimo sa lakim pitanjem -

let's start with an easy question --

something I'm sure everybody here has an opinion about:

nečim za šta sam siguran da svi ovde imaju mišljenje o tome:

iPhone versus Android.

Ajfon naspram Androida.

Let's do a show of hands -- iPhone.

Hajdemo sa podizanjem ruku - Ajfon.

Uh huh.

Aha.

Android.

Android.

You'd think with a bunch of smart people

Čovek bi pomislio da gomila pametnih ljudi

we wouldn't be such suckers just for the pretty phones.

ne bi bili takve naivčine po pitanju lepih telefona.

(Laughter)

(Smeh)

Next question,

Sledeće pitanje,

a little bit harder.

malo teže.

Should we be collecting all of that guy's data

Da li bi trebalo da sakupljamo sve podatke tog tipa

to make his experiences better

da bismo učinili njegovo iskustvo boljim

and to protect ourselves in case he's up to no good?

i zaštitili sebe u slučaju da on sprema nešto loše?

Or should we leave him alone?

Ili treba da ga ostavimo na miru?

Collect his data.

Sakupljati njegove podatke.

Leave him alone.

Ostaviti ga na miru.

You're safe. It's fine.

Bezbedni ste. U redu je.

(Laughter)

(Smeh)

Okay, last question --

Okej, poslednje pitanje -

harder question --

teže pitanje -

when trying to evaluate

kada pokušavamo da procenimo

what we should do in this case,

šta treba da radimo u ovom slučaju,

should we use a Kantian deontological moral framework,

da li treba da koristimo Kantov deontološki moralni okvir,

or should we use a Millian consequentialist one?

ili treba da koristimo Milov konsekvencionalistički?

Kant.

Kant.

Mill.

Mil.

Not as many votes.

Nema toliko glasova.

(Laughter)

(Smeh)

Yeah, that's a terrifying result.

Da, to je zastrašujući rezultat.

Terrifying, because we have stronger opinions

Zastrašujuć, jer imamo snažnija mišljenja

about our hand-held devices

o našim mobilnim aparatima

than about the moral framework

nego o moralnom okviru

we should use to guide our decisions.

koji treba da koristimo za usmeravanje naših odluka.

How do we know what to do with all the power we have

Kako znamo šta da radimo sa svom tom moći koju imamo

if we don't have a moral framework?

ako nemamo moralni okvir?

We know more about mobile operating systems,

Znamo više o mobilnim operativnim sistemima,

but what we really need is a moral operating system.

ali ono što nam je zaista potrebno jeste moralni operativni sistem.

What's a moral operating system?

Šta je moralni operativni sistem?

We all know right and wrong, right?

Svi znamo za ispravno i pogrešno, zar ne?

You feel good when you do something right,

Osećate se dobro kada uradite nešto ispravno,

you feel bad when you do something wrong.

loše kada uradite nešto pogrešno.

Our parents teach us that: praise with the good, scold with the bad.

Naši roditelji nas uče tome: nagrađuju za dobro, grde za loše.

But how do we figure out what's right and wrong?

Ali kako da shvatimo šta je ispravno a šta pogrešno?

And from day to day, we have the techniques that we use.

Iz dana u dan, imamo tehnike koje koristimo.

Maybe we just follow our gut.

Možda jednostavno sledimo našu intuiciju.

Maybe we take a vote -- we crowdsource.

Možda glasamo - koristimo kraudsors.

Or maybe we punt --

Ili možda odustanemo -

ask the legal department, see what they say.

pitamo pravnike, vidimo šta oni kažu.

In other words, it's kind of random,

Drugim rečima, nekako je slučajno,

kind of ad hoc,

nekako ad hoc,

how we figure out what we should do.

kako rešavamo šta bi trebalo da radimo.

And maybe, if we want to be on surer footing,

Možda je, ako želimo da stojimo na čvršćoj podlozi,

what we really want is a moral framework that will help guide us there,

ono što nam zaista treba moralni okvir koji će nam pomoći da se uputimo tamo,

that will tell us what kinds of things are right and wrong in the first place,

koji će nam reći uopšte kakve stvari su ispravne i pogrešne,

and how would we know in a given situation what to do.

i kako bismo znali šta da činimo u datoj situaciji.

So let's get a moral framework.

Hajde onda da pribavimo moralni poredak.

We're numbers people, living by numbers.

Mi smo ljudi od brojeva, živimo po brojevima.

How can we use numbers

Kako možemo da koristimo brojeve

as the basis for a moral framework?

kao osnovu za moralni okvir?

I know a guy who did exactly that.

Znam tipa koji je učinio upravo to.

A brilliant guy --

Sjajan tip -

he's been dead 2,500 years.

mrtav je poslednjih 2500 godina.

Plato, that's right.

Platon, tako je.

Remember him -- old philosopher?

Sećate ga se - stari filozof?

You were sleeping during that class.

Spavali ste na tom času.

And Plato, he had a lot of the same concerns that we did.

Platon je imao dosta istih briga koje i mi imamo.

He was worried about right and wrong.

Brinuo je oko ispravnog i pogrešnog.

He wanted to know what is just.

Želeo je da zna šta je pravedno.

But he was worried that all we seem to be doing

Ali je brinuo da je sve što da radimo

is trading opinions about this.

razmena mišljenja o ovome.

He says something's just. She says something else is just.

On kaže da je nešto pravedno. Ona da je nešto drugo pravedno.

It's kind of convincing when he talks and when she talks too.

Nekako je ubedljivo kad on govori i kad ona govori.

I'm just going back and forth; I'm not getting anywhere.

Samo idem napred-nazad, ne stižem nigde.

I don't want opinions; I want knowledge.

Ne želim mišljenja; želim znanje.

I want to know the truth about justice --

Želim da znam istinu o pravdi -

like we have truths in math.

kao što imamo istine u matematici.

In math, we know the objective facts.

U matematici znamo objektivne činjenice.

Take a number, any number -- two.

Uzmite broj, bilo koji broj - dva.

Favorite number. I love that number.

Omiljeni broj. Volim taj broj.

There are truths about two.

Postoje istine u vezi dva.

If you've got two of something,

Ako imate dva nečega,

you add two more, you get four.

dodate još dva, dobijate četiri.

That's true no matter what thing you're talking about.

To je istinito bez obzira o čemu govorite.

It's an objective truth about the form of two,

To je objektivna istina o obliku dva,

the abstract form.

apstraktnom obliku.

When you have two of anything -- two eyes, two ears, two noses,

Kada imate dva bilo čega - dva oka, dva uha, dva nosa,

just two protrusions --

prosto dve izbočine -

those all partake of the form of two.

sve to sačinjava oblik dva.

They all participate in the truths that two has.

Svi oni učestvuju u istinama koje dva ima.

They all have two-ness in them.

Svi oni imaju dva-nost u njima.

And therefore, it's not a matter of opinion.

I prema tome, to nije stvar mišljenja.

What if, Plato thought,

Šta kad bi, Platon je razmišljao,

ethics was like math?

etika bila kao matematika?

What if there were a pure form of justice?

Šta kada bi postojao čist oblik pravde?

What if there are truths about justice,

Šta ako postoje istine o pravednosti,

and you could just look around in this world

i možete samo pogledati svet oko sebe

and see which things participated,

i videti koje stvari učestvuju,

partook of that form of justice?

sačinjavaju taj oblik pravednosti?

Then you would know what was really just and what wasn't.

Tada biste znali šta je zaista pravedno a šta nije.

It wouldn't be a matter

To ne bi bila stvar

of just opinion or just appearances.

pravednog mišljenja ili pravednih predstava.

That's a stunning vision.

To je zapanjujuća vizija.

I mean, think about that. How grand. How ambitious.

Razmislite o tome. Kako veličanstveno. Kako ambiciozno.

That's as ambitious as we are.

To je ambiciozno koliko i mi.

He wants to solve ethics.

On hoće da reši etiku.

He wants objective truths.

On želi objektivne istine.

If you think that way,

Ako razmišljate na taj način,

you have a Platonist moral framework.

imate platonski moralni okvir.

If you don't think that way,

Ako ne mislite na taj način,

well, you have a lot of company in the history of Western philosophy,

pa, imate dosta društva u istoriji zapadne filozofije,

because the tidy idea, you know, people criticized it.

zbog uređene ideje, znate, ljudi su je kritikovali.

Aristotle, in particular, he was not amused.

Aristotelu naročito, nije mu bila zabavna.

He thought it was impractical.

Mislio je da je nepraktična.

Aristotle said, "We should seek only so much precision in each subject

Aristotel je rekao: "Trebalo bi da tražimo samo onoliko preciznosti u svakoj temi

as that subject allows."

koliko to tema dozvoljava."

Aristotle thought ethics wasn't a lot like math.

Aristotel je mislio da etika nije mnogo slična matematici.

He thought ethics was a matter of making decisions in the here-and-now

Mislio je da je etika stvar donošenja odluka, sada i ovde

using our best judgment

koristeći naše najbolje procene

to find the right path.

da pronađemo pravi put.

If you think that, Plato's not your guy.

Ako tako mislite, Platon nije za vas.

But don't give up.

Ali ne odustajte.

Maybe there's another way

Možda postoji drugi način

that we can use numbers as the basis of our moral framework.

da koristimo brojeve kao osnovu za naš moralni okvir.

How about this:

Kako se čini ovo:

What if in any situation you could just calculate,

šta ako biste mogli da u bilo kojoj situaciji izračunate,

look at the choices,

pogledate izbore,

measure out which one's better and know what to do?

izmerite koji je bolji i znate šta da radite?

That sound familiar?

Da li to zvuči poznato?

That's a utilitarian moral framework.

To je utilitaristički moralni okvir.

John Stuart Mill was a great advocate of this --

Džon Stjuart Mil je bio veliki zastupnik ovoga -

nice guy besides --

dobar tip inače -

and only been dead 200 years.

i mrtav je svega 200 godina.

So basis of utilitarianism --

Dakle, osnove utilitarizma -

I'm sure you're familiar at least.

siguran sam da su vam bar poznate. Tri osobe

The three people who voted for Mill before are familiar with this.

koje su malopre glasale za Mila su upoznate

But here's the way it works.

sa ovim. Evo kako to funkcioniše.

What if morals, what if what makes something moral

Šta ako je ono što čini nešto moralnim

is just a matter of if it maximizes pleasure

samo stvar toga da li uvećava zadovoljstvo

and minimizes pain?

i umanjuje bol?

It does something intrinsic to the act.

Radi nešto svojstveno tom činu.

It's not like its relation to some abstract form.

Nije to odnos prema nekoj apstraktnoj formi.

It's just a matter of the consequences.

To je samo pitanje posledica.

You just look at the consequences

Jednostavno pogledate posledice

and see if, overall, it's for the good or for the worse.

i vidite da li je, sveukupno, dobro ili loše.

That would be simple. Then we know what to do.

To bi bilo jednostavno. Tada znamo šta da radimo.

Let's take an example.

Suppose I go up

Hajde da uzmemo primer.

Pretpostavimo da ja ustanem

and I say, "I'm going to take your phone."

i kažem: "Uzeću tvoj telefon."

Not just because it rang earlier,

Ne prosto zato što je prethodno zazvonio,

but I'm going to take it because I made a little calculation.

već ću ga uzeti jer sam napravio malu računicu.

I thought, that guy looks suspicious.

Pomislio sam, taj tip deluje sumnjivo.

And what if he's been sending little messages to Bin Laden's hideout --

Šta ako je slao porukice u Bin Ladenovo skrovište -

or whoever took over after Bin Laden --

ili ko god da je nasledio Bin Ladena -

and he's actually like a terrorist, a sleeper cell.

i on je zapravo poput teroriste, tajni agent.

I'm going to find that out, and when I find that out,

Ja ću to da otkrijem, i kada otkrijem,

I'm going to prevent a huge amount of damage that he could cause.

sprečiću ogromnu količinu štete koju bi on mogao izazvati.

That has a very high utility to prevent that damage.

To je veoma velika korist od sprečavanja te štete.

And compared to the little pain that it's going to cause --

I upoređujući to sa malo bola koje će izazvati -

because it's going to be embarrassing when I'm looking on his phone

jer će biti nelagodno kada budem pregledao njegov telefon

and seeing that he has a Farmville problem and that whole bit --

i video da ima problem s Farmvilom i sve to -

that's overwhelmed

nadjačan je

by the value of looking at the phone.

vrednošću pregledanja telefona.

If you feel that way,

Ako imate takvo mišljenje,

that's a utilitarian choice.

to je utilitaristički izbor.

But maybe you don't feel that way either.

Ali možda ne razmišljate ni tako.

Maybe you think, it's his phone.

Možda smatrate, to je njegov telefon.

It's wrong to take his phone

Pogrešno je uzeti njegov telefon

because he's a person

jer je on osoba

and he has rights and he has dignity,

i ima prava i dostojanstvo,

and we can't just interfere with that.

i mi ne možemo da to prosto ometamo.

He has autonomy.

On ima autonomiju.

It doesn't matter what the calculations are.

Nema veze kakvi su proračuni.

There are things that are intrinsically wrong --

Postoje stvari koje su suštinski pogrešne -

like lying is wrong,

kao što je laganje pogrešno,

like torturing innocent children is wrong.

kao što je mučenje nevine dece pogrešno.

Kant was very good on this point,

Kant je bio jako dobar po ovom pitanju,

and he said it a little better than I'll say it.

a rekao je to malo bolje nego što ću ja reći.

He said we should use our reason

Rekao je da treba da koristimo naš razum

to figure out the rules by which we should guide our conduct,

da bismo shvatili pravila po kojima treba da upravljamo našim ponašanjem,

and then it is our duty to follow those rules.

a onda je naša dužnost da sledimo ta pravila.

It's not a matter of calculation.

To nije stvar proračuna.

So let's stop.

Dakle, hajde da stanemo.

We're right in the thick of it, this philosophical thicket.

Sad smo baš u sred ove filozofske vrzine.

And this goes on for thousands of years,

I ovo se odvija hiljadama godina,

because these are hard questions,

jer ovo su teška pitanja,

and I've only got 15 minutes.

a ja imam samo 15 minuta.

So let's cut to the chase.

Stoga pređimo na stvar.

How should we be making our decisions?

Kako treba da donosimo naše odluke?

Is it Plato, is it Aristotle, is it Kant, is it Mill?

Da li po Platonu, Aristotelu, Kantu, Milu?

What should we be doing? What's the answer?

Šta bi trebalo da radimo? Šta je odgovor?

What's the formula that we can use in any situation

Koju formulu možemo koristiti u bilo kojoj situaciji

to determine what we should do,

da odredimo šta treba da radimo,

whether we should use that guy's data or not?

da li treba da koristimo podatke tog tipa ili ne?

What's the formula?

Koja je formula?

There's not a formula.

Nema formule.

There's not a simple answer.

Nema jednostavnog odgovora.

Ethics is hard.

Etika je teška.

Etika zahteva promišljanje.

Ethics requires thinking.

A to je neprijatno.

And that's uncomfortable.

I know; I spent a lot of my career

Ja znam; proveo sam veliki deo svoje karijere

in artificial intelligence,

u veštačkoj inteligenciji,

trying to build machines that could do some of this thinking for us,

pokušavajući da napravim mašine koje bi mogle da misle umesto nas,

that could give us answers.

koje bi nam mogle dati odgovore.

But they can't.

Ali one to ne mogu.

You can't just take human thinking

Ne možete samo da uzmete ljudsko razmišljanje

and put it into a machine.

i stavite ga u mašinu.

We're the ones who have to do it.

Mi smo oni koji treba to da čine.

Srećom, mi nismo mašine, i možemo to da činimo.

Happily, we're not machines, and we can do it.

Not only can we think,

Ne samo da možemo da mislimo,

we must.

moramo.

Hannah Arendt said,

Hana Arent je rekla:

"The sad truth

"Tužna istina

is that most evil done in this world

je da najviše zla počinjenog na ovom svetu

is not done by people

nisu počinili ljudi

who choose to be evil.

koji su odabrali da budu zli.

It arises from not thinking."

Proisteklo je iz nerazmišljanja."

That's what she called the "banality of evil."

To je ono što je ona nazvala "banalnošću zla."

And the response to that

A odgovor na to

is that we demand the exercise of thinking

je da zahtevamo vežbanje razmišljanja

from every sane person.

od svake razumne osobe.

So let's do that. Let's think.

Pa hajde da to radimo. Hajde da mislimo.

In fact, let's start right now.

U stvari, hajde da počnemo baš sada.

Every person in this room do this:

Neka svaka osoba u ovoj prostoriji uradi ovo:

think of the last time you had a decision to make

setite se poslednjeg puta kada ste donosili odluku

gde ste bili zabrinuti da li ćete učiniti pravu stvar,

where you were worried to do the right thing,

where you wondered, "What should I be doing?"

gde ste se pitali: "Šta treba da radim?"

Bring that to mind,

Prizovite to u mislima

and now reflect on that

i sada razmislite o tome

and say, "How did I come up that decision?

i recite: "Kako sam došao do te odluke?"

What did I do? Did I follow my gut?

Šta sam uradio? Da li sam sledio svoju intuiciju?

Did I have somebody vote on it? Or did I punt to legal?"

Da li sam dao nekome na glasanje? Ili sam prepustio pravnicima?"

Or now we have a few more choices.

Ili sad imamo nešto više izbora.

"Did I evaluate what would be the highest pleasure

"Da li sam procenio šta bi bilo najveće zadovoljstvo

like Mill would?

kao što bi Mil uradio? Ili kao Kant,

Or like Kant, did I use reason to figure out what was intrinsically right?"

da li sam koristio razum da shvatim šta je suštinski ispravno?

Think about it. Really bring it to mind. This is important.

Razmislite o tome. Zaista dozovite ovo u mislima. Ovo je važno.

It is so important

Toliko je važno

da ćemo potrošiti 30 sekundi dragocenog vremena TED govora

we are going to spend 30 seconds of valuable TEDTalk time

doing nothing but thinking about this.

radeći ništa drugo do razmišljanja o ovome.

Are you ready? Go.

Jeste li spremni? Krenite.

Stop. Good work.

Stanite. Dobro urađeno.

What you just did,

Ono što ste upravo uradili,

that's the first step towards taking responsibility

to je prvi korak ka preuzimanju odgovornosti

for what we should do with all of our power.

za ono što bi trebalo raditi sa svom našom moći.

Now the next step -- try this.

Sada sledeći korak - probajte ovo.

Go find a friend and explain to them

Nađite prijatelja i objasnite im

how you made that decision.

kako ste doneli tu odluku.

Not right now. Wait till I finish talking.

Ne odmah. Sačekajte da završim sa govorom.

Do it over lunch.

Uradite to za vreme ručka.

And don't just find another technologist friend;

I nemojte samo da nađete drugog prijatelja tehnologa;

find somebody different than you.

nađite nekog ko je drugačiji od vas.

Find an artist or a writer --

Nađite umetnika ili pisca -

or, heaven forbid, find a philosopher and talk to them.

ili, bože sačuvaj, nađite filozofa i pričajte sa njima.

In fact, find somebody from the humanities.

U stvari, nađite nekog iz humanističkih nauka.

Why? Because they think about problems

Zašto? Zato što oni misle o problemima

differently than we do as technologists.

drugačije nego mi kao tehnolozi.

Just a few days ago, right across the street from here,

Pre samo nekoliko dana, baš preko puta,

there was hundreds of people gathered together.

stotine ljudi se okupilo.

It was technologists and humanists

Bili su to tehnolozi i humanisti

at that big BiblioTech Conference.

na toj velikoj BiblioTech konferenciji.

And they gathered together

Okupili su se

because the technologists wanted to learn

jer su tehnolozi hteli da saznaju

what it would be like to think from a humanities perspective.

kako bi bilo razmišljati iz humanističke perspektive.

You have someone from Google

Imate nekog iz Gugla ko razgovara

talking to someone who does comparative literature.

sa nekim ko se bavi komparativnom književnošću.

You're thinking about the relevance of 17th century French theater --

Razmišljate o značaju francuskog pozorišta u XVII veku -

how does that bear upon venture capital?

kako se to odražava na preduzetnički kapital?

Well that's interesting. That's a different way of thinking.

Pa to je zanimljivo. To je drugačiji način razmišljanja.

And when you think in that way,

I kada razmišljate na taj način,

you become more sensitive to the human considerations,

postajete osetljiviji na ljudske obzire,

which are crucial to making ethical decisions.

koji su presudni za donošenje etičkih odluka.

So imagine that right now

Dakle, zamislite da ste sada

you went and you found your musician friend.

otišli i pronašli svog prijatelja muzičara.

And you're telling him what we're talking about,

Govorite mu o čemu smo pričali,

about our whole data revolution and all this --

o toj revoluciji podataka i svemu ovome -

maybe even hum a few bars of our theme music.

možda čak i otpevušite nekoliko taktova naše muzičke teme.

♫ Dum ta da da dum dum ta da da dum ♫

♫ Dum ta da da dum dum ta da da dum ♫

Well, your musician friend will stop you and say,

Pa, vaš prijatelj muzičar će vas zaustaviti i reći:

"You know, the theme music

"Znaš, muzička tema

for your data revolution,

iz tvoje revolucije podataka,

that's an opera, that's Wagner.

to je opera, to je Vagner.

It's based on Norse legend.

Zasnovana je na nordijskoj legendi.

It's Gods and mythical creatures

Radi se o bogovima i mitskim stvorenjima

fighting over magical jewelry."

koji se bore oko čarobnog nakita."

That's interesting.

To je zanimljivo.

To je takođe prelepa opera,

Now it's also a beautiful opera,

and we're moved by that opera.

i dirnuti smo tom operom.

We're moved because it's about the battle

Dirnuti smo jer je o bici

between good and evil,

između dobra i zla,

about right and wrong.

o ispravnom i pogrešnom.

And we care about right and wrong.

A nama je stalo do ispravnog i pogrešnog.

We care what happens in that opera.

Stalo nam je do toga šta se dešava u toj operi.

We care what happens in "Apocalypse Now."

Stalo nam je do toga šta se dešava u "Apokalipsi danas".

And we certainly care

I svakako nam je stalo

what happens with our technologies.

do toga šta se dešava sa našim tehnologijama.

We have so much power today,

Imamo toliko moći danas,

it is up to us to figure out what to do,

na nama je da shvatimo šta da radimo,

and that's the good news.

a to su dobre vesti.

We're the ones writing this opera.

Mi smo ti koji pišu ovu operu.

This is our movie.

Ovo je naš film.

We figure out what will happen with this technology.

Mi otkrivamo šta će se dogoditi sa ovom tehnologijom.

We determine how this will all end.

Mi određujemo kako će se sve ovo završiti.

Thank you.

Hvala vam.

(Applause)

(Aplauz)